Go back
The Best Sicilian

The Best Sicilian

Only Chess

!~TONY~!
1...c5!

Your Kingside

Joined
28 Sep 01
Moves
40665
Clock
15 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Just remember that Tal unleashed ferocious attacks in a complete different position, and....in anything. 🙂 Also what do you plan on doing after:

1. e4 c5
2. Nf3 g6
3. d4 Bg7
4. c4!?

You might have already talked about this, and I could have missed it, but this surely seems to be an interesting move at least.

e

Joined
19 Nov 05
Moves
3112
Clock
15 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Qa5 and this line is pretty much over as an attempt to get into the Maroczy bind by force. Malakhov handles it the same way.

!~TONY~!
1...c5!

Your Kingside

Joined
28 Sep 01
Moves
40665
Clock
15 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Ah ok, I have seen that before. So there you have it! 😀

e

Joined
19 Nov 05
Moves
3112
Clock
15 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by !~TONY~!
Ah ok, I have seen that before. So there you have it! 😀
Yup, considering all of these new lines, I would say that I've patched up the last remaining problem in the opening. (The previous problem was in the 8...a5 lines with oversimplification and 9.O-O. This was fixed with excellent results by playing d6 and transposing into a safe but still ferocious (for black that is!) Yugoslav.) I've covered every line in the database and then some. I'm now completely confident in this opening and I think it is objectively very solid. 🙂 In fact, now I think your complaint about it being boring or drawish is also not applicable anymore. The Benoni is anything but drawish. 😉

BTW: Another advantage of 3..Bg7 is that a lot of players play dxc! Giving up a central pawn for a flank pawn is not logical in this case. Afer Qa5 I win it back with interest. Thus, playing Bg7 gives White more chances to go wrong. Also, I noticed that those that do play d5 are not at all familiar with theory. (I only had 2 games though.) I guess most e4 players wouldn't know the Benoni well. All in all, this is fantastic!

e

Joined
19 Nov 05
Moves
3112
Clock
15 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Checkout this masterful Malakhov game: http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1326040

d

Joined
26 May 04
Moves
2221
Clock
15 Jun 06
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

1. e4 c5
2. Nf3 g6
3. d4 Bg7
4. c4!?

by transposition this line was played by Topalov many times, check :

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1282086
Gelfand - Topalov, Monte Carlo 2004, 1-0

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1250228
Kramnik - Topalov, Monte Carlo 2002, 1/2-1/2 and

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1214052
Karpov - Topalov, Monte Carlo 2001, 0-1

e

Joined
19 Nov 05
Moves
3112
Clock
15 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Yes, but I wuld play Qa5 in that variation.

c

Joined
02 Feb 06
Moves
8557
Clock
15 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Hey Tony, you should also check out some Alexei Fedorov games, he is known as both the "dragon master" and top current King's gambit players, he should have plenty of interesting games.

c

Joined
02 Feb 06
Moves
8557
Clock
15 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

+15 =12 -4

That, by the way, is his record on chessgames.com when using the King's Gambit 😉.

!~TONY~!
1...c5!

Your Kingside

Joined
28 Sep 01
Moves
40665
Clock
16 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by cmsMaster
Hey Tony, you should also check out some Alexei Fedorov games, he is known as both the "dragon master" and top current King's gambit players, he should have plenty of interesting games.
I have seen quite a few of his games actually. I am trying to play 1.d4 now, so KG games don't really help. 🙂

c

Joined
02 Feb 06
Moves
8557
Clock
16 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by !~TONY~!
I have seen quite a few of his games actually. I am trying to play 1.d4 now, so KG games don't really help. 🙂
1.d4 is way too slow, I suggest 1.e4 e5 2.f4 😀!

e

Joined
19 Nov 05
Moves
3112
Clock
16 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Considering that you like super sharp positions, why would you play d4?

X
Cancerous Bus Crash

p^2.sin(phi)

Joined
06 Sep 04
Moves
25076
Clock
16 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by exigentsky
Considering that you like super sharp positions, why would you play d4?
Yes of course, because all d4 games are closed and quiet.

!~TONY~!
1...c5!

Your Kingside

Joined
28 Sep 01
Moves
40665
Clock
16 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by exigentsky
Considering that you like super sharp positions, why would you play d4?
That is a huge myth that d4 is a slow opening. What about the wild Botvinnik Semi Slav, or the QGD Exchange Variation with 0-0-0? Or the Shabalov Semi Slav? Or the QGA with 3. e4? Or any KID? 😀

David Tebb

Joined
26 May 02
Moves
72546
Clock
16 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by !~TONY~!
That is a huge myth that d4 is a slow opening. What about the wild Botvinnik Semi Slav, or the QGD Exchange Variation with 0-0-0? Or the Shabalov Semi Slav? Or the QGA with 3. e4? Or any KID? 😀
... Also there's loads of sharp variations in the Modern Benoni, Benko Gambit, Dutch, Gruenfeld, Nimzo-Indian...

Some of the greatest attacking players of all time have been Queen's Pawn players, eg. Alekhine, Tal, Bronstein, Kasparov, Topalov, Shirov, Ivanchuk.

Although they usually also alternate with King's Pawn Openings.

Wihin any opening there are always options to play either solidly or sharply. Just knowing that someone is either a King's Pawn player or a Queen's Pawn player, tells you nothing about their style.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.