Originally posted by EdTrice1. wundervoll
OK, my turn to the play the "negative implication game". To make it easier for you, just refute these statements "by number" in your replies.
1. If there is no real wordlwide interest in Gothic Chess, why a complete page in German?
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gothic_Chess
2. If there is no real wordlwide interest in Gothic Chess, why were there pro ...[text shortened]... 2006/annex48.pdf+Gothic+Chess&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=78
I think I'll stop there for now.
2. It is an International news story - Let us ALL support it
3. Voulez-vous Coucher Avec Moi
Sorry wrong thread x
4. I am interested and so are my friends, we are the real chess fans
5. I love the interface - we can all play in harmony
6. Wow! I have asked santa for a set, although I will be happy with a basic one, *drools*
7. Bobby Fischer lives for chess - if he interested why aren't we (The woodpushers)
8. Mr Karpov lives for chess - if he interested why aren't we (The woodpushers)
9. Well despite the sexism in these forums Susan Polgar, and her 2 sisters, are 3 of the most important people in the development of recent chess, she looks forward
10. There is interest and the ship will sail whether we go onboard or not
11. супер
12. Pass, maths is too close to school, (lol)
13. Because 2006 has been a great year for chess, and it is going to get better
Now everyone stop arguing and support the Karpov v Fischer match
If it fails you can complain until then try to be kinder
thanks
:-)
Here are some of my thoughts on your questions. I haven't bothered answering the ones about foreign Wikipedia sites or message boards as I cannot read them.
2) Some computer programmers like this sort of thing. It's pointless trying to write the best chess program in the world because there's too many very strong commercial programs, so why not choose a less popular game, like Gothic Chess or Fischer Random Chess (http://www.xs4all.nl/~rpijl/html/20051.html - 19 entries in 2005).
4) 195 of the games involved "GothicInventor" (aka Ed Trice). There were 151 unique players (including guest and guest2), and without checking carefully I'd say that a core of about 15 people played 90% of the games.
This is fine and dandy for you people who like to play Gothic Chess, but it doesn't make it the global phenomenon you are trying to sell it as.
5) Because _you_ have a strong interest in Gothic Chess and _you_ wrote the program.
6) Perhaps you told him that there had been several very successful Gothic Chess tournaments with thousands of participants.
7) Perhaps you told Fischer or his representatives that there had been several very successful Gothic Chess tournaments with thousands of participants. Or perhaps the prize money you mentioned interested him.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but you didn't actually meet Fischer did you, let alone get his signature on any match agreement?
8) Karpov would doubtless play 12 games of any type whatsoever if he were to be promised $4,000,000 even if he loses.
9) Because she is the reserve if Fischer will not play in the match against Karpov. Presumably this means that she has been promised $4,000,000 even if she loses the match.
10) Because it's a journal about games, and Gothic Chess is a game. I'm sure they were delighted to have a paper by you submitted to them, just as they were to receive one about the game "Tigers and Goats" for the next issue.
12) Glicko is making his system look as important as possible by listing some of the organisations which have adopted his formulae:
"... and variations of the Glicko system have been adapted for several commercial internet gaming organizations such as ChronX, Case's Ladder, and the Gothic Chess Association."
Originally posted by Fat Lady
10) Because it's a journal about games, and Gothic Chess is a game. I'm sure they were delighted to have a paper by you submitted to them, just as they were to receive one about the game "Tigers and Goats" for the next issue.
I challenge you to publish ANY article for the ICGA. Even write about something in chess if you want. You have 12 calendar months to get it published. Let me know when it comes out.
Perhaps now you will see my point.
Originally posted by Fat LadyTo me, I interpret that as popularity = sales = money.
I've never denied that you have put a lot of time and effort into marketing Gothic Chess.
What I do question is the current popularity of Gothic Chess.
We sold 53,000 sets since December 2000.
We do about $85,000/year in software sales, which is not that great.
Our high-volume drop ship orders do about $200,000/year.
But the money from doing the annual scholarship event brings in over a quarter million in profit.
Since the entire US Chess Federation is run on about a $7,000,000/year budget, how popular do we really have to become in your mind?
Number of sales of the chess set is certainly one valid way of measuring the popularity of Gothic Chess. Unfortunately I don't believe your figures and I don't suppose there's any way of verifying them. And no, I don't want to trust your word.
The number of players and games being played online is another way of measuring the popularity of Gothic Chess. These aren't too bad, maybe fifteen serious players, another couple of hundred who have tried it once or twice, and a couple of thousand games played in total.
Number of people willing to pay $100 to enter a real over the board tournament is, in my mind, an excellent way of measuring the popularity of Gothic Chess, and you are insisting that you have had well over a thousand people entering from 2003 to 2005 (and almost a thousand in 2002).
Here it is in your own words on page five of this thread:
(Start of Ed Trice quote)
The 2002 college scholarship event was just for 1 year's tuition. We had 895 participants.
In 2003 we had 1640.
In 2004, over 2000.
In 2005 we offered 2 years' tuition, and it was a fiasco, with over 4000 registrations, maybe 60% of the registrations coming within 1 month of the event, and people showing up "at the door" even though radio ads were mentioning the tournament was, in fact, closed.
There were problems turning people away, let's leave it at that.
(End of Ed Trice quote)
If I thought this was true I would wholeheartedly agree that Gothic Chess is the next Big Thing.
But it's not true, is it Ed?
One of the things that points towards gothic chess not being too popular is the online gothic server...
Say you have a competition coming up and you want to take names and kick ar**.....what do you do? Study, study, study, play, play, play, since gothic chess doesnt have any theory books(as far as I know) the only way to prepare for a compeition is through play. Now naturally you will want strong oppositon.....we all know what its like when our girlfriends or boyfriends say lets play a game of chess.....so they must turn to the online community for their games, the only place I could find to play gothic chess online was at Ed's site.....how many people do you think there are normally logged in practicing gothic chess for all these mass compeitions? Well the highest iv seen so far has been 5. Now really if you are getting 1000+ dedicated players at each tournament dont you think there might be more than 5 people logged into the gothic chess online rooms.........the fact that the online server only has a max of 12 tables speaks volumes about how many peak people they expect to get.
The line about Gothic Chess having 20,000 members 1/3 of the USCF or something like that......do these members subscribe or is it just anyone whos ever played the game? The online chess communities for America social and more pro aimed both have lots of people....think about yahoo,pogo etc chess rooms always being highly populated and ICC gets 4000-5000 people at its peak each day so you would expect gothic chess which claims to get 4000 people at a single compeition! to see maybe 1000 players daily.....
Btw there is at least one player who uses the gothic chess site to practice for compeitions...Ed is the highest rated there.
Originally posted by Fat LadyThose tournament numbers are accurate +/- 20 players. I will no longer allow you to post that I am fabricating these numbers. You are lying, you are now attempting defamy of character, and I must insist that if I see one such post by you regarding this, I will have to commence with legal proceedings.
Number of sales of the chess set is certainly one valid way of measuring the popularity of Gothic Chess. Unfortunately I don't believe your figures and I don't suppose there's any way of verifying them. And no, I don't want to trust your word.
The number of players and games being played online is another way of measuring the popularity of Gothic Chess. ...[text shortened]... rtedly agree that Gothic Chess is the next Big Thing.
But it's not true, is it Ed?
wow, talk about coming down on freedom of speech and public debate............scary! 😛
I mean come on if you put up a picture of yourself and Fischer sitting over tea having a chat then the skepticism would be much less, probably nil. However you do nothing to lessen any skepticism and then threaten legal proceedings when people question what you claim.
Originally posted by Fat LadyCould "FatLady" on here be "Sebastian" from GothicChessLive.com?
The number of players and games being played online is another way of measuring the popularity of Gothic Chess. These aren't too bad, maybe fifteen serious players, another couple of hundred who have tried it once or twice, and a couple of thousand games played in total.
http://www.gothicchesslive.com/one-players-games.php?id=696
If so, looks like he just got whipped twice by Cartaphilus.
...
[cartaphilus]Where are you from?
[sebastian]oxford UK and you
...
http://www.gothicchesslive.com/javascript/game.php?gameid=1922
sebastian - Cartaphilus
0-1
GothicChessLive.com
Fri Nov 03 08:49:59 EST 2006
1.Nh3 d5 2.d4 Nc6 3.Nc3 Nh6 4.i3 g6 5.Be3 Bf5 6.Bi2 e5 7.Bg5 Bf6 8.Bxf6 Axf6 9.dxe5 Cxe5 10.Af3 d4 11.Axe5 Axe5 12.Nb5 Axh2#
http://www.gothicchesslive.com/javascript/game.php?gameid=1923
sebastian - Cartaphilus
0-1
GothicChessLive.com
Fri Nov 03 09:02:47 EST 2006
1.d4 Nh6 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.d5 Ne5 4.f4 Neg4 5.h3 Nf5 6.Qd3 Nge3+ 7.Bxe3 Ng3+ 8.Kf2 Nxh1+ 9.Kf3 e5 10.Nj3 exf4 11.Bxf4 Qf6 12.Rxh1 Ce5+ 13.Kg3 Ch5+ 14.Kh2 Cxf4 15.Ad4 Cxd4 16.Qxd4 Qxd4 17.Cf3 Qj4+ 18.Ki1 g6 19.d6 Be5+ 20.Cxe5 Qf4+ white resigns
Originally posted by EdTriceAre you for real?
Could "FatLady" on here be "Sebastian" from GothicChessLive.com?
http://www.gothicchesslive.com/one-players-games.php?id=696
If so, looks like he just got whipped twice by Cartaphilus.
[b]
...
[cartaphilus]Where are you from?
[sebastian]oxford UK and you
...
http://www.gothicchesslive.com/javascript/game.php?gameid=1922
sebastian - Car ...[text shortened]... h2 Cxf4 15.Ad4 Cxd4 16.Qxd4 Qxd4 17.Cf3 Qj4+ 18.Ki1 g6 19.d6 Be5+ 20.Cxe5 Qf4+ white resigns[/b]
Even if it was Fat Lady who gives a flying ****?
Who won those tournaments for tuition? Any news stories we can link to? Crosstables online, pictures of winners on your website? Pictures of a big tournament room with a couple thousand people in it?
You really wouldn't be having people ask these questions if there was less Supermodels and more tournament stuff on your site. It looks like a good game, but man, the way you promote it is like some mezmerizing train wreck.
By the way, have you thought about piggybacking an event at the National Open or something? Make a decent prizefund and you could be putting pics of GMs playing your game all over your site.
Originally posted by wargamer66The pictures we have have been cropped primarily for the magazine articles. At one point we had to stop showing pictures on the internet because parents did not want pictures of their high school aged children placed online, as "being online" had taken on a negative connotation in subsequent years.
Who won those tournaments for tuition? Any news stories we can link to? Crosstables online, pictures of winners on your website? Pictures of a big tournament room with a couple thousand people in it?
You really wouldn't be having people ask these questions if there was less Supermodels and more tournament stuff on your site. It looks like a good ...[text shortened]... e a decent prizefund and you could be putting pics of GMs playing your game all over your site.
We have motion picture videdo from almost every tournament, including complete walk-arounds of the entire playing halls while games are in progress.
Originally posted by tmetzlerI asked this a couple pages back and Ed replied with a handful of webarchive links to the gothic chess website. I looked at them, and didnt see any links to 3rd party news articles....
Agreed,
Ed, If these really did take place. Can you post the link to at least one 3rd party news article regarding them? I can't believe that such large real in-person tournaments would have taken place completely under the nose of journalists.
So somehow these tournaments with lots of money and lots of players have somehow managed to take place without the independent journalists noticing or caring. 🙁
I agree with the previous poster, if you have had tournaments with hundreds of players and not managed to get one photo with so many people playing gothic chess at once, then you need to hire a better photographer, or just grab a digital camera yourself.
Now you come here threatening lawsuits? And follow it up up by attempting to humiliate FatLady by guessing that he is a new player on your site and posting those losses here??! Way to encourage people to give Gothic Chess a try Ed! That's how you reply to people inquiring honestly about the game and your organization?
And while I am at it, the fact that you managed to get a patent on a simple starting piece arrangement is beyond me. Is that really the only difference between your version and previous chess variants; ie: Capablanca's chess? It sure seems so, wow the patent process really does need a overhaul.
Keep on promoting your version of chess with your ooooh so many active players, dates with supermodels and large sums of prize money, you can keep it.