Originally posted by twhiteheadI accept the facts that the astronimers are trying to count the stars, but since they can't they have to resort to guessing, just like they guess at how old each of the stars and clusters of stars are. They are too proud to just say they don't know.
Have you ever done so? I bet RJ hasn't. I am pretty sure I haven't seen the distinctive galaxy shape through a telescope myself. Both of us must rely on the astronomers for this information. But the astronomers can't be trusted as some of the most fundamental things they say are clearly outright wrong.
If there really are as many stars as astronomers cla ...[text shortened]... e anywhere near as big as astronomers claim. In fact, they must be smaller than most planets.
Originally posted by RJHindsYou are still not addressing my point that you should not believe anything whatsoever that astronomers tell you, yet you seem to have been taken in by them on a very large scale. You even believe in the existence of galaxies. Your naivete is amazing.
I accept the facts that the astronimers are trying to count the stars, but since they can't they have to resort to guessing, just like they guess at how old each of the stars and clusters of stars are. They are too proud to just say they don't know.
Originally posted by twhiteheadhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=DM5f036pq4U
You are still not addressing my point that you should not believe anything whatsoever that astronomers tell you, yet you seem to have been taken in by them on a very large scale. You even believe in the existence of galaxies. Your naivete is amazing.
Originally posted by twhiteheadNot a Galaxy but no argument from me.....also if the known universe and all it contained were only 6k light years or so across imagine how bright the night sky would be ? but we know otherwise not to mention the gravitational effect it would have on us
Have you ever done so? I bet RJ hasn't. I am pretty sure I haven't seen the distinctive galaxy shape through a telescope myself. Both of us must rely on the astronomers for this information. But the astronomers can't be trusted as some of the most fundamental things they say are clearly outright wrong.
If there really are as many stars as astronomers cla ...[text shortened]... e anywhere near as big as astronomers claim. In fact, they must be smaller than most planets.
Manny
Originally posted by menace71You are guessing like the rest of them numbnuts.
Not a Galaxy but no argument from me.....also if the known universe and all it contained were only 6k light years or so across imagine how bright the night sky would be ? but we know otherwise not to mention the gravitational effect it would have on us
Manny
I think Russel Humphreys is on to something in his young Earth old universe Cosmology. Basically it has to do with relativity and his theory is that the earth was in a white hole (opposite of a black hole) time on earth was 6 days while out in the universe millions of years could of past by. The Universe was not very big maybe 2 LY's across then as the bible said God stretched out the heavens. From our vantage point old universe. Nothing we see really refutes his theory stars and galaxies are redshifted which would have happened if time and space were stretched out. Also this would explain the mature galaxies seen where astronomers did not think they should be seen. The Galaxies would have been created on the same day or in the same week.
Manny