The post that was quoted here has been removedPerhaps a point of distinction would be that Plop has almost 100 more wins than you. Admittedly, his opponent's average rating is around 100 elo lower than yours, but he is an active player.
Apparently your only business on this site for the past 70 days has been to use the English language in the most grating way possible by addressing people in third person, constantly abusing quotation marks, and taking every opportunity to give us one of those "great" personal anecdotes like the aforementioned one about how you can't even accept a draw from a GM without inspiring ire in the subject of your discourse.
Perhaps a match between the two of you could settle the matter.
17 Aug 12
Originally posted by Thabtos71 days, 6 hours and 10 minutes Thabots. Come on chum, get your 'pedantic details' (her words) right. 😉
Perhaps a point of distinction would be that Plop has almost 100 more wins than you. Admittedly, his opponent's average rating is around 100 elo lower than yours, but he is an active player.
Apparently your only business on this site for the past 70 days has been to use the English language in the most grating way possible by addressing people in third pe ...[text shortened]... ject of your discourse.
Perhaps a match between the two of you could settle the matter.
Duchess, posturing with your rating difference over mine to confirm your god-like status as a chess player just makes everyone realise what a patzer you are..
Wheel yourself back in to your room, turn off Fritz 10, draw the curtains and go back to your crochet (you were much better at that).
@Thabtos thanks for your comments at least someone else can see my point.
17 Aug 12
Originally posted by ThabtosI wish I could have a go at her OTB at time controls of 40/2, SD/1, d5.
Perhaps a point of distinction would be that Plop has almost 100 more wins than you. Admittedly, his opponent's average rating is around 100 elo lower than yours, but he is an active player.
Apparently your only business on this site for the past 70 days has been to use the English language in the most grating way possible by addressing people in third pe ...[text shortened]... ject of your discourse.
Perhaps a match between the two of you could settle the matter.
- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12477
18 Aug 12
The post that was quoted here has been removedI note with no less disdain that you are still talking about people present in the third person, as if you are a second-year sociology student. If you want to be taken seriously, argue like a human being, not like a debating club member or a back-bench MP.
Richard
