Go back
Ranking Ratings

Ranking Ratings

Only Chess

R
The Rams

Joined
04 Sep 06
Moves
13491
Clock
16 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

What d'you think (no bias?) would be the rating ranges for the following categories of skill levels: Elite, accomplished, good, average, inexperienced/bad, terrible.

Example 0-600 terrible etc

VB

Joined
15 Dec 06
Moves
1588
Clock
16 Jan 07
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ramned
What d'you think (no bias?) would be the rating ranges for the following categories of skill levels: Elite, accomplished, good, average, inexperienced/bad, terrible.

Example 0-600 terrible etc
lol

Diet Coke
Forum Vampire

Sidmouth, Uk

Joined
13 Nov 06
Moves
45871
Clock
16 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

1383 Spaz!

R
The Rams

Joined
04 Sep 06
Moves
13491
Clock
16 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Von Bardeleben
lol
😳

g

Kalamazoo, MI

Joined
30 Dec 06
Moves
9215
Clock
16 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

1200 new

Diet Coke
Forum Vampire

Sidmouth, Uk

Joined
13 Nov 06
Moves
45871
Clock
16 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

1500 Spazbait

W
Angler

River City

Joined
08 Dec 04
Moves
16907
Clock
16 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ramned
What d'you think (no bias?) would be the rating ranges for the following categories of skill levels: Elite, accomplished, good, average, inexperienced/bad, terrible.

Example 0-600 terrible etc
below 2000: patzers
above 2000: cheaters

just kidding

The USCF has a system that makes sense. You could adopt it too.

2200+ master
2000-2199 expert
1800-1999 A class
1600-1799 B class
1400-1599 C class
1200-1399 D class
etc.

The Russians have a similar system: master, candidate master, etc.

AP

Joined
05 Oct 06
Moves
2144
Clock
16 Jan 07

2500 Spaz-key?!

Diet Coke
Forum Vampire

Sidmouth, Uk

Joined
13 Nov 06
Moves
45871
Clock
16 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Anthony Paton
2500 Spaz-key?!
😀🙄

g

Joined
22 Aug 06
Moves
359
Clock
22 Jan 07
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ramned
What d'you think (no bias?) would be the rating ranges for the following categories of skill levels: Elite, accomplished, good, average, inexperienced/bad, terrible.

Example 0-600 terrible etc
Elite: 2500+
Accomplished: 2200-2499
Good: 1800-2199
Average: 1400-1799
Inexperienced: 1000-1399
Newbie ( I don't like calling people negative names like "bad" and "terrible"😉: under 1000

Just by opinion.

Very Rusty
Treat Everyone Equal

Halifax, Nova Scotia

Joined
04 Oct 06
Moves
640293
Clock
23 Jan 07
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by gaychessplayer
Elite: 2500+
Accomplished: 2200-2499
Good: 1800-2199
Average: 1400-1799
Inexperienced: 1000-1399
Newbie ( I don't like calling people negative names like "bad" and "terrible"😉: under 1000

Just by opinion.
What would you call under 1000?

Newbie?......What about Novice?

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26758
Clock
23 Jan 07
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Very Rusty
What would you call under 1000?

Newbie?......What about Novice?
"tards"

Just kidding 🙂

M

Joined
12 Mar 03
Moves
44411
Clock
23 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Wulebgr
[b]

The USCF has a system that makes sense. You could adopt it too.

b]
This belongs in the paradox thread, no 😉

K
Chess Warrior

Riga

Joined
05 Jan 05
Moves
24932
Clock
23 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Wulebgr
below 2000: patzers
above 2000: cheaters

just kidding

The USCF has a system that makes sense. You could adopt it too.

2200+ master
2000-2199 expert
1800-1999 A class
1600-1799 B class
1400-1599 C class
1200-1399 D class
etc.

The Russians have a similar system: master, candidate master, etc.
Not only russians, but all post-sovietic states.

W
Angler

River City

Joined
08 Dec 04
Moves
16907
Clock
23 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Mephisto2
This belongs in the paradox thread, no 😉
One almost thinks of satire when the USCF does something well, as if they do it to spite us.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.