16 May 07
Originally posted by jvanhineDoes anyone know who writes those detailed wikipedia articles on openings? They give references at the end; are they paraphrasing, quoting or making stuff up? It'd be funny to see those authors revealed as a 1400 bum like myself.
im not sure, but wikipedia has some great info
Like the tennis racquet salesman in Seinfeld 😉
16 May 07
Originally posted by allosteryAnyone can contribute to Wikipedia. Thus, it can be a 1400 or a 2400 for all we know.
Does anyone know who writes those detailed wikipedia articles on openings? They give references at the end; are they paraphrasing, quoting or making stuff up? It'd be funny to see those authors revealed as a 1400 bum like myself.
Like the tennis racquet salesman in Seinfeld 😉
16 May 07
Originally posted by exigentskyBecause you are committing to a queenside fianchetto BEFORE white plays Nf3. This is actually called the Queen's Fiancheto defense . I prefer the normal continuation as it allows Bb4.
I know a lot of Nimzo players also play the QID after Nf3. Some of them even like the QID more. So, I don't really see the problem with 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 b6 3. Nc3 (Nf3 transposes) Bb7 Although, almost no one plays this, so I'm sure there's some problem.
16 May 07
Originally posted by giantrobotOK, sure, if you want to have the chance to play the Nimzo, this doesn't work. However, if you want to avoid theory and just get a good position, what is wrong with this? It feels suspicious, but I can't put my finger on it.
Because you are committing to a queenside fianchetto BEFORE white plays Nf3. This is actually called the Queen's Fiancheto defense . I prefer the normal continuation as it allows Bb4.
16 May 07
Originally posted by exigentskyIt's playable, for sure, it'd probably just transpose to a hippo or something. Of course, black gives up the center and has virtually no control since he hasn't played e6 or d6.
OK, sure, if you want to have the chance to play the Nimzo, this doesn't work. However, if you want to avoid theory and just get a good position, what is wrong with this? It feels suspicious, but I can't put my finger on it.
16 May 07
Originally posted by cmsMasterCan you elaborate on how Black gives up the center? Why can't he play e6 later?
It's playable, for sure, it'd probably just transpose to a hippo or something. Of course, black gives up the center and has virtually no control since he hasn't played e6 or d6.
- Joined
- 21 Jun 06
- Moves
- 82236
16 May 07
1 edit
Originally posted by exigentsky3...Bb7 looks a bit unflexible as black often put the bishop on a6 in many lines of the QID
I know a lot of Nimzo players also play the QID after Nf3. Some of them even like the QID more. So, I don't really see the problem with 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 b6 3. Nc3 (Nf3 transposes) Bb7 Although, almost no one plays this, so I'm sure there's some problem.
16 May 07
Originally posted by exigentskybecause qid is boring....i stick with the nimzo or bogo indian..almost the same ideas
I know a lot of Nimzo players also play the QID after Nf3. Some of them even like the QID more. So, I don't really see the problem with 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 b6 3. Nc3 (Nf3 transposes) Bb7 Although, almost no one plays this, so I'm sure there's some problem.
16 May 07
Originally posted by bikingvikingI agree.
3...Bb7 looks a bit unflexible as black often put the bishop on a6 in many lines of the QID
The dilema of many openings is that to play them best from an objective point-of-view means maintaining flexibility where possible. i.e. we can best meet our opponent's options if we keep our own options open.
However, from a practical point-of-view, this may involve learning more theory; understanding a wider variety of typical middlegames; etc.
So, it may depend on how you balance playing objectively versus being practical/economic.