Only Chess
14 Jun 07
14 Jun 07
3 edits
Due to his bragging (and showing himself as "arrogant jackass" ) in thread "I challenge" I` challenge RahimK to 2 games (white and black), because I want to give him a lesson showing that he is far from perfect. Time control - 1/7.
If RahimK will refuse this challenge, he will show himself as coward, who does afraid to play against stronger players. (And I will remind him that every time when he will start to hassle or brag in this forum 😉 ).
So RahimK - take these 2 games or shut up.
14 Jun 07
Originally posted by KorchNot another one of these threads!
Due to his bragging (and showing himself as "arrogant jackass" ) in thread "I challenge" I` challenge RahimK to 2 games (white and black), because I want to give him a lesson showing that he is far from perfect. Time control - 1/7.
If RahimK will refuse this challenge, he will show himself as coward, who does afraid to play against stronger players. (And I ...[text shortened]... ll start to hassle or brag in this forum 😉 ).
So RahimK - take these 2 games or shut up.
Ah what the hell.
14 Jun 07
Originally posted by KorchIsn't the easiest way to challenge someone just to PM him or send him a challenge rather than start a thread on it.
Due to his bragging (and showing himself as "arrogant jackass" ) in thread "I challenge" I` challenge RahimK to 2 games (white and black), because I want to give him a lesson showing that he is far from perfect. Time control - 1/7.
If RahimK will refuse this challenge, he will show himself as coward, who does afraid to play against stronger players. (And I ...[text shortened]... ll start to hassle or brag in this forum 😉 ).
So RahimK - take these 2 games or shut up.
I sent RahamK a number of challenges some time ago but he didn't accept any of them as (at that time) he didn't want to play any more correspondence chess (fine by me). Some people just enjoy reading and writing in the forums, some never do that and just play chess, a few do both.
One should use the site in whatever way pleases them.
14 Jun 07
1 edit
Originally posted by Dragon FireI have sent challenges to him. And creating of this thread gives some chances that he will accept them.
Isn't the easiest way to challenge someone just to PM him or send him a challenge rather than start a thread on it.
I sent RahamK a number of challenges some time ago but he didn't accept any of them as (at that time) he didn't want to play any more correspondence chess (fine by me). Some people just enjoy reading and writing in the forums, some never ...[text shortened]... and just play chess, a few do both.
One should use the site in whatever way pleases them.
14 Jun 07
Hi Korsh,
Though not as arrogant as RahimK, I would like to play you as well in an attempt to get revenge for the blitz game you beat me up in a few weeks ago. I tried to challenge you to two 1/7 games, but you're only accepting timeouts of 3 days or above. Do you fancy a couple of 1/7 games?
14 Jun 07
Originally posted by Fat LadyCan`t challenge you - "This player is only accepting challenges from players with a rating above 5000" 😉
Hi Korsh,
Though not as arrogant as RahimK, I would like to play you as well in an attempt to get revenge for the blitz game you beat me up in a few weeks ago. I tried to challenge you to two 1/7 games, but you're only accepting timeouts of 3 days or above. Do you fancy a couple of 1/7 games?
14 Jun 07
Originally posted by KorchJesus wept - how arrogant is that?
Due to his bragging (and showing himself as "arrogant jackass" ) in thread "I challenge" I` challenge RahimK to 2 games (white and black), because I want to give him a lesson showing that he is far from perfect. Time control - 1/7.
If RahimK will refuse this challenge, he will show himself as coward, who does afraid to play against stronger players. (And I ...[text shortened]... ll start to hassle or brag in this forum 😉 ).
So RahimK - take these 2 games or shut up.
14 Jun 07
Originally posted by KorchOh yes, I forgot about that. I've changed it now.
Can`t challenge you - "This player is only accepting challenges from players with a rating above 5000" 😉
It will be nice to play a strong player that doesn't use an engine. Not that I'm suggesting that the current strong player I'm playing against uses an engine.
14 Jun 07
1 edit
Originally posted by Fat LadyOne problem again 🙁
Oh yes, I forgot about that. I've changed it now.
It will be nice to play a strong player that doesn't use an engine. Not that I'm suggesting that the current strong player I'm playing against uses an engine.
"This player is already playing their self imposed maximum concurrent games (0)"