Go back
European Chess International in Liverpool

European Chess International in Liverpool

Only Chess

NL

Joined
07 Nov 04
Moves
18861
Clock
11 Sep 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Fat Lady
According to the FIDE rules, the arbiter/controller is the person who decides on the outcome of the game. The person whose phone went off will get zero points, but the other player may get zero, half or a full point at the discretion of the arbiter.
I can't believe that is entirely the case. I once put this issue to the renowned arbiter Geurt Gijssen. The only time such an instance doesn't lead to a straight loss for the player whose mobile phone has gone off, would seem to be if it happens before his opponent has got to the board. If the opponent then failed to turn up before the default time, there would be a double default.

MR

Joined
19 Jun 06
Moves
847
Clock
12 Sep 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Katastroof
It's not that difficult to turn off a cellphone.Are people so addicted to their little toy they can't do without it for a few hours?
Some may be addicted, but I suspect that most of the time they just forget to turn it off. In Nigel's case, he actually did turn it off. He was forfeited when the phone's low battery alarm went off. 😞

K

Hollow earth

Joined
29 Apr 08
Moves
2472
Clock
12 Sep 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Mad Rook
Some may be addicted, but I suspect that most of the time they just forget to turn it off. In Nigel's case, he actually did turn it off. He was forfeited when the phone's low battery alarm went off. 😞
Hm,if the phone is turned off the battery alarm cannot go off.Or can it?I assume he set it to some sort of silent mode?

Anyway,I guess people will have to add it to their mental checklist before a game: 1.board and pieces? check! 2.pen + scoresheet? check! 3.am I fully clothed? check! 4.cellphone's off? check!
It's beyond my understanding.Guess I really am an old fart who lost touch with modern day society 😞

greenpawn34

e4

Joined
06 May 08
Moves
43363
Clock
12 Sep 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Mad Rook
Some may be addicted, but I suspect that most of the time they just forget to turn it off. In Nigel's case, he actually did turn it off. He was forfeited when the phone's low battery alarm went off. 😞
I wonder if he could sue the company.
He should do, that would put chess back in the headlines.
They (the press) only seem interested in chess when something
silly like this happens.

MR

Joined
19 Jun 06
Moves
847
Clock
12 Sep 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Katastroof
Hm,if the phone is turned off the battery alarm cannot go off.Or can it?I assume he set it to some sort of silent mode?
According to the ChessVibes report, Nigel claims to have turned off the phone, and he thinks the low battery warning somehow must have overridden the turned off status.

http://www.chessvibes.com/coverstory/nigel-short-vs-his-mobile-0-1/

MR

Joined
19 Jun 06
Moves
847
Clock
12 Sep 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by greenpawn34
I wonder if he could sue the company.
He should do, that would put chess back in the headlines.
They (the press) only seem interested in chess when something
silly like this happens.
Yes! When in doubt, sue! It's the only litigious thing to do! 😀

N

The sky

Joined
05 Apr 05
Moves
10385
Clock
12 Sep 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Mad Rook
According to the ChessVibes report, Nigel claims to have turned off the phone, and he thinks the low battery warning somehow must have overridden the turned off status.

http://www.chessvibes.com/coverstory/nigel-short-vs-his-mobile-0-1/
A brilliant move by the phone!

K

Hollow earth

Joined
29 Apr 08
Moves
2472
Clock
12 Sep 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Think I'll buy a bunch of mobiles to sneak them in the jacket of my opponents with the alarm set(if I can figure out how LOL).In a few years I'll write history by being the world's weakest GM 😏

Actually,someone is bound to try this sooner or later.You can bet on it!

s

Joined
02 Jul 08
Moves
75
Clock
12 Sep 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

I was playing in the Scottish championships a couple of years ago. I had switched off my phone (in front of my opponent) but somehow managed to accidentally switch it on in my pocket during the game! The arbiter spoke to my opponent, who said he didn't want to win the game that way, so we continued. I was so put off by the incident though that I offered a draw (at move 10!)-just couldn't concentrate.

Then a year or so ago in the National League (Scottish) I again switched off my phone, but during the game my alarm went off! Again my opponent refused to take the win.

Both times I was prepared to lose the game as it was my own stupid fault, but if the rule is to prevent cheating, then it's good that an arbiter has some discretion in these cases.

Now I triple-check my phone is off, and then bury it in molten lead 7 miles underground during games just to be sure : )

J

benching

Joined
17 Jul 08
Moves
1218
Clock
14 Sep 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Fat Lady
I spotted one other RHPer in the crosstable, but he prefers to stay anonymous....
What's your obsession with naming people in the forums? You have provided the unsolicited names of more people than Jason. This is a tad immature.

JoL
Curb Your Enthusiasm

London

Joined
04 Nov 07
Moves
4259
Clock
14 Sep 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Katastroof
Anyway,I guess people will have to add it to their mental checklist before a game: 1.board and pieces? check! 2.pen + scoresheet? check! 3.am I fully clothed? check! 4.cellphone's off? check!
Well yes they should ... although personally I don't have to bother with point three as I always play naked.

When I work I have to have my phone off 90% of the day. I've never - and I mean NEVER - had my phone ring or make any kind of noise when I need it not to. It's because for professional reasons I need to not have it ring and therefore I make sure it won't ring.

For similar reasons I've never had my phone go off in a theatre or at the cinema.

It's really quite easy and just involves giving a little thought and respect to other people.

FL

Joined
21 Feb 06
Moves
6830
Clock
15 Sep 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

David Tebb won in round 7, bringing him up to 50% for the tournament so far.

It was an interesting game where David clearly had the initiative. He offered an exchange sac, which his opponent declined, then David won the exchange himself a move or two later, forcing his opponent to resign.



Who says the bishop pair is significantly better than two knights?

T
Mr T

I pity the fool!

Joined
22 Jan 05
Moves
22874
Clock
15 Sep 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

I remember a time when I was playing a county match and felt my phone start vibrating in my pocket. It was not too loud so my opponent didnt hear but it went on and on and on so eventually I got up and went outside to give whoever it was a good bit of abuse for ringing me in an important match. It turned out that it was a message from myself, reminding me that I had chess that day.... D'OH!

FL

Joined
21 Feb 06
Moves
6830
Clock
17 Sep 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Adams vs Short today. Should be interesting as Short seems to be playing pretty well recently. The game can be seen live here: http://www.liverpoolchessinternational.co.uk/live.htm from 2:00pm onwards.

s

Joined
02 Jul 08
Moves
75
Clock
17 Sep 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Should be a good one, but my money is on Adams. He has white, and needs to win.

Short is much better with the white pieces than he is with black (more so than many other top players in my opinion) so he'll have a tough time I imagine.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.