Originally posted by Grampy Bobby(1) Simple analysis based on an aggregate memory of telling posts SB's made over many months.
[b]Wrong: (1) Simple analysis based on an aggregate memory of telling posts SB's made over many months. (2) There's no gb 'public persona' to suffer detriment.... one and the same face to face, on the phone, in cyberspace. Ask my close friends or my Mom. (3) Your dismissal of this brief exchange connotes an unexpected display of weak willed cowardi ...[text shortened]... m whom I speak with plainly. (5) We speak here. -Bobby
.........................[/b]
Could you be more vague? She's obviously done something to piss you off or you wouldn't have bizarrely flown off the handle at her innocent post expressing delight at "tr33", which is also l33t speak for "tree". So unless you are going to explain it, we're just going to assume that you are hiding something juicy. Does it involve trees?
(2) There's no gb 'public persona' to suffer detriment.... one and the same face to face, on the phone, in cyberspace. Ask my close friends or my Mom.
I'm not really saying that you're any different in your public life outside of this forum. It's simply tit-for-tat. If you want to accuse Sunburnt of having this duplicitous façade, without any proof whatsoever, then the same can be said of you. I don't need to defend her, and I feel pretty silly doing all of this, but she is the same in private as she is in public, the only difference is that she's a bit more fun in private (aren't we all?).
(3) Your dismissal of this brief exchange connotes an unexpected display of weak willed cowardice.
Not true, I could argue with you in public all day if I had the time and the inclination, but I don't. I sent you a private message, which you still haven't read, out of stubbornness I'm guessing. That was to explain a few things, and to ask you if you wanted clarification on any other issues. Calling me a coward when I want to spare the other inhabitants of the General Forum the tedious history and laborious debate is not cowardice. It's Forum Quality Control.
(4) You, my potential friend, took issue in public with an open/forthright opinion regarding a lady held in high esteem whom I speak with plainly.
Again, you are referring to something vague in the past. I cannot discern the identity of the lady that you speak of, nor the incident, as I have taken issue with so many people over the years. Furthermore, no ladies here are held in high esteem, apart from Nordlys, but she would kill me if I called her a lady.
(5) We speak here.
I'm waiting.