Go back
infinitely permutatable chess? help from math peop

infinitely permutatable chess? help from math peop

Only Chess

h

Joined
14 Oct 01
Moves
20676
Clock
29 Jul 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Gatecrasher
It would be finite. It would be very, very large. It would tend to inifinity. But its rather like asking what the largest prime number is. You feel sure there is an answer, but the capacity to arrive at a defintive answer is way beyond our reach.
couldn't resist...there is no largest prime...this is an old result which has an easy proof from Euler.

yes, this is the wrong forum

W
Angler

River City

Joined
08 Dec 04
Moves
16907
Clock
29 Jul 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by flexmore
there is at least 10 first moves which have 10 different second moves etc for at least 10 moves, so it is greater than 10000000000,
Why choose an arbitrary number? Each player begins with exactly 20 possible first moves. After 1.e3, white has 30 possible second moves, no matter what black does. After, 1.e4, white has 30 possible second moves against everything except 1...e5 (29), 1...f5 (31), and 1...d5 (31).

20 x 20 = 400 possible positions after one move.

There are eight possible sequences of moves leading to white losing by Fool's Mate: 2...Qh4# There are approximately 290 possible sequences of moves leading to black losing to the same tactic: 3.Qh5#

Calculating all the possibilities is terribly difficult, as you note. As far as I know, François Labelle, who programs computers to perform some of these calculations, has only estimated the upper limit. He told me in an email a couple of years ago that he considers the oft quoted 10^120 a conservative estimate, based on the limits of games forty moves long, and no position repeated more than three times (draw claim).

The figure of 10^134 for games up to 50 moves from http://www.geocities.com/explorer127pl/szachy.html appears credible.

D
Losing the Thread

Quarantined World

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
87415
Clock
29 Jul 05
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by chasparos
[Edit: sorry disregard this post. didn't think about the 'all pieces are different' part]
It still does not adress promotions... You won't find any positions on there with three white knights... So this is not a way to find an upper ...[text shortened]... So it's not so easy to find the upper bound on chess positions.
Yes, my estimate is a most upper bound if there can be such a thing.

The two kings position is relatively easy:
Place the white king on a square. If it is a corner square then there are 4 squares unavailable for the black king - the one the first king is on and the three neighbouring ones so that is 4*60 positions - although the board is rotationally symmetric I'm assuming that one end is white's end and one is black's so these count as distinct positions. Next place the first king on the edge of the board, but not in a corner, which cuts off 6 squares, so 58 are available for the black king and there are 6*4 = 24 edge squares. So we have 6*4*58 = 1392 positions. Now put the white king on one of the interior squares, that cuts off 9 squares for the black king, so that gives (64-9)*(64-28) = 1980 positions. This covers all the possibilities so just with two kings and we have:

4*60 + 6*4*58 + (64 - 9) * (64-28) = 240 + 1392 + 55 * 36 = 3612 positions with just 2 kings.

D
Losing the Thread

Quarantined World

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
87415
Clock
29 Jul 05
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

I've realised I can do better, in positions with 2 kings and a piece, but not a pawn - that case is complicated, you need to multiply by 62 to get the number of places the piece can go. If it is a bishop then you don't need to worry about which coloured square it is on and get the right number of positions for a bishop on either square, if you want the number of positions with say a black squared bishop then by symmetry it's half so multiply by 31. This gives:

2 kings + knight, rook or bishop of either colour: 223944
King vs K + bishop: 111972

Other cases are too complicated to work out without being paid.

f
Quack Quack Quack !

Chesstralia

Joined
18 Aug 03
Moves
54533
Clock
30 Jul 05
3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Wulebgr
Why choose an arbitrary number? Each player begins with exactly 20 possible first moves. After 1.e3, white has 30 possible second moves, no matter what black does. After, 1.e4, white has 30 possible second moves against everything except 1. ...[text shortened]... p://www.geocities.com/explorer127pl/szachy.html appears credible.
it6 is not an arbitrary number.

the idea was NOT to find a vague estimate.

the idea was to find a very simple lower bound ... a number smaller than the reality.

when we know an upper bound and a lower bound, then we know the truth lies somewhere in the middle.

refining the upperbound downwards and the lowerbound upwards gives increased accuracy.

the method you suggest tells us very little extra ... using 20 instead of 10 for the first two moves, only multiplies the result by 4, there are many methods to increase it by 100s of 1000s of 1000000s.

f
Quack Quack Quack !

Chesstralia

Joined
18 Aug 03
Moves
54533
Clock
30 Jul 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by DeepThought
Yes, my estimate is a most upper bound if there can be such a thing.

The two kings position is relatively easy:
Place the white king on a square. If it is a corner square then there are 4 squares unavailable for the black king - the one the first king is on and the three neighbouring ones so that is 4*60 positions - although the board is rotationall ...[text shortened]... 4*60 + 6*4*58 + (64 - 9) * (64-28) = 240 + 1392 + 55 * 36 = 3612 positions with just 2 kings.
your estimate is simply an upperbound ...

it is a nice upper bound - probably not that many orders of magnitude to high.

JH

Joined
22 Apr 04
Moves
12367
Clock
30 Jul 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

According to "Bobby Fischer goes to War," by Edmonds and Eidinow, "...it is estimated that there are approximately 25x10 to the 117th power ways for a game to go."

B
Non-Subscriber

RHP IQ

Joined
17 Mar 05
Moves
1345
Clock
31 Jul 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by James Horton
According to "Bobby Fischer goes to War," by Edmonds and Eidinow, "...it is estimated that there are approximately 25x10 to the 117th power ways for a game to go."
What sort of game?

JH

Joined
22 Apr 04
Moves
12367
Clock
01 Aug 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bowmann
What sort of game?
I may be going out on a limb on this, but I'm going to guess it would be a game of chess.

😉

B
Non-Subscriber

RHP IQ

Joined
17 Mar 05
Moves
1345
Clock
01 Aug 05
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by James Horton
I may be going out on a limb on this, but I'm going to guess it would be a game of chess.

😉
Then I would have to say that your previous estimate is way off the mark.

JH

Joined
22 Apr 04
Moves
12367
Clock
02 Aug 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bowmann
Then I would have to say that your previous estimate is way off the mark.
It may be way off the mark indeed. The same book gives an estimate for the number of atoms in the universe--10 to the 80th power, which means of course that the number of possible variations in a game of chess is WAY MORE than the number of atoms in the universe. But I'd like to know how a person would come up with an estimate of the number of atoms in the universe in the first place. Even if you did, would you be able to say it with a straight face?

In any case, I have dedicated the remaining waking moments of my life to memorizing EVERY ONE of those 25x10 to the 116th power chess game variations. Then I'll take on Hydra.

B
Non-Subscriber

RHP IQ

Joined
17 Mar 05
Moves
1345
Clock
02 Aug 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by James Horton, no doubt during a moment of madness
In any case, I have dedicated the remaining waking moments of my life to memorizing EVERY ONE of those 25x10 to the 116th power chess game variations. Then I'll take on Hydra.
You'd still have to cross your fingers and hope that the game doesn't get past move 40.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.