27 Jul 09
you know what makes jesus cry?
when you don't watch my links just because you're too lazy to paste and copy it (or worse, because you're a racist non-subscriber hater).
do you really want that?
I KNOW you didn't view my link because it's so awesome that you would be too amazed to continue your idle chatter and you would comment it, praising me for being so clever and finding such nice links.
My links are all awesome, be warned!
If you don't comment my link, i will be forced to tell Daniel58 how upset Jesus is because of you !
27 Jul 09
Originally posted by shorbockAArgh!for christs sake!I looked up your...'link'. I dont usually do that.I dont just go flitting around on the internet looking at every bit of garbage.
you know what makes jesus cry?
when you don't watch my links just because you're too lazy to paste and copy it (or worse, because you're a racist non-subscriber hater).
do you really want that?
I KNOW you didn't view my link because it's so awesome that you would be too amazed to continue your idle chatter and you would comment it, praising me for be ...[text shortened]... n't comment my link, i will be forced to tell Daniel58 how upset Jesus is because of you !
But I made an exception after your heart-felt post.
As for my 'idle chatter' do you not see it leading somewhere?
I suppose all the crop-circles are hoaxes too?
27 Jul 09
Originally posted by joe beyserAh! now we are exploring some possibilities.
One theory is that the real pics didn't turn out well.
So they took crappy cameras to the moon or the technology wasn't that great at the time?
Why would they make fake pics of such an important event?
Maybe the pics didn't turn out at all and they needed to make some up so as not to be embarressed?
27 Jul 09
Originally posted by karoly aczelhow dare you call cuddly knitted aliens "bit of garbage" ?
AArgh!for christs sake!I looked up your...'link'. I dont usually do that.I dont just go flitting around on the internet looking at every bit of garbage.
But I made an exception after your heart-felt post.
As for my 'idle chatter' do you not see it leading somewhere?
I suppose all the crop-circles are hoaxes too?
ðŸ˜
And as for crop circles, even though i believe ET life might exist, i'm convinced they would have better things to do than having fun with cows or drawing silly shapes in fields.
27 Jul 09
1 edit
Originally posted by shorbockoops! sorry. didn't mean to offend your cuddly knitted aliens
how dare you call cuddly knitted aliens "bit of garbage" ?
ðŸ˜
And as for crop circles, even though i believe ET life might exist, i'm convinced they would have better things to do than having fun with cows or drawing silly shapes in fields.
'Silly shapes'? If only they were silly shapes . Then they would be way more easy to explain away.
They come up overnight. Are technically perfect and porportioned.
Must be seen from above to get the full picture.
Ok maybe they are not made by extra-terrestrials from other planets. but they are certainly not made by mortals from this planet.Not all of them anyway.
27 Jul 09
Originally posted by karoly aczelYou seem like a tamed down version of FMF.
AArgh!for christs sake!I looked up your...'link'. I dont usually do that.I dont just go flitting around on the internet looking at every bit of garbage.
But I made an exception after your heart-felt post.
As for my 'idle chatter' do you not see it leading somewhere?
I suppose all the crop-circles are hoaxes too?
27 Jul 09
Originally posted by karoly aczelI guess time will tell on that one. As we get more and more into space with manned vehicles, I suspect the moon hoaxers will die off and that stuff will be relegated to big foot and the loch Ness monster. When we get back to the moon and photograph in real time the approach to the landing sites and see the footprints, the moon hoaxers will have to start up some other conspiracy theory to keep up their ill begotten income.
2 separate statements:
1.astronauts landed on the moon.
2.a staged moon landing was shot for some unknown purpose.
27 Jul 09
1 edit
Originally posted by sonhouseprobably you are right. My point was not really regarding the moon-hoax theory anyway. I was just exploring some ideas based on what I've witnessed. No biggie. My thinking is not set in stone.
I guess time will tell on that one. As we get more and more into space with manned vehicles, I suspect the moon hoaxers will die off and that stuff will be relegated to big foot and the loch Ness monster. When we get back to the moon and photograph in real time the approach to the landing sites and see the footprints, the moon hoaxers will have to start up some other conspiracy theory to keep up their ill begotten income.
BTW I checked out your song. The River,is it?
Very nice. I'm so jealous of you people that can afford such nice acoustic guitars.🙂
(so you going to let the crop-circle comment slide?)
27 Jul 09
1 edit
Originally posted by karoly aczelI don't remember for sure if the cameras were crappy or if radiation ruined the film with that theory. The television camera I don't know about either. If that was faked it would make one wonder about the whole thing. I don't know though if it used film or could broadcast an electronic signal. Sorry I am not quite up to snuff on this theory. So we are still with the main 3 choices.
Ah! now we are exploring some possibilities.
So they took crappy cameras to the moon or the technology wasn't that great at the time?
Why would they make fake pics of such an important event?
Maybe the pics didn't turn out at all and they needed to make some up so as not to be embarressed?
1 The whole thing was faked.
2 just the pics were faked.
3 the moon landing and pics are real
If the pics were faked then 1 and 2 are the choices that are left. It still wouldn't prove the whole thing was fake. As for the pics you question it could be that they are fake by someone other than NASA. This is why there is no proof one way or another.
27 Jul 09
Originally posted by joe beyserThe pics I saw were fake. Very common 'moon-landing' pics shown in many a publication. I wish I could provide a link but thats just not me.
I don't remember for sure if the cameras were crappy or if radiation ruined the film with that theory. The television camera I don't know about either. If that was faked it would make one wonder about the whole thing. I don't know though if it used film or could broadcast an electronic signal. Sorry I am not quite up to snuff on this theory. So we are st ...[text shortened]... they are fake by someone other than NASA. This is why there is no proof one way or another.
Not that providing links is a bad thing, its just not my thing.
The pics I saw had two distinct light scources so unless thay took a lighting guy with them to the moon they were definatlly fake.