19 May 09
Originally posted by StarrmanThat rule wouldn't hurt you much.
Yes, perhaps it could also include grounds for instant dismissal for smug, self-righteous trolls.
You could just use your PFC get out of jail free card and you'ld be out of self-righteous troll jail before you could say rumpledarvlay.
19 May 09
Originally posted by Red NightWhat a crybaby.
That rule wouldn't hurt you much.
You could just use your PFC get out of jail free card and you'ld be out of self-righteous troll jail before you could say rumpledarvlay.
I suggest the TOS be amended so that all decisions by Russ must be approved, in advance, by Red Night. That is, after all, the only thing that would keep him and the TSM happy.
19 May 09
1 edit
Originally posted by StarrmanThere is nothing inherently wrong with being smug, or self-righteous as long as you are in the right.
Yes, perhaps it could also include grounds for instant dismissal for smug, self-righteous trolls.
If you want people to not be smug/self-righteous, then be correct yourself and the other person will not be able to fall into that position.
19 May 09
1 edit
Originally posted by uzlessCould you please direct me to the section of the TOS which states that the Site Admins cannot reinstate someone they banned if they so desire?
With that farce of re-instating darvy directly opposite of the TOS, I have declared an opposite day for uzless. All posts will be well-wishes, supportive, and helpful comments.
I enjoy your posts phlabibit. Your bring light and levity. If you were a sundae I would lick you.
Thank you.
19 May 09
Originally posted by uzless...and the "right" is whatever you believe in. 🙂
There is nothing inherently wrong with being smug, or self-righteous as long as you are in the right.
If you want people to not be smug/self-righteous, then be correct yourself and the other person will not be able to fall into that position.
20 May 09
3 edits
Originally posted by Red NightThat is a good question.
Should the TOS be amended to refelct the new reality that the rules do not apply to members of certain clans and groups?
I think that certain Non-Subs (not all) should be limited to so many posts a day, so we don't have to put up with so much of their drivel. Perhaps 10 like is done with the PM's would be a perfect number?
We the paying subs would say who these Non-Subs would be.
20 May 09
2 edits
Originally posted by Raven69Perhaps while were at it, get rid of anyone with a 69 at the end or beginning of their name as it is a known sexual postition, and this is a 13+ Site! Doesn't matter if they are actually 69 either!
Well well, looks who's getting all elitist...
Well not them actually, just the number 69. 😛
20 May 09
2 edits
Originally posted by Very RustyWhile I agree that it would be nice to limit certain people's posting ability for all of our sanity, I believe in free speech.
That is a good question.
I think that certain Non-Subs (not all) should be limited to so many posts a day, so we don't have to put up with so much of their drivel. Perhaps 10 like is done with the PM's would be a perfect number?
We the paying subs would say who these Non-Subs would be.
Every moron, from defrauder to crowley, has the same right to spout their idiotic opinions as every other user.