@petewxyz said
@DeepThought
Thanks for that
[hidden][/hidden]
@greenpawn34 saidIt's definitely within your powers of solving. Between the Ke1, Ra1, and that pawn on c5, there are lots of clues.
When I saw the Ke1 and Ra1.
[fen]8/8/8/2P3R1/5B2/2rP1p2/p1P1PP2/RnQ1K2k[/fen]
I knew 0-0-0 mate must be in there somewhere. Never got around to solving it.
@petewxyz saidThere's other possibilities, but
@DeepThought
Thanks for that
[hidden] Move the Queen so it is taken by the Knight is only route to castling, but I haven't figured out why the Knight would be compelled to take the Queen?? [/hidden]
@eladar saidIt doesn't. Edit: except as a helpmate.
1Qd2 Rxc2
How does that result in a 2 move checkmate?
@eladar saidThere's my solution to the problem which gives mate in two against any possible move by black, my first post in this thread. There's also my comment on petewxyz's idea, where there's mate in 4 from the original position if one plays his move. It's not clear which of these you're talking about.
@DeepThought
Was your first move on your 2 move checkmate Qd2?
@deepthought saidYour original.solution.
There's my solution to the problem which gives mate in two against any possible move by black, my first post in this thread. There's also my comment on petewxyz's idea, where there's mate in 4 from the original position if one plays his move. It's not clear which of these you're talking about.
1.Qb2 f3xe2 2.Qb7
@eladar saidI removed the above post due to confusion. You asked about moves involving Qd2, but that's not possible after the first move in my original answer.
Your original.solution.
1.Qb2 f3xe2 2.Qb7
The king on e1 and rook on a1 immediately leads you on the (correct) path of O-O-O#. It would be much sneakier if that turned out to be a red herring.
For a while I wondered whether it was legal to castle queenside if your opponent has a piece (bishop or knight) on QN1.
Edit: Sorry, I see now that this was one of the puzzles to be solved in a problem solving competition rather than an entry in a puzzle composition competition.
@deepthought saidI get it now
There's my solution to the problem which gives mate in two against any possible move by black, my first post in this thread. There's also my comment on petewxyz's idea, where there's mate in 4 from the original position if one plays his move. It's not clear which of these you're talking about.
@petewxyz
No need for hidden now I think.
Forcing as in keeping in check, yes you are correct. Black is put into zugzwang, which is a form of forcing.
Here is a classic example where a game ends poorly for the color who must move. The poor move is forced by the only moves possible.