Spirituality
03 May 12
15 May 12
Originally posted by KellyJaySo answer the questions. Are you anti-astrology, or do you simply reject it? Are you open about astrology? Do you think astrology is harmful to its adherents and others around them?
Being anti is not the same as being open about it or even rejecting some of the
beliefs about certain things....being anti is being against which is different than
rejecting.
Kelly
15 May 12
Originally posted by RJHindsstill nothing. my argument still stands. man, this is really easy, you guys have absolutely no arguments, just empty talk.
He said you had nothing to counter. That means your argument does not mount to a hill of beans. It is nothing. Can't you understand plain English?
15 May 12
1 edit
Originally posted by VoidSpiritI don't even know if you have an argument to still stand. I don't know what argument you are referring to. I was just trying to explain to you what jaywill was saying. He says you have nothing. That at least means you have no real proof for whatever your argument happens to be. You did not seem to understand that point of his. Is it clear, now?
still nothing. my argument still stands. man, this is really easy, you guys have absolutely no arguments, just empty talk.
16 May 12
Originally posted by RJHindsit's clear that you have no counter arguments to make. your empty rhetoric continues and my argument stand.
I don't even know if you have an argument to still stand. I don't know what argument you are referring to. I was just trying to explain to you what jaywill was saying. He says you have nothing. That at least means you have no real proof for whatever your argument happens to be. You did not seem to understand that point of his. Is it clear, now?
16 May 12
Originally posted by twhiteheadI'm apathetic about it, yes its harmful to its adherents as a lot of things are to a
So answer the questions. Are you anti-astrology, or do you simply reject it? Are you open about astrology? Do you think astrology is harmful to its adherents and others around them?
lot of people that lead them away from Jesus Christ, but its way down on the
importance ladder as far as I'm concern.
Kelly
16 May 12
1 edit
Originally posted by twhitehead"That is largely because I don't recognise a separation between 'natural causes' and 'supernatural causes'. But this has nothing to do with 'blinders'. It has to do with reality. "
It does happen today, and I am sure we are both against it.
[b]Anything that may lead to there being God, god, or gods you are going to be
against automatically.
That makes no sense. How can something 'lead to there being God, god or gods?' To God(s) get created by something leading up to them?
You have a side when the topics are about Chri . I can back up my bias with fact/reasoning/argument and I am willing to. You can't.
[/b]Yes blinders since you don't know what caused everything to come into being so
you don't know what kind of cause, caused it...your bias nothing else rejects one
point of view.
Kelly