Originally posted by RahimKIt works almost exactly the same as Full analysis.
I forget how blunder check worked? Explain again please.
I like full analysis because you can feed in say 10 game go to sleep wake up and they are done.
but instead of wasting my time telling you the difference I will refer you...
http://www.chesscentral.com/lopez/eng_an02.htm
Originally posted by ShinidokiAh Haha! I rememeber why i don't use blundercheck.
It works almost exactly the same as Full analysis.
but instead of wasting my time telling you the difference I will refer you...
http://www.chesscentral.com/lopez/eng_an02.htm
Because there is no words. Don't you miss the
and 1.__ Doesn't get the cat out of the bag.
Hoping against hope. Icing on the cake, etc....
You're missing out buddy 🙂
Originally posted by RahimKOr my new favorite... "Doesn't get the bull off the ice" 😀.
Ah Haha! I rememeber why i don't use blundercheck.
Because there is no words. Don't you miss the
and 1.__ Doesn't get the cat out of the bag.
Hoping against hope. Icing on the cake, etc....
You're missing out buddy 🙂
Originally posted by chessmentorAre you any good?
Hi chessfans,
I started playing chess six years ago and I have just passed the magic barrier of 2000 FIDE rating. I trained chess on a daily basis for the last three years. From my own experiences I am convinced that anyone with a normal intelligence can reach the same level as I have, given the right instructions and coaching. Allthough I did all my ...[text shortened]... ore then one player.
Best regards
Send your mail to chessinstructor@hotmail.com