Go back
4x4

4x4

Posers and Puzzles

k

Sigulda, Latvia

Joined
30 Aug 06
Moves
4048
Clock
11 Jun 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

4! * 4 - 4/.4 = 86

A
The 'edit'or

converging to it

Joined
21 Aug 06
Moves
11479
Clock
11 Jun 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

(!4)*(4/.4) - 4 = 86

C

Joined
31 May 06
Moves
36013
Clock
11 Jun 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Agerg
(!4)^(4 - sqrt(4)) + sqrt(4) = 83
Good enough for me. Allowed. (If only to see what you al make of 87)🙄

k

Sigulda, Latvia

Joined
30 Aug 06
Moves
4048
Clock
11 Jun 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

!4^sqrt(4) + 4 + sqrt(4) = 87

k

Sigulda, Latvia

Joined
30 Aug 06
Moves
4048
Clock
11 Jun 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

44 * (4/4) = 88

k

Sigulda, Latvia

Joined
30 Aug 06
Moves
4048
Clock
11 Jun 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

arccos(4 - 4) - 4/4 = 89

A
The 'edit'or

converging to it

Joined
21 Aug 06
Moves
11479
Clock
11 Jun 07
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

hmm...I think perhaps using !n is cheaper than inverse trig operations because for example I can find 1 via : !(!(sqrt(!4)))...I'm betting with a bit of creativity one could find many integers with just one 4 and a combination of sqrt(n), n!, and !n 😵

k

Sigulda, Latvia

Joined
30 Aug 06
Moves
4048
Clock
11 Jun 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

4 * 4! - 4 - sqrt(4) = 90

k

Sigulda, Latvia

Joined
30 Aug 06
Moves
4048
Clock
11 Jun 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Agerg
hmm...I think perhaps using !n is cheaper than inverse trig operations because for example I can find 1 via : !(!(sqrt(!4)))...I'm betting with a bit of creativity one could find many integers with just one 4 😵
But the thing is to use exactly four 4's. I think it's good enough. But if others think so, we can continue without it.

k

Sigulda, Latvia

Joined
30 Aug 06
Moves
4048
Clock
11 Jun 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

arccos(4 - 4) + 4/4 = 91

k

Sigulda, Latvia

Joined
30 Aug 06
Moves
4048
Clock
11 Jun 07
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

!4 * 4 * .4 + sqrt(2) = 92

A
The 'edit'or

converging to it

Joined
21 Aug 06
Moves
11479
Clock
11 Jun 07
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

But the thing is to use exactly four 4's. I think it's good enough. But if others think so, we can continue without it.

true...but finding a three now costs only one 4 where as before it would cost you 3 of em 🙂

C

Joined
31 May 06
Moves
36013
Clock
11 Jun 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kbaumen
But the thing is to use exactly four 4's. I think it's good enough. But if others think so, we can continue without it.
There's another thread-killer I came across - PI/PI=1 - makes it all pretty easy!

k

Sigulda, Latvia

Joined
30 Aug 06
Moves
4048
Clock
11 Jun 07
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

I figured that you can use also 4'. Derivative from any constant number is 0 so figure it out with less than four 4's and add a number of 4' you need.

For example 4/.4 + 4' + 4' = 10

A
The 'edit'or

converging to it

Joined
21 Aug 06
Moves
11479
Clock
11 Jun 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kbaumen
I figured that you can use also 4'. Derivative from any constant number is 0 so figure it out with three 4's and add 4'.
I figured that you can use also 4'. Derivative from any constant number is 0 so figure it out with three 4's and add 4'. 😵

you can also zero from !(!(!(sqrt(!4))))

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.