A fundamental pillar of physics – that nothing can go faster than the speed of light – appears to be smashed by an oddball subatomic particle that has apparently made a giant end run around Albert Einstein’s theories.
Scientists at the world’s largest physics lab said Thursday they have clocked neutrinos travelling faster than light. That’s something that according to Einstein’s 1905 special theory of relativity – the famous E (equals) mc2 equation – just doesn’t happen.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/technology/science/scientists-in-shock-after-breaking-speed-of-light/article2176328/
This is definitely still in the realms of maybe, possibly,
can someone please tell us what we're doing wrong,
territory.
Also Neutrinos only travel at the speed of light if they are massless.
They are currently thought not to be massless, just extremely light.
However they are being kicked out of a particle accelerator so they
should be moving at something like 99.99999999999% light speed.
If true it works out at something like 7.4km/s over C
((60 * (10^(-9))s) / (730,000m / 299,792,458m/s)) * 299,792,458m/s = 7,387.02887m
or about 0.0025%C
However I wouldn't get excited. It is much more likely to be a systematic error than a result.
If it is a result though it's extremely cool.
However given how many times SR and GR have been tested, the circumstances for which it gets broken have
got to be pretty exotic.
Originally posted by uzlessYour fundamental pillar of atheistic physics is wrong.
A fundamental pillar of physics – that nothing can go faster than the speed of light – appears to be smashed by an oddball subatomic particle that has apparently made a giant end run around Albert Einstein’s theories.
Scientists at the world’s largest physics lab said Thursday they have clocked neutrinos travelling faster than light. That’s something that ...[text shortened]... il.com/news/technology/science/scientists-in-shock-after-breaking-speed-of-light/article2176328/
Vedanta has informed us that the mind is swifter than light.
Thought forms have always been faster.
Originally posted by googlefudgeWouldn't it be 1.0025 c if it is supposed to be going faster that c?
If true it works out at something like 7.4km/s over C
((60 * (10^(-9))s) / (730,000m / 299,792,458m/s)) * 299,792,458m/s = 7,387.02887m
or about 0.0025%C
However I wouldn't get excited. It is much more likely to be a systematic error than a result.
If it is a result though it's extremely cool.
However given how many times SR and GR have been tested, the circumstances for which it gets broken have
got to be pretty exotic.
Like they said though, it is probably some systemic error and in a couple of months there will be a correction paper, oops it was really 0.0025% UNDER c.
This lends some credibility to the holographic universe model - which many scientists dismiss out of hand because of Einstein's theory of relativity.
When an electron is split into, it has been proven that the 2 resulting quanta travel at exact opposite angles (a bee-line in the opposite direction of one another)... no matter how far apart they are. This means that when one quantum bounces off an obstruction, the other one (again no matter how far apart it is) changes direction instantly to continue it's opposite direction angle away from the other quantum. The gist of all this is, quantum physicists such as Bohm (a student of Einsteins) have concluded that since the 2 quanta communicate with each other instantly (faster than light) then the logical deduction is they are part of a whole rather than separate. That whole, being the whole of the universe, a giant hologram where all things are interconnected.
Anyway all this is shot down by Einstein's theory of relativity - and so I am very intrigued by the possibility that the theory of relativity is being challenged.
You folks that are claiming all this doubt even by the researchers themselves need to read the whole article. The researchers themselves checked, double checked, triple checked their data through and through for months before making the announcement. It's not like it's some flim-flam claim by a bunch of hacks making assumptions. The researchers making the claim are just as astounded and perplexed as the rest of the scientific community.
Originally posted by sumydidThis is the actual text:
This lends some credibility to the holographic universe model - which many scientists dismiss out of hand because of Einstein's theory of relativity.
When an electron is split into, it has been proven that the 2 resulting quanta travel at exact opposite angles (a bee-line in the opposite direction of one another)... no matter how far apart they are. This king the claim are just as astounded and perplexed as the rest of the scientific community.
"CERN says a neutrino beam fired from a particle accelerator near Geneva to a lab 454 miles (730 kilometres) away in Italy travelled 60 nanoseconds faster than the speed of light. Scientists calculated the margin of error at just 10 nanoseconds, making the difference statistically significant. But given the enormous implications of the find, they still spent months checking and rechecking their results to make sure there was no flaws in the experiment."
Notice it said 60 nanoseconds FASTER than the speed of light. In other words if there had been a photon sent off at exactly the same time as the neutrino, the neutrino would have beaten the photon by 60 nanoseconds. This article in no way said anything about the neutrino covering the 700 odd Km in 60 nanoseconds.
454 miles times 5280 =2397120 feet and light travels ~= 1 nanosecond per foot so that is about the number of nanoseconds for the total flight.
So they are saying the neutrino covered that distance in 2,397,060 nanoseconds and that is 1.000025 X the speed of light, not 1.0025 like on poster said.
That would put the photon about 60 feet behind the neutrino when it hit the target.
Originally posted by sonhouseSurely that 454 miles is only correct to 3 decimal places? (or less, if you just converted it from kilometres).
454 miles times 5280 =2397120 feet and light travels ~= 1 nanosecond per foot so that is about the number of nanoseconds for the total flight.
So they are saying the neutrino covered that distance in 2,397,060 nanoseconds and that is 1.000025 X the speed of light, not 1.0025 like on poster said.
Originally posted by googlefudgeAre you laughing or crying?
this made me laugh so hard.
I have just smashed your fundamental principle of physics.
Light is energy.
Thought forms are in reality energy.
Thought forms have been going faster than light for eternity.
So your fundamental is not so fundamental.
Dumb science.
Originally posted by DasaYou will now be formally known as 'dunca'.
Are you laughing or crying?
I have just smashed your fundamental principle of physics.
Light is energy.
Thought forms are in reality energy.
Thought forms have been going faster than light for eternity.
So your fundamental is not so fundamental.
Dumb science.