Go back
Public cheating accusations don't reflect well on RHP

Public cheating accusations don't reflect well on RHP

Only Chess

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
04 Jan 10

Originally posted by Gatecrasher
I've done more game modding on this site than anyone.

There are few things more frustrating than the inaction of the owners of this site when the evidence of cheating against a player is clear, unambiguous and overwhelming.

Yes, on the one hand, the owners can exercise their prerogative, and stay their hand, to do "what is best" for their busines ...[text shortened]... ively ignored?

An urgent, self-inflicted kick up the backside is needed, Russ and Chris.
This post deserves to be rec'd by every person on the site concerned about the amount of cheating on RHP.

pp

Joined
30 May 09
Moves
0
Clock
04 Jan 10
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
criticizing is contributing. in my opinion, even mentioning a forum poster's subscription status is meaningless. hang around in this chess only forum and you'll see most people who keep this place alive are non-subs.

h

Joined
25 Apr 06
Moves
5939
Clock
04 Jan 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by philidor position
criticizing is contributing.
You got that from me 😛

pp

Joined
30 May 09
Moves
0
Clock
04 Jan 10
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by heinzkat
You got that from me 😛
uhm, I don't remember actually, but OK, it's all yours 🙂.

Edit: oh now I remember it! You got me 🙂

P
Mystic Meg

tinyurl.com/3sbbwd4

Joined
27 Mar 03
Moves
17242
Clock
05 Jan 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
This post deserves to be rec'd by every person on the site concerned about the amount of cheating on RHP.
Done and done.

d

Joined
05 Jan 04
Moves
45179
Clock
05 Jan 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

$$$$$$$$$$$$

a

THORNINYOURSIDE

Joined
04 Sep 04
Moves
245624
Clock
05 Jan 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
This post deserves to be rec'd by every person on the site concerned about the amount of cheating on RHP.
24 is a start, but will it make any differenece?

a
Frustrate the Bad

Liverpool

Joined
01 Nov 08
Moves
92474
Clock
05 Jan 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

I believe it will make a difference. More than one mod will resign if the obvious first candidate for expulsion is not summarily banned. If that doesn't happen, the site is compromised. No community can survive where the general view of eligibility is opposed by the hierarchy

S

Joined
14 Jul 06
Moves
20541
Clock
05 Jan 10
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by atticus2
I believe it will make a difference. More than one mod will resign if the obvious first candidate for expulsion is not summarily banned. If that doesn't happen, the site is compromised. No community can survive where the general view of eligibility is opposed by the hierarchy
I think you'll find that game moderation here was severely compromised about 5 years ago when the player in question escaped a ban because of a less than noble decision by Admin.

FL

Joined
21 Feb 06
Moves
6830
Clock
05 Jan 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Squelchbelch
I think you'll find that game moderation here was severely compromised about 5 years ago when the player in question escaped a ban because of a less than noble decision by Admin.
He'd only just joined the site at that point, surely it took a while before someone ran his games through Fritz?

a
Frustrate the Bad

Liverpool

Joined
01 Nov 08
Moves
92474
Clock
05 Jan 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

OK, I meant the first current candidate - although I grant that could mean several

JS357

Joined
29 Dec 08
Moves
6788
Clock
09 Jan 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Fat Lady
I've lost to two players rated around 1600: Game 2305417 and Game 2517874. I think those are my two worst losses.
Have you looked them up? One's been banned, the other has been as high as 1900.

FL

Joined
21 Feb 06
Moves
6830
Clock
09 Jan 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by JS357
Have you looked them up? One's been banned, the other has been as high as 1900.
Kknegi wasn't banned for cheating - he was banned for stupidity. See http://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=52413&page=4
(Thread 52413, last page)

E

Joined
22 Oct 09
Moves
6289
Clock
09 Jan 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Hey I could swear I almost posted a challenge to DanVM in the forum and it went missing inside a Black Hole ?!

All because of these 3 trouble makers 🙁

FL

Joined
21 Feb 06
Moves
6830
Clock
09 Jan 10
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by E3xod
Hey I could swear I almost posted a challenge to DanVM in the forum and it went missing inside a Black Hole ?!(
Why would you challenge DanVM?

And come to that, what could would any online challenge game achieve? We all know that DanVM is now capable of beating anyone on this site. We differ on how we think that has been achieved.

I seem to remember that you said that you knew DanVM personally and that he's quite the globe trotter - junior chess champ in Namibia, met you in Brazil, speaks Russian, about to play for an Austian/German team, hoping to get an IM norm in Budapest. Perhaps he could meet one of us for a face-to-face game? That would clear up any doubts about the source of his chess talent.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.