25 Nov 09
2 edits
Originally posted by FabianFnasoh dear, what a vain attempt, it is a comparative statement, it is well known that i do not feel that evolution is scientific, how many times have i stated that? therefore if i compare my religion to evolution, its hardly grounds for claiming that its scientific, is it? which is further compounded by the FACT, which you cannot bring yourself to admit, that i categorically and unequivocally stated to Noobster that creationism was a religious belief! Shall i dig out the statement for all to see?
I feel it very embarrassing to show against your better knowledge that you have infact said that"my religion is as much science as evolution"Isn't this your words?
You are very clear that you say that your religion is a science - and yet the posting before this you deny that you have ever said that. On your behalf I'm very embarrassed.
very creationist who really think that the silly creationism is science. Because it's not.
i do not lie for i do not hold evolution to be scientific and therefore by comparison, it cannot be stated that i have equated it with science, you are a slandering mountain goat which has been proven time and time again!
you should be embarrassed for your vile assertions once again are exposed to the litmus test of truth and are found wanting! castles made of sand fall in the sea, eventually!
i dedicate this song to your honour!
&feature=related
25 Nov 09
Originally posted by FabianFnasThe thing your asking for is all around you. The proof that there is a God and what he has created is you and the incredible human body that makes you something so special that the smartest scientist and doctors have only scratched the surface as to how it all works. New descoveries and understandings are made every day on the most complex thing in the known universe, the human brain.
Oh, your religion is scinece, eh?
So you have scientific proofs that that god of yours really do exists, eh?
Perhaps it's time to show these so called proofs of yours?
Because you don't want to be called a liar, do you? Again?
But I seriously doubt enough could ever be written down in some book or some link to something on the internet that would ever convience you of the science of God unless you ever get your mind out of these absurd and factless evolutionary theories.
25 Nov 09
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSo you don't hold evolution to be solid science. Silly little you, how wrong you are. But as you don't know it yourself, I have to tell you that - it is!
oh dear, what a vain attempt, it is a comparative statement, it is well known that i do not feel that evolution is scientific, how many times have i stated that? therefore if i compare my religion to evolution, its hardly grounds for claiming that its scientific, is it? which is further compounded by the FACT, which you cannot bring yourself to admit ...[text shortened]... dedicate this song to your honour!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULsiXVkKINA&feature=related
You take your right to define evolution as you want? Then you don't mind if I take my right to define your little silly religion as bogus, do you? Stories for children? fairy tales for weak minded?
If you don't think evolution is science, why are youthen so eager to discuss evolution in the Science Forum? I don't discuss chess in Spiritual Forum. Why? Because I know for a fact that chess is not a religion. Because I'm not as silly as you are.
If you say that your little silly creational ideas is not science, why not tell everyone to your little silly creational friends who also are eager to frequent Science Forum with religious ideas?
Do you want to learn something bout evolution? Then read something about it. When you know the mere basics and want to know more? Then humbly return and ask and we will enlighten you with hard scientific facts about evolution.
Until then, go find a rock under the Spiritual Forum, and stay there. Silly...
25 Nov 09
Originally posted by galveston75So you really think creation is scientific? Robbie, your silly little creational friend of yours thinks it's not. He thinks reation is nothing but a part of your religion, nothing scientific at all.
The thing your asking for is all around you. The proof that there is a God and what he has created is you and the incredible human body that makes you something so special that the smartest scientist and doctors have only scratched the surface as to how it all works. New descoveries and understandings are made every day on the most complex thing in the k ...[text shortened]... nce of God unless you ever get your mind out of these absurd and factless evolutionary theories.
So why do you like to discuss non-scientific things in a Scienctific Forum? That seems very silly to me.
25 Nov 09
1 edit
Originally posted by FabianFnasyes like discussing non spiritual concepts in the spirituality forum. you have been weighed in the balance and found wanting, the writing is on the wall!
So you really think creation is scientific? Robbie, your silly little creational friend of yours thinks it's not. He thinks reation is nothing but a part of your religion, nothing scientific at all.
So why do you like to discuss non-scientific things in a Scienctific Forum? That seems very silly to me.
25 Nov 09
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAs long as I see you, or any other small silly creationists, in the Science Forum, I wouldn't mind to see some scientific education in the Spiritual Forum. Perhaps you will learn something?
yes like discussing non spiritual concepts in the spirituality forum. you have been weighed in the balance and found wanting, the writing is on the wall!
Is the pope homo? Of course no creationist will learn anything of value...
Now, be a nice little silly boy and find your creational little silly people in Spiritual Forum and discuss your silly small a$$es off.
25 Nov 09
Originally posted by FabianFnasWell it seems fab that everything is silly to you. How silly!!! Lol.
So you really think creation is scientific? Robbie, your silly little creational friend of yours thinks it's not. He thinks reation is nothing but a part of your religion, nothing scientific at all.
So why do you like to discuss non-scientific things in a Scienctific Forum? That seems very silly to me.
25 Nov 09
Originally posted by galveston75Yes, everything creationists are silly. Agree totally.
Well it seems fab that everything is silly to you. How silly!!! Lol.
You see creationism as a science, yet you cannot give any scientific proof that there ever have been such a silly thing as a instant creation.
Your silly little attempt - "there is a god" - is no proof, and you know it. So no proof, no science. Even Robbe agree with me there, creationism is not a science. So you're just farting in the blue.
Go somewhere where religion is appreciated.
25 Nov 09
Originally posted by galveston75I do not agree, and I don't think this is the dominant belief in Protestant churches karoly.
Ok...it just doesn't make sence that if God would go to all the trouble to create life in some simple form and then just back out of the picture and then see what happens with it.
First if you believe in God and of his power and wisdom that's so far beyond ours, why just create something that might or might not survive? It would be no different then a ...[text shortened]... one...1John 5:19.
It is a wise person to research what comes from God and what doesn't.
I can't agree with anyone who tells me "First you ....", then ...as if these are "MUST DO" things. When it comes to belief, I can believe anything or any way I wish. I happen to be a Christian evolutionist who accepts the Genesis account as NOT merely an allegory. {How d'ya like DEM apples?" 🙂 }
God could certainly have created the heavens, earth, oceans, light, etc. and used evolution, the big-bang theory, etc. as means of continuing His creation. That "it doesn't make sense" to one person is incidental.
25 Nov 09
Originally posted by FabianFnasLol, the despot of the science forum has spoken, well oh great hypocritical mountain goat, perhaps you shall learn something of creationism after all, for it seems to be escaping your notice, that while the belief in creationism is spiritual in essence, the basis is an examination of the physical world, which we are at liberty to discuss here in the science forum, that is of course unless you also wish to try to monopolise that as well. therefore i suggest that unless you have anything constructive to say, you should get out of here, back to your mountain, where you have put yourself on high, so that all others appear small and insignificant.
Yes, everything creationists are silly. Agree totally.
You see creationism as a science, yet you cannot give any scientific proof that there ever have been such a silly thing as a instant creation.
Your silly little attempt - "there is a god" - is no proof, and you know it. So no proof, no science. Even Robbe agree with me there, creationism is not a science. So you're just farting in the blue.
Go somewhere where religion is appreciated.
25 Nov 09
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSo what is the evidence for his 'hypocritical' stance? That he does not believe creationism is a science? Nobody believes creationism is a science. Do you? Having a stance like that shows he wants scientific based evidence, not just words from an ancient book or someone saying 'there is a god and he created the heavens and the Earth'. I hope you agree that is not science, I think the word is religion. So how do you see hypocrite in Fab's words? I would like to know.
Lol, the despot of the science forum has spoken, well oh great hypocritical mountain goat, perhaps you shall learn something of creationism after all, for it seems to be escaping your notice, that while the belief in creationism is spiritual in essence, the basis is an examination of the physical world, which we are at liberty to discuss here in the ...[text shortened]... ountain, where you have put yourself on high, so that all others appear small and insignificant.
25 Nov 09
3 edits
Originally posted by sonhousethe evidence for his hypocritical stance is that he comes to the spirituality forum with non spirituality in fact i would term it, anti spirituality, and then is able to pontificate to others what they may or may not discuss in the science forum. I think the word you may be searching for is hypocrisy. Creationism is a religious belief, the basis of which is an examination of the physical world. As creationists are we not also interested in science? are we not also awestruck by the physical world?
So what is the evidence for his 'hypocritical' stance? That he does not believe creationism is a science? Nobody believes creationism is a science. Do you? Having a stance like that shows he wants scientific based evidence, not just words from an ancient book or someone saying 'there is a god and he created the heavens and the Earth'. I hope you agree that ...[text shortened]... ink the word is religion. So how do you see hypocrite in Fab's words? I would like to know.
