Go back
Chess puzzler, defending a theoritical kingside as

Chess puzzler, defending a theoritical kingside as

Only Chess

m
Look, it's a title!

Run, it's offensive!

Joined
26 Aug 04
Moves
3708
Clock
19 Dec 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Really? What move is your Queen rook developed on? Take a look and come back with the answer. Your other pieces are not properly developed either and your Queenside is not aggressively mobilized. How long does your Bishop just sit at d7? You think that because you know a few opening moves you know the opening, but you don't. The theory behind ...[text shortened]... e used in counterattacking on the Queenside but you didn't. So he gained the advantage. Simple.
Queenside attacks are never deadly, kingside attacks are. Attack on the queenside, he can always just ignore it and go crazy and persue his kingside attack, you can't ignore a kingside attack forever, evetually you have to defend and play what you call "passively".

m
Look, it's a title!

Run, it's offensive!

Joined
26 Aug 04
Moves
3708
Clock
19 Dec 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

BTW, the traditional "queenside attack" counter-attack of the Sicilian is downright USELESS against a Bb5 or closed Sicilian variation, it's only useful in the open variations, which nobody plays.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
19 Dec 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mateulose
Queenside attacks are never deadly, kingside attacks are. Attack on the queenside, he can always just ignore it and go crazy and persue his kingside attack, you can't ignore a kingside attack forever, evetually you have to defend and play what you call "passively".
I give up; you have no clue how to play the Sicilian. You don't move your Queenside rook until move 39 and your Bishop sits around uselessly on d7 until move 46!!!! BTW, your analysis is also dead wrong; Qd8 wasn't the mistake. Bxg5 opening up the f-file for his rooks was. You should have played Bd4+ followed by f6 forcing the Knight to retreat and breaking the attack. That's how you stop attacks; you trade off or use your pawns to force his pieces to give way. YOU DON"T GO OUT OF YOUR WAY TO OPEN UP ATTACKING FILES FOR YOUR OPPONENT! I told you this in another thread: the opening up of a position favors the better developed side. You opened up the position with Bxg5; that was a serious POSITIONAL error. I'm sure you'll have some wiseass answer like the moronic post you just made. When you win hundreds of games playing the Sicilian like I have then you can come back and tell me how to play it, not before because you obviously don't have a clue.

m
Look, it's a title!

Run, it's offensive!

Joined
26 Aug 04
Moves
3708
Clock
19 Dec 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
I give up; you have no clue how to play the Sicilian. You don't move your Queenside rook until move 39 and your Bishop sits around uselessly on d7 until move 46!!!! BTW, your analysis is also dead wrong; Qd8 wasn't the mistake. Bxg5 opening up the f-file for his rooks was. You should have played Bd4+ followed by f6 forcing the Knight to retrea ...[text shortened]... u can come back and tell me how to play it, not before because you obviously don't have a clue.
Ok, so according to you, I should treat the Bb5 and closed Sicilian crap like an open Sicilian and attack queenside, yet then, you tell me not to open lines, argh jesus, dude, you're confusing. . .

X
Cancerous Bus Crash

p^2.sin(phi)

Joined
06 Sep 04
Moves
25076
Clock
19 Dec 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

When you are behind in development don't open lines for your opponent.
When you are playing the Sicilian develop towards a queenside attack (before getting behind in development preferably).

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
19 Dec 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mateulose
Ok, so according to you, I should treat the Bb5 and closed Sicilian crap like an open Sicilian and attack queenside, yet then, you tell me not to open lines, argh jesus, dude, you're confusing. . .
It's not hard to figure out. The better developed side is the one that should open the position; so first DEVELOP YOUR PIECES! Don't wait until move 39 to move a Rook! Secondly, you can open a closed Sicilian by forcing d5; I've got at least 15 wins against closed Sicilians on this site using that tactic. So try it or cry about it; I really don't care which you do. And thirdly, you don't open attacking files onto yer King! Only a complete novice who doesn't know better does that; your rating says you know better but you can't even look at the game afterwards and see it.

m
Look, it's a title!

Run, it's offensive!

Joined
26 Aug 04
Moves
3708
Clock
19 Dec 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
I give up; you have no clue how to play the Sicilian. You don't move your Queenside rook until move 39 and your Bishop sits around uselessly on d7 until move 46!!!! BTW, your analysis is also dead wrong; Qd8 wasn't the mistake. Bxg5 opening up the f-file for his rooks was. You should have played Bd4+ followed by f6 forcing the Knight to retrea ...[text shortened]... u can come back and tell me how to play it, not before because you obviously don't have a clue.
Ok, where would you of put the bishop and queen's rook, little genius? Bare in mind, I didn't really have the time to move those peices until that move number because I had to save my king. The only way to "develop" that queen's rook would be to play it on b1 or c1, I'm giving you 30 seconds to explain how that would make one IOATA of a difference whether the rook is on c1, b1, or a1, where it was located. As for the bishop seiting uselessly on d7, what do you suggest Einstein, Bc8 followed by Bb7, wow, that takes another 2 moves. So basicly you suggest I IGNORE the kingside attack for no more then 4 FRIGGIN MOVES so I can push a few pawns queenside with a fianchettoed bishop and a rook on c1, I fail to see the balance in such a situation, by the time I'm done doing what you suggest, I would be toast before the queenside attack even begins.

J

back in business

Joined
25 Aug 04
Moves
1264
Clock
19 Dec 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mateulose
[b]but didn't see f4.
if u really didnt see f4 coming, then your problem is very bad calculation. But, i think, you just didnt pay attention to it...you saw the tactic of pinning piece (as you said) and then just played the move, instantly (am i right?). C`mon this is e-mail chess, you have hours to ponder your move, so why arent you more careful. f4-move is not hard to see if you little study the position. Calculate, dont rush...it is clear that you will never improve if you dont take time studying chess deeply (Not only openings!) and playing slowly.
Some wise chessmaster has said: "Your game is as good as your worst move"

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
19 Dec 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mateulose
Ok, where would you of put the bishop and queen's rook, little genius? Bare in mind, I didn't really have the time to move those peices until that move number because I had to save my king. The only way to "develop" that queen's rook would be to play it on b1 or c1, I'm giving you 30 seconds to explain how that would make one IOATA of a difference wh ...[text shortened]... time I'm done doing what you suggest, I would be toast before the queenside attack even begins.
Keep losing yer games, wiseass; you had plenty of time - the Queen didn't even get out until move 14! I'm through with this thread and talking to a punk like you.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.