13 Dec 08
Originally posted by RECUVICYou're likely to have a result much higher than the norm as your rating inevitably leads to playing more cheaters.
492 games completed at rhp and a quick count reveals 11 usernames banned for various reasons. It appears that simply numbers of games played is not relevant to the number of banned players one is likely to encounter,rather that random chance plays a bigger part? Only four of the 11 usernames are confirmed as [section 3b]blackbuck-stephane-mary anne ,and wals ...[text shortened]... al games played and ,if this is typical of other players,it would appear to be not unreasonable?
13 Dec 08
😀-As I request only that online challengers should have reached a minimum of 1500 rating and always offer rated or unrated games for them to choose from,like many other players I know nothing of the challengers who accept my challenge offers in open invites,which I think is the fairest way to offer a game challenge.However as a consequence of offering open invite games there is the obvious increased risk of playing against a player who is subsequently removed from play. This is no doubt a risk run by many other players but I remain satisfied that my personal total number of removed players remains within reasonable numbers.--------------
