Go back
CTS rating = RHP rating

CTS rating = RHP rating

Only Chess

l

Joined
11 Aug 08
Moves
9693
Clock
08 Nov 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Hi everyone,

Just wondering whether a CTS rating calculated using the Glicko rating system could be used to gauge somebody's RHP or FIDE ranking or can they not be compared in any way?

Cheers,

lordgledhill

h

Joined
25 Apr 06
Moves
5939
Clock
08 Nov 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

CTS + 16 ~ RHP :-)

E

Joined
28 Mar 07
Moves
5104
Clock
09 Nov 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

CTS 1588
RHP 1593

d

Joined
29 Mar 07
Moves
1260
Clock
09 Nov 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

CTS 1365
RHP 1758

K
Chess Warrior

Riga

Joined
05 Jan 05
Moves
24932
Clock
09 Nov 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

CTS 1736
RHP 2262

i
SelfProclaimedTitler

Joined
06 Feb 06
Moves
23543
Clock
09 Nov 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

The correlation between the two is extremly looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooose.

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
09 Nov 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Perhaps there's more to chess than just tactics.

w
If Theres Hell Below

We're All Gonna Go!

Joined
10 Sep 05
Moves
10228
Clock
09 Nov 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

cts 1628
rhp 1991

J

benching

Joined
17 Jul 08
Moves
1218
Clock
09 Nov 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

I fail to see how a sane person can compare a tactical lottery (read CTS) with a situation where you have several days to make a move (RHP). Chess is much more than "a winning chess move". If you want an inflated ego beat up your little bro at chess and call yourself Kasparov of da house.

l

Joined
11 Aug 08
Moves
9693
Clock
09 Nov 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Jie
I fail to see how a sane person can compare a tactical lottery (read CTS) with a situation where you have several days to make a move (RHP). Chess is much more than "a winning chess move". If you want an inflated ego beat up your little bro at chess and call yourself Kasparov of da house.
My word Jie.

That was a little aggressive.

Who were you responding to?

E

Joined
28 Mar 07
Moves
5104
Clock
09 Nov 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

E

Joined
28 Mar 07
Moves
5104
Clock
09 Nov 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

wow, how come everyone's rating on CTS is low, but they are at least 300+ on rhp? EXCEPT FOR ME THAT IS:'(

J

benching

Joined
17 Jul 08
Moves
1218
Clock
09 Nov 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by lordgledhill
My word Jie.

That was a little aggressive.

Who were you responding to?
To the OP. Can't the OP see Emlasker is crying because there is little correlation between CTS and RHP?

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
09 Nov 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by EmLasker
wow, how come everyone's rating on CTS is low, but they are at least 300+ on rhp? EXCEPT FOR ME THAT IS:'(
That's an idication that you are relying alot on tactics for your wins. In other words, you have alot of room for growth once you start to figure out the strategic end of the game.

w
If Theres Hell Below

We're All Gonna Go!

Joined
10 Sep 05
Moves
10228
Clock
09 Nov 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by EmLasker
wow, how come everyone's rating on CTS is low, but they are at least 300+ on rhp? EXCEPT FOR ME THAT IS:'(
a high CTS rating relative to RHP rating is most likely an indication of solving at a very low accuracy level.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.