Originally posted by utherpendragonAs far as I can ascertain, 'she' has made her way through the top 500 in the ratings list...poor old 'philomena' has certainly spread her wings overnight...
I just got the same pm from the same user and have sent feed back.
User 685810
The message limit for users was accidentally raised allowing this scammer to send hundreds of messages, which was really unhelpful. (Slaps own wrist for that one).
All deleted now, and the user banned.
I don't want to discuss this too much publically, as this is a cat and mouse game where it will eventually become too much effort for the spammer and they will move on to easier pastures.
Originally posted by RevRSleekerThat seems like a counter-intuitive choice. Maybe it
As far as I can ascertain, 'she' has made her way through the top 500 in the ratings list...
spammers don\'t deserve personal pronouns
believes in the theory that anyone who is good at chess must necessarily be bad at human interaction and easy to scam. If so, it's forgotten that engines don't read PMs 😛.
Richard
Originally posted by Shallow BlueNice theory, and not without a degree of truth I'm sure lol..also, I sent a PM to some top 10 chap MONTHS AGO, the last time I could check it he still hadn't opened it 😉
That seems like a counter-intuitive choice. Maybe it[hidden]spammers don\'t deserve personal pronouns[/hidden] believes in the theory that anyone who is good at chess must necessarily be bad at human interaction and easy to scam. If so, it's forgotten that engines don't read PMs 😛.
Richard
Originally posted by Shallow BlueEver heard about Eliza?
That seems like a counter-intuitive choice. Maybe it[hidden]spammers don\'t deserve personal pronouns[/hidden] believes in the theory that anyone who is good at chess must necessarily be bad at human interaction and easy to scam. If so, it's forgotten that engines don't read PMs 😛.
Richard