Originally posted by RagnorakI've looked at this quite a bit, and agree with Ragnorak.
No, I meant kingside. I had been thinking about castling queenside earlier. kingside looks a whole lot more secure now, especially after seeing what IM did to SirLoseAlot's queenside castle.
e6 seems to be the move to play here alright.
The moves you listed are slightly off. Should be... 11 ...e6 12 Bf4 Bd6 13 Bxd6 Qxd6 14 [b]Ne4
That's pr ...[text shortened]... the fight to him a little with Qb4? I'd prefer to have Ngf6 played first, but hey?
D
[/b]
Mostly...kingside castle, e6 seems to be the move to play, and why not take the fight to him.
11 ...e6 12 Bf4 Bd6 ??? 13 Bxd6 Qxd6
If we're not castling queenside why worry about a blocking bishop? We don't improve our position by trading bishops, do we?
How about 12...Qb6 (attacking). Depending on his next move the bishop might be useful to check him or threaten his rook.
This may shock a few ppl, but look at the board in a HUMAN SENSE and STRATEGICLY, if say, we castle queenside immediately, then public enemy number 1 can simply queenside pawn storm attack anyways, despite his advancing kingside. This may shock a few ppl, as this will leave public enemy number 1's king in the center, but does black have a way to attack that king in the center? Nope, it's one of those strange dynamics in chess, we cannot attack his king immediately in the center right now and no matter where we castle, he can attack us sooner/quickly and we have to meet that threat and go passive/defensive. So, best to wait until he castles first, then we can see what his whole plan is then, and attapt. We already know he can only castle queenside right now, if he does castle at all, let's keep both castling options open to keep him guessing (we have a phych advantage here) and just develop and maybe eye his centered king a bit. e6 is good, so is Nf6. Castling queenside immediately ruins the cat and mouse/poker game we have set up to our advantage, and plans become crystal clear and the game, while exciting, becomes an attacking race which I think we might lose, subtlety, that's how you win with black, keep public enemy number 1 guessing.
Originally posted by ExiledWelcome back from the dead mate. Are u going to behave yourself this time, or are u going to lose it again?
This may shock a few ppl, but look at the board in a HUMAN SENSE and STRATEGICLY, if say, we castle queenside immediately, then public enemy number 1 can simply queenside pawn storm attack anyways, despite his advancing kingside. This may shock a few ppl, as this will leave public enemy number 1's king in the center, but does black have a way to attack that ...[text shortened]... nk we might lose, subtlety, that's how you win with black, keep public enemy number 1 guessing.
D
I'm going to put this to the vote.
Vote here...
http://www.timeforchess.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=19961&page=%201
xs:
'11 ...e6 12 Bf4 Bd6 ??? 13 Bxd6 Qxd6
If we're not castling queenside why worry about a blocking bishop? We don't improve our position by trading bishops, do we?
How about 12...Qb6 (attacking). Depending on his next move the bishop might be useful to check him or threaten his rook. '
The reason why I had the attacking move after the bishop exchange was because Qb4 seems to be a more dangerous move (double attack: check plus b2) than Qb6. Also, as somebody pointed out to me earlier in the thread, the bishop doesn't block the queenside castle anyway.
Also to xs, I can't quite make out the moves you've written in your next post.
flexmore:
'Nd7f6 does seem to limit the rook, before or after e6. '
I really don't like Nd7f6 before e6, and I don't see how it could be played after e6. Anyway, seeing as it was put forward, I'll add it to the list of candidate moves, which is...
11 ...e6
11 ...Ngf6
11 ...Ndf6
D
Game 868388
IM has played Bf4 as expected.
We've a couple of options.
1) 12 ...Bd6 13 Bxd6 Qxd6 14 Ne4
2) 12 ...Qh5, to try to get the bishop back on d2.
Any thoughts?
D
Originally posted by RagnorakHow exactrly is 12...Qh5 possible, or perhaps you mean the suggested by xs line 12...Qb6!? which looks somewhat appealing. Or is it 12...Qa5+ that seems a bit of waste of time after 13.Bd2 or 13.c3!?; 13.O-O-O is in any case the move to expect should the queen move from c7.
Game 868388
IM has played Bf4 as expected.
We've a couple of options.
1) 12 ...Bd6 13 Bxd6 Qxd6 14 Ne4
2) 12 ...Qh5, to try to get the bishop back on d2.
Any thoughts?
D
EDITED: Spelling 🙁
Originally posted by RagnorakI think you meant "2) ...Qa5+" by that?
Game 868388
IM has played Bf4 as expected.
We've a couple of options.
1) 12 ...Bd6 13 Bxd6 Qxd6 14 Ne4
2) 12 ...Qh5, to try to get the bishop back on d2.
Any thoughts?
D
In my opinion 12 ...Qb6 is best here, since the bishop cant threathen the black queen there, and he will have to protect b2 (probably with 13. b3 on which Le7 will follow).
Originally posted by schakuhrI did indeed mean 12 ...Qa5+, sorry for the misunderstanding.
I think you meant "2) ...Qa5+" by that?
In my opinion 12 ...Qb6 is best here, since the bishop cant threathen the black queen there, and he will have to protect b2 (probably with 13. b3 on which Le7 will follow).
I just don't like having white bishop on f4, and feel that if we play 12 ...Qa5+, then he'll probably play 13. Bd2 Qc7 14. O-O-O
I don't really rate 12 ...Qb6 too highly. He is looking to castle queenside as it is, and we aid him by playing 12 ...Qb6, whereby he'll play 13. O-O-O. And we're still waaaayy behind in development.
Along a similar line to 12 ...Qb6 is the one I mentioned firstly. ie: 12 ...Bd6 13 Bxd6 Qxd6 14 Ne4 Qb4. Qb4 is a better move than Qb6 IMO, because its attacking 2 pieces at once, and will give IM more difficulties. It'll also relieve some of the pressure of his attack as he will maybe play 15. Nc3, thus giving us a little time to develop our last knight. Another possible move for him there is 15. Qc3 for the queen exchange, which I think would suit us quite well at this stage, looking at the horrific difference between wins for white and black at this point. A draw looks like being a good result.
I defo think we should try to get IM off his front foot pretty soon, judging by the clinical end of his two games against SirLoseAlot. Game 761974 and Game 783257
D