end of moon hoax theory?

I knew I would be told that the fake moon landings theory is rubbish.
Still someone faked something. I definatly saw photos with two distinct light scouces and not one(ie.the Sun)
Perhaps these 'hoaxers' just want to dis-inform the public and give them fuel to argue over things such as the moon landings so we wont ask other more important questions. Like did the government fly to Mars? Have they met aliens?etc.

Originally posted by karoly aczel
I knew I would be told that the fake moon landings theory is rubbish.
Still someone faked something. I definatly saw photos with two distinct light scouces and not one(ie.the Sun)
Perhaps these 'hoaxers' just want to dis-inform the public and give them fuel to argue over things such as the moon landings so we wont ask other more important questions. Like did the government fly to Mars? Have they met aliens?etc.

Originally posted by FabianFnas
If you want to believe the hoax is true, none can stop you.

I too have seen the "two light source picture" and didn't see anything strange. Perhaps it's you just wanting to see strange things...?

Originally posted by karoly aczel
There are some strange things going on within the government.
Like I said I dont doubt that people landed on the moon.
Why would these 'hoaxers' have gained credibility anyhow?
I mean if it was rubbish and they actually landed on the moon then why would this hoax have gained any weight at all?

I wont speculate at this stage as to why these stran igger and I suspect the moon hoax stuff is just a red-herring to throw off the public.

Originally posted by joe beyser
There is also a theory going around that the moon landings did in fact take place but they made some fake photos as the real pics didn't turn out well. Somewhere I read that the total number of high quality pics brought back was physically imposible. It was very compelling. That doesn't prove a moon landing didn't take place though.

A person can wade t ...[text shortened]... accepted by the hoax conspiracy crowd because they are nutts, not because NASA took the pics.

Originally posted by karoly aczel
I suspect that the purpose of the fake landings was in the past.
It just becomes a historical anomolie. As the 'news' is written anew everyday ad nauseum any real truth in the news soon gets covered over by days and weeks of crap . Like Michael Jacksons death for example.
Every now and then an interesting story comes through the news but then , if i ...[text shortened]... stuff regarding the moon landing hoax on the internet. I'm just working on intuition here.

I think the Stargate exist in real life and the moon landing hoax theories are planted by the US
government to keep the sceptics from digging deeper into the US military space program. They
probably never expected a TV-series to shoot so close to home and open our eyes. That's why, when
they finally got aware of it, it was suddenly cancelled. Only nine seasons. Nine seasons. That's
nothing. It's real. Believe me.

Originally posted by Jigtie
I think the Stargate exist in real life and the moon landing hoax theories are planted by the US
government to keep the sceptics from digging deeper into the US military space program. They
probably never expected a TV-series to shoot so close to home and open our eyes. That's why, when
they finally got aware of it, it was suddenly cancelled. Only nine seasons. Nine seasons. That's
nothing. It's real. Believe me.

Originally posted by sonhouse
Are you saying your intuition tells you the moon landings were faked?

Originally posted by joe beyser
No you are wrong with that you nutt job wako conspiricy goofey guy you. What happened was they went into outer space and found out that the stars and planets were just a hologram. We live on a sphere that exists by itself. Nothing exists but what we see on the surface. That is if you don't count the fact the earth is hollow and there is another world the ...[text shortened]... ticians and well to do folks could get their trips to Hawaii paid for. Birth certificates too.

Although they intended to land on the moon they didn’t land on the moon because they, through sheer incompetence, got lost and landed on mars instead.
So all those pictures were in fact of mars and not the moon but they quickly improvised a massive cover-up to hide this extremely embarrassing lockup of theirs and made out that it was the moon.
This, of course, means all the rocks they brought back are in fact mars rocks and not moon rocks.

They also saw life on mars but destroyed the film of it because it obviously is just not credible that life could be on the moon so that would have blown their cover-up if they had shown those films.
Ever since then they have been pretending they don’t know whether there is life on mars because how would they explain how they know there is life on mars if they said there was life on mars? -if they said that then they would have to admit they have been there already and explain how come.

(admittedly, this is both even less credible and much less so than the usual moon hoax theory but perhaps it is a bit more interesting? )

Originally posted by karoly aczel
(Once again), my intuition tells me they were real AND staged.

http://www.stuffucanuse.com/fake_moon_landings/moon_landings.htm

Originally posted by sonhouse
You mean you think they exaggerated the importance of the moon landings? Or sensationalized some of it? Not sure what you mean by real AND staged.

Originally posted by Andrew Hamilton
Although they intended to land on the moon they didn’t land on the moon because they, through sheer incompetence, got lost and landed on mars instead.
So all those pictures were in fact of mars and not the moon but they quickly improvised a massive cover-up to hide this extremely embarrassing lockup of theirs and made out that it was the moon.
Thi ...[text shortened]... ble and much less so than the usual moon hoax theory but perhaps it is a bit more interesting? )