@kellyjay saidMulti-headed paganistic nonsense.
I wish you'd stop misrepresenting what is said to you, three people one being. Not three people one person.
God is one but God is three
The three are co-equal but the father is greater than the son
The father is a spirit but The spirit of Christ is referenced as being in old and New Testament
And lets nor forget the third person, the Holy Spirit
So that’s three distinct spirits
@ghost-of-a-duke said"Let us make man in our image..." the Spirit of God, the Son of God, if not God, then why call them the Spirit of God and God's Son in scripture? That Genesis quote, among other such texts, points to the trinity, not three different Gods, there is but One. God is One; there is nothing about Him in a conflict in His nature at all at any point in any time. No shadow of turning would be impossible for us as we are constantly changing, altering our views, positions, looking at things differently, not so God, and not so God in the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. They are in a perfect loving relationship with each other and have been for eternity; God is not improving. God does nothing that alters God's nature that God isn't God anymore by becoming less than He is. God is not created. He is the prime reality; everything is due to Him and is maintained by Him.
Go have a quiet read of the baptism of Jesus where we have the 3 main protagonists (the son, Father and Holy Spirit) interacting with each other as clearly separate entities and then (with your own reasoning) calibrate that with the Trinity.
@divegeester saidGod is One, settle on that and your good. God the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are One, settle on that. Three distinct persons, one God.
Multi-headed paganistic nonsense.
God is one but God is three
The three are co-equal but the father is greater than the son
The father is a spirit but The spirit of Christ is referenced as being in old and New Testament
And let nor forget the their person the Holy Spirit
So that’s three distinct spirits
@divegeester saidThis "faith speak" phrasing is how you plan on refuting things said you by simply characterizing them as somehow less than without addressing the points directly as you seem to do with quite a regularity, attempting to turn this into a personality discussion versus the topic at hand?
Here come the blocks of faith speak.
@kellyjay saidSaying god is one person and then saying god is three persons and then denying those persons are different people is risible nonsense.
God is One, settle on that and your good. God the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are One, settle on that. Three distinct persons, one God.
It’s incomprehensible pagan crap like this and eternal torture which is these days keeping people out of the kingdom.
@kellyjay saidNo, “blocks of faith speak” is a phrase invented recently by FMF to describe your waffly fur-balls of text which are nothing more than you smoothing of the edges of a sharply erroneous dogma with a bunch of word-strings you might hear from an evangelical pastor who has been asked a tough question by a newcomer to the church. Your third post down on this page is a class example.
This "faith speak" phrasing is how you plan on refuting things said you by simply characterizing them as somehow less than without addressing the points directly as you seem to do with quite a regularity, attempting to turn this into a personality discussion versus the topic at hand?
It just doesn’t wash in here.
@divegeester saidNo one denies they are not three different people; for crying out loud, do you read the things said to you before you react?
Saying god is one person and then saying god is three persons and then denying those persons are different people is risible nonsense.
It’s incomprehensible pagan crap like this and eternal torture which is these days keeping people out of the kingdom.
@divegeester saidSo it is just a way to degrade without addressing the specifics, glad that was cleared up early.
No, “blocks of faith speak” is a phrase invented recently by FMF to describe your waffly fur-balls of text which are nothing more than you smoothing of the edges of a sharply erroneous dogma with a bunch of word-strings you might hear from an evangelical pastor who has been asked a tough question by a newcomer to the church. Your third post down on this page is a class example.
It just doesn’t wash in here.
13 Jan 22
@kellyjay saidOk so let’s get this straight
No one denies they are not three different people; for crying out loud, do you read the things said to you before you react?
They ARE three different people…but they are the same person?
Or they are three different people on a board of governance?
Jesus is one person but the father is greater than him, so they are not do-equal?
Try to explain it without a load of faith speak.
13 Jan 22
@divegeester saidNO AGAIN, stop changing the words to fit what you think is being said and read what is said. Three different people, one being, One God, God is One. Who besides you is saying co-equal, they are equal in that they are God, they are not equal in governance the Father is greater.
Ok so let’s get this straight
They ARE three different people…but they are the same person?
Or they are three different people on a board of governance?
Jesus is one person but the father is greater than him, so they are not do-equal?
Try to explain it without a load of faith speak.