Go back
Equivalent ratings

Equivalent ratings

Only Chess

P

Mumbai,India

Joined
09 Apr 03
Moves
2787
Clock
20 Dec 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Hi,
I am around 1600 rated here, I dont have a Fide rating.
What could be the equivalent fide rating for a 1600 player on RHP.
Thanks

SS

Joined
15 Aug 05
Moves
96595
Clock
20 Dec 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

o
onyx2007

watching you...

Joined
06 Feb 06
Moves
27029
Clock
20 Dec 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
Yare... me hearties!

M
sorozatgyilkos

leรถlรฉs ellenfeleim

Joined
15 Jul 06
Moves
40507
Clock
20 Dec 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by onyx2006
Yare... me hearties!
pieces of eight... pieces of eight !

o
onyx2007

watching you...

Joined
06 Feb 06
Moves
27029
Clock
20 Dec 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

lmao! ๐Ÿ˜€

z

127.0.0.1

Joined
27 Oct 05
Moves
158564
Clock
20 Dec 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

This really needs to make it into the faq...

SS

Joined
15 Aug 05
Moves
96595
Clock
20 Dec 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

T

London

Joined
04 Jun 06
Moves
929
Clock
20 Dec 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

FICS have a Surveybot that collects FIDE & ECF ratings of its members, and then produces a formula that converts between them as far as possible. Obviously when two groups of players have overlapping members, some correspondence between ratings is likely - it's not an a priori fact there will be none. Incidentally - my standard rating on FICS predicts my OTB rating very accurately.

Maybe similar statistical work would be interesting here, rather than just pooh-poohing the idea with pure reason?

z

127.0.0.1

Joined
27 Oct 05
Moves
158564
Clock
20 Dec 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by TommyC
FICS have a Surveybot that collects FIDE & ECF ratings of its members, and then produces a formula that converts between them as far as possible. Obviously when two groups of players have overlapping members, some correspondence between ratings is likely - it's not an a priori fact there will be none. Incidentally - my standard rating on FICS predicts my OTB ...[text shortened]... stical work would be interesting here, rather than just pooh-poohing the idea with pure reason?
You can surely create a decent approximation, however since they are differnt types of chess!!! it is going to have a much greater rate of failure. For instance I play USCF OTB and USCF CC.

Consider player A whom I play a lot because he enters all the same tournies as me.
He is a 1550 OTB player at regular time controls 30 min + by USCF standards.
He is a 1400 quick chess player (at least 10 min game, up to 1 hour, yes there is overlap).
He is an 1700 rated correspondence player.

I also know a kid who is a
1400 regular player
1500 blitz
1100 correspondence.

Finally, I know a third player. He is a
1800 rated OTB regular game player
1770 blitz
1803 corr.

Please tell me how one can possibly make a model that accounts for all three of these with any sort of accuracy??

m

Joined
25 Sep 04
Moves
1779
Clock
20 Dec 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

You make a good point. My case: chesshere 1420, rhp 1560, playchess 1965, ccla 2025, otb 2095 (old…20+ years ago), chessworld 2275. Your call as to which one is most accurate. I don’t play speed chess, but if I did, I’d be rated about 1000…not too quick on my mental feet.๐Ÿ™‚

A

Joined
12 Oct 06
Moves
984
Clock
20 Dec 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
I think the main problem is that this isn't really a normal forum. Most forums are in the format of IPB or Vbulletein. If that was the case then I think this would make the forums alot better. It'll stop the same topics comming up over and over, you'd be clearly able to see staff members, report bad posts, proper search function and loads more which would be beneficial for the site.

T

London

Joined
04 Jun 06
Moves
929
Clock
20 Dec 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zebano
You can surely create a decent approximation, however since they are differnt types of chess!!! it is going to have a much greater rate of failure. For instance I play USCF OTB and USCF CC.

Consider player A whom I play a lot because he enters all the same tournies as me.
He is a 1550 OTB player at regular time controls 30 min + by USCF standards.
He is ...[text shortened]... w one can possibly make a model that accounts for all three of these with any sort of accuracy??
I know it's an approximation, and there will always be some ambiguity and anomalies.

However - my point is, you really don't know what the statistics would say unless you run them to find out.

It's not as if you can't test for levels of correlation.

So why assume you know already the answer before finding it out?

w
If Theres Hell Below

We're All Gonna Go!

Joined
10 Sep 05
Moves
10228
Clock
20 Dec 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by masscat
I don’t play speed chess, but if I did, I’d be rated about 1000…not too quick on my mental feet.๐Ÿ™‚
I know what that's like. my stats:

1744 rhp
1181 fics blitz

then there's the boy wonder jusuh, who is the polar opposite:

1551 rhp
1990 otb
2050 otb blitz
2300 playchess (if my memory serves me right)

quite many people here 200 pts lower than me are 400 pts higher on fics, so there really is huge variance depending on the type of chess, and the personalities I guess. it's like comparing 100m runners to marathon runners.

MS

Under Cover

Joined
25 Feb 04
Moves
28912
Clock
20 Dec 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

RHP around 1600
FICS Blitz around 1500
FICS Standard 2050
UCHESS Blitz around 1600
USCF OTB best approximation 1800 (based only on games against rated players, I haven't been rated)
Yahoo around 1600
pogo 1800-2000 with alot of variance

There's simply no correlation from site to site, nevermind with different forms of chess. Some are rated much higher here than OTB, and some are rated much lower. I agree, this question should somehow get added to a sticky post.

T

London

Joined
04 Jun 06
Moves
929
Clock
20 Dec 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

You must know that picking a handful of counter examples is too small and non-random a sample to draw conclusions from?

(I mean, I'm not much of a statistician, but I do know that at least.)

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.