28 Mar 05
1 edit
Originally posted by shavixmirI've read about the phenomenon where men are castrated but still can get erections. It was documented as far back as ancient Egypt, when it was used on the body guards who protected the princess. However, even though men can get an erection there are two things that are kinda important:
What a bloody impossible question!
I do think Anne Rice is a contender though. Her vampire series sucked the peanuts out of shite through a straw.
She also wrote a book about a young boy (in the 1800's) who has his balls chopped off ...[text shortened]...
EDIT: Human mails???
See, I've got escargots on the brain!
1) they can not ejaculate.
2) once they realize they can't ejaculate, guess what? They can't get an erection after that.
The human mind is indeed a strange thing.
28 Mar 05
Originally posted by seraphimvultureYes this thread was inspired by Kev....sorry for not giving the mention 😉
Being the inspiration for this thread, I'll copy and paste my post from the Godfather 1 vs. Godfather 2 thread:
Forget the movies. Has anyone read the new The Godfather Returns book by Mark Winegardener? It is... BY FAR.... the WORST book I've ever read in my entire life. I've never even seen a movie I hated as much as this book. There are lite ...[text shortened]... it. Completely. The Godfather 3 was The Godfather 2 compared to this freakin' thing.
-Kev
28 Mar 05
Originally posted by Joe FistOh. Did he write: Do andriods dream of robot sheep, by any chance?
Asimov is a sci-fi writer, I don't recall him having anything to do with Rand. Both the Fountainhead and Atlas were pretty boring overall.....
John Galt
So, what's that got to do with Atlas shrugged?
Man you lot are doing my head in.
28 Mar 05
Originally posted by jimslyp69What is the controversial part of that response. Surely you know if you liked it or not. By the way the so called Holy Bible is not a book, but is a book of books. Which book(s) did you not like?
Here's a controversial one.........
The Bible.
28 Mar 05
1 edit
Originally posted by jimslyp69I had to look it up for the exact formulation. From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Laws_of_Robotics
What are these 3 laws of robotics then?
1. A robot may not harm a human being, or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence, as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.