15 Sep 09
Originally posted by mazattackWithout wanting to be a pedant (who am I kidding?)...
You can castle queenside or kingside, with king or less well known, queen.
If you castle and your rook goes through, or onto, an attacked square that is fine, but your king cannot pass through, or land on a check.
If the rook lands on an attacked square when you castle, that would mean the king has passed through check...
15 Sep 09
1 edit
The Korchnoi story.
Originally posted by DawgHaus on the 26th June 2009
In the 21st game of the 1974 Karpov-Korchnoi match,
Karpov's 17th move Bxd5 attacked Korchnoi's R on h1.
If he moved the Rook that allowed Nf3+ winning the Q
(as would recapturing the B).
Korchnoi asked the arbiter if it was legal to castle with the Rook
under attack. It was, and he won quickly with 18.O-O!
The End
- Joined
- 11 Jan 09
- Moves
- 66198
15 Sep 09
Originally posted by mazattackJust wanting clarification, you can castle your Queen?
You can castle queenside or kingside, with king or less well known, queen.
If you castle and your rook goes through, or onto, an attacked square that is fine, but your king cannot pass through, or land on a check.
15 Sep 09
Originally posted by greenpawn34I was going to refer to this, but I could tell early on in the thread that I was already late to the party!
[b]The Korchnoi story.
Originally posted by DawgHaus on the 26th June 2009
In the 21st game of the 1974 Karpov-Korchnoi match,
Karpov's 17th move Bxd5 attacked Korchnoi's R on h1.
If he moved the Rook that allowed Nf3+ winning the Q
(as would recapturing the B).
Korchnoi asked the arbiter if it was legal to castle with the Rook ...[text shortened]... 16. Bxg5 Qxg5 17. Qxg5 Bxd5 18. O-O Bxc4 19. f4 1-0 [/pgn]
The End[/b]
16 Sep 09
Folks who are still bewildered I recommend looking up the rules by yourself on Fide`s own site its in handbook under miscellaneous which is ridiculous to consider the laws of chess miscellaneous but that is where the rules can be found.Believe what humans say at your own risk.