Originally posted by DejectionThis tournament has some very good games with the grob.
I would like to be able to play an opening that immediately takes my opponent out of their book. Since I'm a more tactical player, i thought 1. g4 would be a good choice. Does anyone know where i can find help with this opening over the internet?
Tournament 1667
Originally posted by DejectionAlso, never forget Wikipedia!
I would like to be able to play an opening that immediately takes my opponent out of their book. Since I'm a more tactical player, i thought 1. g4 would be a good choice. Does anyone know where i can find help with this opening over the internet?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grob_Opening
Originally posted by KnightStalker47it looks like all the games history isnt working, or at least the ones i clicked..
This tournament has some very good games with the grob.
Tournament 1667
Originally posted by DejectionAlso,
I would like to be able to play an opening that immediately takes my opponent out of their book. Since I'm a more tactical player, i thought 1. g4 would be a good choice. Does anyone know where i can find help with this opening over the internet?
http://www.logicalchess.com/resources/openings/grob/index.html
http://nestore.mysteria.cz/
I think it would be a wonderful idea just to forget the Grob.
I've always done well with it, but the sequence 1. g4, d5; 2. h3 (Basman's recommendation), e5; 3. Bg2, h5! is tough to meet.
If you like something not analyzed to death, try 1. c3. Oh, by the way, the Grob has been analyzed extensively, and if you must play it, get Basman's book on it, bearing in mind that he himself eventually gave up on it!
Originally posted by cubsYep. An early ...h5 pretty much refutes the Grob.
I think it would be a wonderful idea just to forget the Grob.
I've always done well with it, but the sequence 1. g4, d5; 2. h3 (Basman's recommendation), e5; 3. Bg2, h5! is tough to meet.
1.g4 is good as a surprise weapon against weak opposition, but against anyone half decent (or indeed anyone with access to a database!) it really leaves white in all sorts of trouble; ie Game 4449001
Originally posted by SquelchbelchIf Grob is useful only against weaker opposition how IM Basman managed to beat IMs and GMs with such inferior opening?
Yep. An early ...h5 pretty much refutes the Grob.
1.g4 is good as a surprise weapon against weak opposition, but against anyone half decent (or indeed anyone with access to a database!) it really leaves white in all sorts of trouble; ie Game 4449001
Originally posted by KorchHe is a tactical genius who, for some reason known only to himself, decided to specialise in oddities.
If Grob is useful only against weaker opposition how IM Basman managed to beat IMs and GMs with such inferior opening?
Look at his Grob games on chesslive.de - he lost many against weaker opposition when he could probably have won playing sound openings.
His record on www.chesslive.de with 1.g4:
P=28
W=11
L=9
D=9
Hardly resounding for a leading expert.
I know you like the Grob & know it well Korch. You must admit the early ...h5 plan is extremely good for black.
Originally posted by SquelchbelchAbout Basman - his statistics itself gives nothing without taking into account opposition he have been played against.
He is a tactical genius who, for some reason known only to himself, decided to specialise in oddities.
Look at his Grob games on chesslive.de - he lost many against weaker opposition when he could probably have won playing sound openings.
His record on www.chesslive.de with 1.g4:
P=28
W=11
L=9
D=9
Hardly resounding for a leading expert.
I kn ...[text shortened]... the Grob & know it well Korch. You must admit the early ...h5 plan is extremely good for black.
I agree that plan with e5 and h5 is one of the best replies against Grob, but in my opinion if white knows how to play black cant get more than equality. And in my dictionary "sound" means "gives at least equality".
Dragon Fire is the main Grob player on here, I think. I suggest learn a lot of responses to the Grob OTB, as if you play it and they catch you by surprise with a particular variant, you are pretty much sunk. I personally prefer castling queenside as Black against the Grob, particularly after releasing the bishop by dubiously accepting the pawn sac'. Then White either castles on his only side, or pawn storms and leaves his king in the centre.
Anyway, you probably don't want to listen to me, listen to Korch, Squelchbelch and Dragon Fire.
Thanks for reading.
🙂