I note that the three chessboards on the home page are now "recent checkmates".
Sadly, I am now less likely to spend any time looking at those boards. I find that the games worth exploring are those between strong players; and those games tend to end in resignation, not checkmate.
What do you think?
Originally posted by John of ReadingI agree. Every once in a while I'd find interesting games to bookmark. While I do see interesting checkmates now, I won't find any games to bookmark, because (1) the games are already over and (2) as the original poster said, games between stronger players tend not to end in checkmate, and these are usually the more instructive and interesting games. How much interest and instruction can I get from a 900 vs. 1100 game in which one player drops a queen on the 8th move and the other promotes 2 queens for an overwhelming but unnecessary material advantage, then checkmate the loser by accident?
I note that the three chessboards on the home page are now "recent checkmates".
Sadly, I am now less likely to spend any time looking at those boards. I find that the games worth exploring are those between strong players; and those games tend to end in resignation, not checkmate.
What do you think?
SG is of course correct.
I don't even look at the front screen.
I spend a fair while (waiting for my opponents to move) just
scanning their games looking for what may have been an
interesting game.
I've leaned on this site quite heavily over the past few months for
my column.
http://chessedinburgh.co.uk/chandler.php
This place is a gold mine of games good and bad.
I just wish there was someway you could access them all in one
big DB. You could do a positon search and find out how many players
have fallen for a Scholars type mate