Go back
Let there be light

Let there be light

Science

twhitehead

Cape Town

Joined
14 Apr 05
Moves
52945
Clock
25 Mar 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
I will jump on the LED bandwagon when the price gets to about 10% of what they are now, which is around $50 per bulb.
How does that compare to whatever you are using now (full life time cost), and how much electricity do they save?

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
25 Mar 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
If you aren't going to use them, the most efficient solution is not to buy lamps.
Sure, you'll use them, but not very much. The amount of money you save each year isn't going to be much if you just turn off your lights when not in use.

But hey, perhaps you should have said that right off the bat instead of saying that what I said wasn't true.

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
25 Mar 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
What color temperature rating did you settle on? We have here in the US a franchise of stores called Batteries Plus Lights and they have all sorts of LED's and spiral bulbs, the spirals have as much as 3500 lumens! And they have a color temperature display showing how light of various temperatures effect the colors of things in a room.

What is your favor ...[text shortened]... D bandwagon when the price gets to about 10% of what they are now, which is around $50 per bulb.
I like the 6400 Kelvin - that's right at the cool end - I think it is
closest to natural light - the rest of the house is the halogen
energy savers (spiral type).

GU10 led bulbs are NZ$20 ... a big drop in price.
Same size/output halogens are about NZ$8

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
25 Mar 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Eladar
No, the regular old fashioned light bulbs. When you don't need them, you turn them off and they are as efficient as the more expensive kind at a fraction of the cost.
NO
My new bulbs are 4W and brighter than the old-fashioned 100W

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
25 Mar 14
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Eladar
Sure, you'll use them, but not very much. The amount of money you save each year isn't going to be much if you just turn off your lights when not in use.

But hey, perhaps you should have said that right off the bat instead of saying that what I said wasn't true.
Back of an envelope calculation shows that I'll save about 600kWhours
of electricity in the kitchen per year. At 25c a unit that's $150. They
cost me $180. So my break even is in about a year.

But the quality of light is so much better!
And better for the environment - the led bulbs are easier to recycle.

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
26 Mar 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wolfgang59
Back of an envelope calculation shows that I'll save about 600kWhours
of electricity in the kitchen per year. At 25c a unit that's $150. They
cost me $180. So my break even is in about a year.

But the quality of light is so much better!
And better for the environment - the led bulbs are easier to recycle.
How many watts of light are you using in that kitchen? How many hours do you have your kitchen lights on during an average day?

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
26 Mar 14
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Eladar
How many watts of light are you using in that kitchen? How many hours do you have your kitchen lights on during an average day?
About 3 hours in summer 7 hours in winter

9 bulbs

Now using 36W was using 450W

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
26 Mar 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

My rate is much lower than yours I'm sure. I think I'm paying more like 10 cents per kwh. I use about 300 watts max in my kitchen. I don't live so far north, so I use my kitchen lights for much less time than you.

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
26 Mar 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Eladar
My rate is much lower than yours I'm sure. I think I'm paying more like 10 cents per kwh. I use about 300 watts max in my kitchen. I don't live so far north, so I use my kitchen lights for much less time than you.
10c per kWh is so cheap! No wonder you have less incentive to save energy!

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
26 Mar 14
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wolfgang59
10c per kWh is so cheap! No wonder you have less incentive to save energy!
Isn't it terrible? In the US many common people own cars and use them because our gas is also so cheap. Yep, it is terrible that so many common people get to experience for themselves what only the rich people get to experience in Europe.

In the US you can buy a dollar's worth of light bulbs and still be able to afford to use them.

h

Joined
06 Mar 12
Moves
642
Clock
26 Mar 14
3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Eladar
Isn't it terrible? In the US many common people own cars and use them because our gas is also so cheap. Yep, it is terrible that so many common people get to experience for themselves what only the rich people get to experience in Europe.

In the US you can buy a dollar's worth of light bulbs and still be able to afford to use them.
The implied issue he raised here was not who should be able to afford to experience using large amounts of energy themselves but rather the relatively unrelated issue of the lack of financial incentive to save energy when that energy is made cheap.

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
26 Mar 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Eladar
Isn't it terrible? In the US many common people own cars and use them because our gas is also so cheap. Yep, it is terrible that so many common people get to experience for themselves what only the rich people get to experience in Europe.

In the US you can buy a dollar's worth of light bulbs and still be able to afford to use them.
I've been quoting NZ$ rates and you think I live in Europe?

Better brush up on your geography! 😉

I think our power is expensive because of artificial subsidy that
was given to Aluminium industry. The collapse in Aluminium
prices has cost New Zealander house-holders.

Anyway - from what Sonhouse said, led bulbs are more expensive in US.

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
26 Mar 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wolfgang59
I've been quoting NZ$ rates and you think I live in Europe?

Better brush up on your geography! 😉

I think our power is expensive because of artificial subsidy that
was given to Aluminium industry. The collapse in Aluminium
prices has cost New Zealander house-holders.

Anyway - from what Sonhouse said, led bulbs are more expensive in US.
No problem. Same thing applies.

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
26 Mar 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by humy
The implied issue he raised here was not who should be able to afford to experience using large amounts of energy themselves but rather the relatively unrelated issue of the lack of financial incentive to save energy when that energy is made cheap.
Financial incentive is only for those who need to worry about finances. If you are rich enough, who cares? It is only the poor and average person who has his energy usage decreased by expensive energy.

h

Joined
06 Mar 12
Moves
642
Clock
26 Mar 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Eladar
Financial incentive is only for those who need to worry about finances. If you are rich enough, who cares? It is only the poor and average person who has his energy usage decreased by expensive energy.
Financial incentive is only for those who need to worry about finances.

...which is the majority.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.