Go back
What causes magnetism?

What causes magnetism?

Science

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26757
Clock
14 Mar 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
Explain it as simply as possible.

If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
-Albert Einstein

h

Joined
06 Mar 12
Moves
642
Clock
14 Mar 20
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
What do electrons have to do with it?
Without them the magnets wouldn't work and for more reason than merely the electrons helping to keep the atoms of the magnet attached to each other.
We will not baby sit you and explain the details of how so when any non-moron can just look them up and read it for themselves.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
14 Mar 20

@Metal-Brain
Jesus you are completely daft. Electrons are the CORE of magnetism. Try making magnets out of either protons or neutrons you fukking idiot.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22643
Clock
14 Mar 20

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
Jesus you are completely daft. Electrons are the CORE of magnetism. Try making magnets out of either protons or neutrons you fukking idiot.
I didn't say they had nothing to do with it you moron. I asked you to be more specific. Do I have to spell everything out for you so you don't assume?

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
14 Mar 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@Metal-Brain
We don't have to since you clearly already know all about it and are just trying to make fools of us.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22643
Clock
18 Mar 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
We don't have to since you clearly already know all about it and are just trying to make fools of us.
All you needed to do was use the Schwarzschild equation. This is yet another digression.

Why are permanent magnets limited to Iron, Cobalt and Nickle? What about their electrons make them suitable for permanent magnets while other metals are not?

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
18 Mar 20
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@Metal-Brain
They have electrons that easily line up to contribute their individual magnetic moments to the whole.
But everything has some small magnetic field, for instance, brain waves can be monitored by magnetic field readings as well as electrodes attached to the skull.

And frogs have been floated in mid-air by a high gauss magnetic field.

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/1997/04/floating-frogs

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22643
Clock
18 Mar 20

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
They have electrons that easily line up to contribute their individual magnetic moments to the whole.
But everything has some small magnetic field, for instance, brain waves can be monitored by magnetic field readings as well as electrodes attached to the skull.

And frogs have been floated in mid-air by a high gauss magnetic field.

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/1997/04/floating-frogs
That doesn't explain the big difference in the magnetic field. Why are Iron, Cobalt and Nickle so strong while others are very weak?

h

Joined
06 Mar 12
Moves
642
Clock
18 Mar 20
13 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
That doesn't explain the big difference in the magnetic field. Why are Iron, Cobalt and Nickle so strong while others are very weak?
Why don't you just say YOUR theory on why?
Of course, the FAR more intelligent and rational thing to do is to just do what I and most of us here do which is NOT come up with your own layperson theory that ignores whatever the science says but RATHER just look up what the science says and assume that to be probably correct by default unless you have a VERY good specific reason to think the contrary, which is EXTREMELY unlikely if you are a non-expert but just moderately unlikely even if you are an expert in the relevant subject.
So why don't you do that here instead?

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22643
Clock
18 Mar 20

@humy said
Why don't you just say YOUR theory on why?
Of course, the FAR more intelligent and rational thing to do is to just do what I and most of us here do which is NOT come up with your own layperson theory that ignores whatever the science says but RATHER just look up what the science says and assume that to be probably correct by default unless you have a VERY good specific reason t ...[text shortened]... unlikely even if you are an expert in the relevant subject.
So why don't you do that here instead?
What does the science say? You have not even explained that.

Why Iron, Cobalt and Nickle? What makes them magnetically strong enough to create permanent magnets?

h

Joined
06 Mar 12
Moves
642
Clock
18 Mar 20
2 edits

@metal-brain said
What does the science say? You have not even explained that.
Why not just look it up yourself?
We won't babysit you.
Why ask me?

D
Losing the Thread

Quarantined World

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
87415
Clock
18 Mar 20

@metal-brain said
That doesn't explain the big difference in the magnetic field. Why are Iron, Cobalt and Nickle so strong while others are very weak?
It's not so much that they are strong, it's that they are ferromagnetic and retain their magnetism. Other materials which are magnetizable but lose their magnetization when an external field is removed are called paramagnetic. However, most materials will actively oppose an external magnetic field, they are called diamagnetic.

I don't understand ferromagnetism particularly well, it's not my field, somehow the lowest energy state is the one where the valence electrons of neighbouring atoms have spins which are aligned. It's something to do with them being transition metals.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22643
Clock
18 Mar 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@deepthought said
It's not so much that they are strong, it's that they are ferromagnetic and retain their magnetism. Other materials which are magnetizable but lose their magnetization when an external field is removed are called paramagnetic. However, most materials will actively oppose an external magnetic field, they are called diamagnetic.

I don't understand ferromagnetism partic ...[text shortened]... bouring atoms have spins which are aligned. It's something to do with them being transition metals.
From the link below:

"There is ample evidence that some atoms or ions have a permanent magnetic moment that may be pictured as a dipole consisting of a positive, or north, pole separated from a negative, or south, pole."

https://www.britannica.com/science/ferromagnetism

If a magnetic moment is permanent why is it still called a moment?

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26757
Clock
19 Mar 20
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
From the link below:

"There is ample evidence that some atoms or ions have a permanent magnetic moment that may be pictured as a dipole consisting of a positive, or north, pole separated from a negative, or south, pole."

https://www.britannica.com/science/ferromagnetism

If a magnetic moment is permanent why is it still called a moment?
Try taking Physics 101

D
Losing the Thread

Quarantined World

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
87415
Clock
19 Mar 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
From the link below:

"There is ample evidence that some atoms or ions have a permanent magnetic moment that may be pictured as a dipole consisting of a positive, or north, pole separated from a negative, or south, pole."

https://www.britannica.com/science/ferromagnetism

If a magnetic moment is permanent why is it still called a moment?
The word has three meanings. The first is a moment in time. The second is importance, something of great moment is something of great importance. The meaning in physics is derived from the second sense of moment.

https://www.lexico.com/definition/moment

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.