Go back
rating category

rating category

Only Chess

w

Joined
21 Nov 14
Moves
805
Clock
19 Jan 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

There was a chess computer competition just held ...winner was Komodo 8. I don't know what hardware it was running under...but, like you say, any of these can beat any human player. Fritz, Rybka, Houdini, Stockade, Komodo...

Has anyone asked Ulf T how he shot to the top of rating list in 8 months after being much lower for 6 years ?

C
Cowboy From Hell

American West

Joined
19 Apr 10
Moves
55013
Clock
19 Jan 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by woadman
There was a chess computer competition just held ...winner was Komodo 8. I don't know what hardware it was running under...but, like you say, any of these can beat any human player. Fritz, Rybka, Houdini, Stockade, Komodo...

Has anyone asked Ulf T how he shot to the top of rating list in 8 months after being much lower for 6 years ?
He finally learned how the hosey thing moved. 😕

thaughbaer
Duckfinder General

223b Baker Street

Joined
25 Apr 06
Moves
33101
Clock
19 Jan 15

Originally posted by ChessPraxis
He finally learned how the hosey thing moved. 😕
Hosey ? You mean he was water cannon ?

Schlecter
The King of Board

Solar System

Joined
09 Feb 13
Moves
32401
Clock
20 Jan 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

So, we can put next to our RHP nickname the Chess Engine that we use to play....

C
Cowboy From Hell

American West

Joined
19 Apr 10
Moves
55013
Clock
20 Jan 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by thaughbaer
Hosey ? You mean he was water cannon ?
Don't be a dick. 😛

deejee

Joined
03 Jun 03
Moves
11390
Clock
20 Jan 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
I think that comp put out about 200 million positions per second, and you can get that out of a tablet now
This is not so! A modern PC perhaps achieves 10% of that number. But the software has definitely become smarter and manages to calculate even further ahead by using smarter algorithms, the "heuristic", as they say.

But the rest of your post and the gist of it still stands of course.

w

Joined
21 Nov 14
Moves
805
Clock
20 Jan 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by deejee
This is not so! A modern PC perhaps achieves 10% of that number. But the software has definitely become smarter and manages to calculate even further ahead by using smarter algorithms, the "heuristic", as they say.

But the rest of your post and the gist of it still stands of course.
Some of the chess programs say they can work in 64 "cores" or multiple processors. Who has a computer like that ? I went to DELL and they dont have anything above 4 cores. My computer is an I7 Intel processor & I have a total of 4 cores. One must be reserved to operate the system, so that leaves 3 cores. Maybe some other company sells hardware with more CPUs..probably cost $10,000 or more !

BigDogg
Secret RHP coder

on the payroll

Joined
26 Nov 04
Moves
155080
Clock
20 Jan 15

Originally posted by woadman
Some of the chess programs say they can work in 64 "cores" or multiple processors. Who has a computer like that ? I went to DELL and they dont have anything above 4 cores. My computer is an I7 Intel processor & I have a total of 4 cores. One must be reserved to operate the system, so that leaves 3 cores. Maybe some other company sells hardware with more CPUs..probably cost $10,000 or more !
Still preparing to challenge those page 1 players, I see. 😀

Tintin1963

Joined
24 Apr 10
Moves
23328
Clock
20 Jan 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

How did Ulf T go straight to the top of the ratings I wonder? Perhaps he'd like to contribute to this thread with an explanation of how his new coach and/or chess training books have led to this unbelievable rise.

Or could it be something else.....?

Shallow Blue

Joined
18 Jan 07
Moves
12477
Clock
20 Jan 15

Originally posted by woadman
I've read a post that claims everyone on page 1 & 2 are computer cheaters.
If you ask me, the person most likely to be a computer cheater is the very person making that claim.

w

Joined
21 Nov 14
Moves
805
Clock
20 Jan 15

Originally posted by Shallow Blue
If you ask me, the person most likely to be a computer cheater is the very person making that claim.
Nobody is asking you chump.

King Tiger

Joined
15 Aug 12
Moves
11620
Clock
20 Jan 15
2 edits

Originally posted by woadman
Nobody is asking you chump.
How about you stop throwing insults around woadman to players who have been here 8 years. I've had many ask me that-I believe you are an adolescent computer user. You going to call me a chump too? I guess since I believe you are a kid I ought to take it easy on you.

Off the subject of woadman.

Per Ulf T, I have actually messaged him twice over the past several months asking him for an 'explanation'. No response. He totally wrecked my friend kingaroo in their games. kingaroo is no patzer being 2300+ on here. Ulf T has played nearly 600 moves to date-that is 30 moves a day. Remarkable stamina.

Shallow Blue

Joined
18 Jan 07
Moves
12477
Clock
20 Jan 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by woadman
Nobody is asking you chump.
I refer the honourable gentleman to point 3(d) of this site's Terms of Service.

w

Joined
21 Nov 14
Moves
805
Clock
20 Jan 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by King Tiger
How about you stop throwing insults around woadman to players who have been here 8 years. I've had many ask me that-I believe you are an adolescent computer user. You going to call me a chump too? I guess since I believe you are a kid I ought to take it easy on you.

Off the subject of woadman.

Per Ulf T, I have actually messaged him twice over the ...[text shortened]... + on here. Ulf T has played nearly 600 moves to date-that is 30 moves a day. Remarkable stamina.
I have also personally messaged Ulf T , with the same result.

s

Joined
05 Nov 08
Moves
13417
Clock
21 Jan 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Tintin1963
How did Ulf T go straight to the top of the ratings I wonder? Perhaps he'd like to contribute to this thread with an explanation of how his new coach and/or chess training books have led to this unbelievable rise.

Or could it be something else.....?
he must have discovered the analysis board

;-)

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.