19 Jul 20
@ghost-of-a-duke saidIn Thread 180746 you were praising FMF to the heavens; let’s hope for Petewxyz’s sake that he doesn’t fall below your current expectations.
Pete is a splendid fellow. Happy to have him as a friend.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidThe quality of your response is not in question, and as you well know it was not and is not my point of interest. So why tell me about it.
What I know, is that I provided a perfectly splendid answer to your question (not about Suzianne specifically, but any Christian who accepts evolutionary thinking). Here it is again. Perhaps you'll absorb it more on a second reading:
'I'm assuming that Christians who have incorporated evolution into 'God's work' believe we have evolved into God's image.'
I’ll say it again so it’s clear; my challenge to you then was that, as you had done before, you stepped into to defend Suzianne when no defence was needed. She is more than capable of looking after herself and doesn’t require your clumsy incongruent pseudo-gallantry. You just make her look inept.
@divegeester saidDid you really just go and dig up a thread over a year old?
In Thread 180746 you were praising FMF to the heavens; let’s hope for Petewxyz’s sake that he doesn’t fall below your current expectations.
Ouch...
19 Jul 20
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYou really don't know what "fair weather friend" means?
The same meaning (or lack of meaning) your sentence had:
'I am sure petewxyz is happy to have your support for now as a fair weather friend.'
19 Jul 20
@ghost-of-a-duke said“I have detailed files”
Did you really just go and dig up a thread over a year old?
Ouch...
Arnold Schwarzenegger (Terminator 2)
@ghost-of-a-duke saidNever mind a year ago. You were saying similar things like that about me only a few weeks ago in our private forum. And I am exactly the same poster as I have been here for 12+ years.
Did you really just go and dig up a thread over a year old?
Ouch...
@divegeester saidI thought perhaps a second reading would make you aware I said 'I'm assuming Christians' not 'I believe Suzianne would say..."
The quality of your response is not in question, and as you well know it was not and is not my point of interest. So why tell me about it.
I’ll say it again so it’s clear; my challenge to you then was that, as you had done before, you stepped into to defend Suzianne when no defence was needed. She is more than capable of looking after herself and doesn’t require your clumsy incongruent pseudo-gallantry. You just make her look inept.
There is rather a distinct difference.
19 Jul 20
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI’m well aware of what you wrote, how you wrote it and why you wrote it the way you did.
I thought perhaps a second reading would make you aware I said 'I'm assuming Christians' not 'I believe Suzianne would say..."
There is rather a distinct difference.
Unlike Petewxyz, I didn’t arrive here with the last shower of heavy rain.
@fmf saidAs you said yourself, "What does that mean, if anything?"
Never mind a year ago. You were saying similar things like that about me only a few weeks ago in our private forum. And I am exactly the same poster as I have been here for 12+ years.
Why is me speaking well of Pete a reflection on you?
@divegeester saidOmniscient?
I’m well aware of what you wrote, how you wrote it and why you wrote it the way you did.
19 Jul 20
@ghost-of-a-duke saidThank you, likewise. Have a nice evening.
Pete is a splendid fellow. Happy to have him as a friend.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYou were Grampy Bobby's friend until you weren't. You were robbie carrobie's friend until you weren't. Do you really not know what the expression "fair weather friend" means?
As you said yourself, "What does that mean, if anything?"
Why is me speaking well of Pete a reflection on you?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYep ouch ...
Ouch...
Ghost of a Duke said
”He [FMF] is one of my favorite posters on this site. I like his dry sense of humour and clarity of thought.”
19 Jul 20
@ghost-of-a-duke saidJust agreeing with your cover story in your previous post and letting you know I am on to it.
Omniscient?