Go back
Game

Game

Only Chess

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Anyone over 1900+ fancy playing me, I would love as many players as possible to challenge me, looking to make the next step up, improve. Im roughly 1500 myself.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

I would also be grateful of an analysis of my game from a better player ( if im defeated of course ).

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

I never trust a player with a graph looking like a roller coaster.
Why did you resign 120 games? Are you a sand bagger?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Had too many, joined a dangerous clan who dished out games like nightclub party pills.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by hintjul
Had too many, joined a dangerous clan who dished out games like nightclub party pills.
And you did it before but in a lesser extent.
What was that reason?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

You my shrink?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by hintjul
You my shrink?
You need one? Mmm...?

Whoever plays you will gain peanuts if winning, losing lots of points when lose.
Sorry, play someone else.

As I said - I never play anyone with a graph like a roller coaster.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FabianFnas
You need one? Mmm...?

Whoever plays you will gain peanuts if winning, losing lots of points when lose.
Sorry, play someone else.

As I said - I never play anyone with a graph like a roller coaster.
Does it matter? *care*

Play anyone, unless the person is a douche

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Mariska Angela
Does it matter? *care*

Play anyone, unless the person is a douche
You mean matter about rating points?
Some think yes, some think no. I'm with those thinking yes.
Let they who think no play with him. I wouldn't.

I wouldn't - also because I don't like to invest time in anyone that might just give up with no apparent reason.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FabianFnas
You mean matter about rating points?
Some think yes, some think no. I'm with those thinking yes.
Let they who think no play with him. I wouldn't.

I wouldn't - also because I don't like to invest time in anyone that might just give up with no apparent reason.
You should be the better player so it shouldn't matter, if about rating points simply just play unrated, not a big deal either.

And why would someone abandon a game when he wants to learn and get some analysis during game. His loss, not yours 😉

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Mariska Angela
You should be the better player so it shouldn't matter, if about rating points simply just play unrated, not a big deal either.

And why would someone abandon a game when he wants to learn and get some analysis during game. His loss, not yours 😉
Noone knows how good he really is. His skill is not represented by his rating.
Playing unrated is like playing poker with matches instead of money.

If I can avoid playing with a roller coaster, I do. His loss? Or mine? I will never know.

Not a big deal. Anyone wanting to play with him? Go ahead.
Why not you, Mariska?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

AUSTRALIAN, that explains it. just had a peak.

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FabianFnas
Noone knows how good he really is. His skill is not represented by his rating.
Playing unrated is like playing poker with matches instead of money.

If I can avoid playing with a roller coaster, I do. His loss? Or mine? I will never know.

Not a big deal. Anyone wanting to play with him? Go ahead.
Why not you, Mariska?
I would if I haven't had other games to analyse, or the load was a little less from people asking me.

Apart from my own games, and club game analysis I'm giving out. I see no room for this at the moment.

Maybe in the near future, I'll gladly do it.

hintjul, in the mean time, if you have chess related questions send me a pm, or simply just apply to join Club 257 and lay your questions there.
We can help you.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.