ATHEISM
“Life’s greatest tragedy is to lose God and not to miss him.”
--F.W. Norwood
Atheists might assert that they don’t acknowledge the existence of God, but the view of some Christians and all Muslims is that at some level even the confirmed Atheist affirms God’s presence. The innate but neglected awareness of God typically surfaces in Atheist consciousness only in times of severe stress, as exemplified by the World War II quote “There are no Atheists in a fox-hole.”1
Undeniably there are times -- whether during the agonizing days of a lingering illness, the seemingly eternal moments of a violent and humiliating mugging, or the split second of anticipating the impact of an imminent car crash -- when all mankind recognize the reality of human fragility and the lack of human control over destiny. Who does a person beseech for help in such circumstances other than The Creator? Such moments of desperation should remind every person, from the religious scholar to the professed Atheist, of the dependence of mankind upon a reality far greater than our own meager human selves. A reality far greater in knowledge, power, will, majesty and glory.
In such moments of distress, when all human efforts have failed and no element of material existence can be foreseen to provide comfort or rescue, Whom else will a person instinctively call upon? In such moments of trial, how many stress-induced appeals are made to God, complete with promises of lifelong fidelity? Yet, how few are kept?
No doubt, the day of greatest affliction will be the Day of Judgement, and a person would be unfortunate to be in the position of acknowledging the existence of God for the first time on that day. The English poet, Elizabeth Barrett Browning, spoke of the irony of the distressed human appeal in The Cry of the Human:
“And lips say “God be pitiful,”
Who ne’er said, “God be praised.”
The thoughtful Atheist, full of skepticism but fearful of the possibility of the existence of God and a Day of Judgement, may wish to consider the ‘prayer of the skeptic,’ as follows:
“O Lord--if there is a Lord,
Save my soul--if I have a soul.”2
In the face of skepticism blocking belief, how can a person go wrong with the above prayer? Should Atheists remain upon disbelief, they will be no worse off than before; should belief follow a sincere appeal, Thomas Jefferson had the following to say:
“If you find reason to believe there is a God, a consciousness that you are acting under His eye, and that He approves you, will be a vast additional incitement; if that there be a future state, the hope of a happy existence in that increases the appetite to deserve it…”3
The suggestion can be made that if an individual doesn’t see the evidence of God in the magnificence of His creation, they would be well advised to take another look. As Francis Bacon is noted to have commented, “I had rather believe all the fables in the legend, and the Talmud, and the alcoran (i.e. the Qur’an), than that this universal frame is without a mind.”4 He went on to comment, “God never wrought miracle to convince atheism, because his ordinary works convince it.”5 Worthy of contemplation is the fact that even the lowest elements of God’s creation, though perhaps ordinary works in His terms, are miracles in ours. Take the example of as tiny an animal as a spider. Does anybody really believe that such an extraordinarily intricate creature evolved from primordial soup? Just one of these little miracles can produce up to seven different kinds of silk, some as thin as the wavelength of visible light, but stronger than steel. Silks range from the elastic, sticky strands for entrapment to the non-adhesive drag-lines and frame threads, to the silk for wrapping prey, making the egg sac, etc. The spider can, on demand, not only manufacture its personal choice of the seven silks, but reabsorb, breakdown and remanufacture--self-recycling from the component elements. And this is only one small facet of the miracle of the spider.
And yet, mankind elevates itself to the heights of arrogance. A moment’s reflection should incline human hearts to humility. Look at a building and a person thinks of the architect, at a sculpture and a person instantly comprehends an artist. But examine the elegant intricacies of creation, from the complexity and balance of nuclear particle physics to the uncharted vastness of space, and a person conceives of…nothing? Surrounded by a world of synchronous complexities, we as mankind cannot even assemble the wing of a gnat. And yet the entire World and all the Universe exists in a state of perfect orchestration as a product of random accidents which molded cosmic chaos into balanced perfection? Some vote chance, others, creation.
Most Atheist arguments challenge the compatibility of an all-loving God with the perceived injustices of life. The religious identify such challenges as reflecting an arrogance of intellect -- being the assumption that we as mankind, an element of creation ourselves, know better than God how His creation should be ordered -- coupled with the failure to appreciate a larger design.
The fact that many of mankind fail to make sense of certain aspects of this life should not dissuade from belief in God. The duty of man is not to question or deny the attributes or presence of God, and not to incline to arrogance through professing to be able to do a better job, but rather to accept human station in this life and do the best that can be done with what we’ve been given. By analogy, the fact that a person does not like the way the boss does things at work, and fails to understand the decisions he makes, does not negate his existence. Rather, each person’s duty is to fulfill a job description in order to be paid and promoted. Similarly, failure to grasp or approve of the way God orders creation does not negate His existence. Rather, humankind should recognize with humility that, unlike the workplace boss, who may be wrong, God by definition is of absolute perfection, always right and never wrong. Humankind should bow down to Him in willing submission and in recognition that failure to understand His design on our part does not reflect error on His part. Rather, He is The Lord and Master of Creation and we are not, He knows all and we do not, He orders all affairs according to His perfect attributes, and we simply remain His subjects, along for the ride of our lives.
The confused and sensitive souls who encounter difficulty reconciling God’s existence with a harsh and often painful life deserve sympathy and explanation. If a person accepts the fact that God knows what He is doing and we don’t, he or she should rest comfortable with the understanding that deep down things may not be what they at first seem. Perhaps the wretched amongst humankind deserve their lot in life for reasons unforeseen, and perhaps they suffer only a short worldly existence to receive an eternal reward in the next life. Lest a person forget, God granted the favorites of His creation (i.e. the prophets) the greatest worldly gift of certainty, guidance and revelation; however, they suffered greatly in worldly terms. In fact, the trials and tribulations of most people pale in comparison to those of the prophets. So although many people do suffer terribly, the message of hope is that the archetypes of God’s favorites, namely the prophets, were deprived of the pleasures of this world in exchange for the rewards of the hereafter. A person might well expect a comparable reward for those who endure the trials and hardships of this life, while remaining steadfast upon true belief.
Similarly, a person cannot be faulted for expecting the disbelieving tyrants and oppressors to have all the enjoyments of this world, but none of the hereafter. Some of the known inmates of Hell spring to mind. Pharaoh, for example, lived a life of posh magnificence to the point that he proclaimed himself to be the supreme god. Most likely opinions changed when he broke wind. In any case, a person can reasonably expect him to be somewhat dissatisfied with his toasty abode of the moment, and the memories of his plush carpets, fine foods and scented handmaidens to have lost their charm of consolation given the heat of the moment.
Most people have had the experience of ending a great day in a bad mood due to some sour event at the conclusion of events. Nobody values a fine meal that ends in divorce, a romantic interlude rewarded with AIDS, or a night of revelry capped off by a brutal mugging or crippling car crash. How good could it have been? Similarly, there is no joy in this life, no matter how great the ecstasy or how long the duration, which is not instantly erased from memory by a 100% full body burn. One side of one hand represents 1% of the total body surface area of a human being, making a kitchen burn of a fraction of a fingertip count for less than a thousandth of the total body surface area. Nonetheless, who doesn’t forget absolutely every little, every big, everything during that moment of painful thermal affliction? The agony of a whole-body burn, especially if there is no relief -- no jumping back, no pulling away -- is beyond the capacity of human imagination. The few who have survived such burns agree. Not only does the torture of a total burn exceed the boundaries of human imagination, but the agony of the experience surpasses the limits of language. The horror can neither be adequately conveyed by the unfortunate of experience, nor fully understood by those blessed to have escaped initiation. Certainly one looooooong, eternal, full-body bath in fire can be expected to erase any pleasant memories of the past, consistent with the conclusion that “the life of this world is but little comfort in the Hereafter.” (TMQ, 13:26)
With regard to the subject of the present appendix, two elements of guiding consciousness deserve consideration, the first being that de...
Originally posted by webbinatorDude. The fact that your posts are being cut off before you reach their conclusion has got to be giving you an idea regarding the attention span of folks around here.
ATHEISM
“Life’s greatest tragedy is to lose God and not to miss him.”
--F.W. Norwood
Atheists might assert that they don’t acknowledge the existence of God, but the view of some Christians and all Muslims is that at some level even the confirmed Atheist affirms God’s presence. The innate but neglected awareness of God typically surfaces in Atheist ...[text shortened]... ppendix, two elements of guiding consciousness deserve consideration, the first being that de...
Try twittering it.
Originally posted by webbinatorThe claim that there are 'no atheists in the foxhole' is a myth. There are, and have been, many in the military who found no need or desire to appeal to a deity, even in times of great stress. American Atheist magazine has a regular column called 'Foxhole Atheist', which profiles such servicemen (and women).
ATHEISM
“Life’s greatest tragedy is to lose God and not to miss him.”
--F.W. Norwood
Atheists might assert that they don’t acknowledge the existence of God, but the view of some Christians and all Muslims is that at some level even the confirmed Atheist affirms God’s presence. The innate but neglected awareness of God typically surfaces in Atheist ...[text shortened]... ppendix, two elements of guiding consciousness deserve consideration, the first being that de...
Don't you think an allegedly omniscient god would be able to tell if prayers to him were made in earnest, or merely as a hedge against possible punishment? I doubt there would be any gods (assuming there are any at all) who would be flattered by such a half-hearted and conditional prayer. Plus you are assuming that the version of god you are praying to is the one that actually exists. It may be that there is a god who is offended by is offended by such cringing supplication.
Originally posted by webbinatorMakes one wonder why there are so many Christians on the battlefield! ๐
The innate but neglected awareness of God typically surfaces in Atheist consciousness only in times of severe stress, as exemplified by the World War II quote “There are no Atheists in a fox-hole.”
Originally posted by webbinatorYou should credit your source when you cut and paste something.
ATHEISM
“Life’s greatest tragedy is to lose God and not to miss him.”
--F.W. Norwood
Atheists might assert that they don’t acknowledge the existence of God, but the view of some Christians and all Muslims is that at some level even the confirmed Atheist affirms God’s presence. The innate but neglected awareness of God typically surfaces in Atheist ...[text shortened]... ppendix, two elements of guiding consciousness deserve consideration, the first being that de...
Originally posted by webbinatorOK, so how was the earthquake in Haiti necessary for the grand design?
Most Atheist arguments challenge the compatibility of an all-loving God with the perceived injustices of life. The religious identify such challenges as reflecting an arrogance of intellect -- being the assumption that we as mankind, an element of creation ourselves, know better than God how His creation should be ordered -- coupled with the failure to appreciate a larger design.
I don't see how it's arrogant to simply believe the most likely explanation [that there is no benevolent god presiding over our affairs]. Even in deciding who to trust, one uses the information available to him or her to decide if the individual seems trustworthy. This isn't arrogance, it's just good sense.
Originally posted by webbinatorIt depends on how you were brought up. Some atheists who were brought up as Christian, may call upon God in times of stress. But from what I have seen of other cultures, they call upon whatever entities their culture has taught them to, whether it be gods, deities, spirits, ancestors, saints or mere luck.
In such moments of distress, when all human efforts have failed and no element of material existence can be foreseen to provide comfort or rescue, Whom else will a person instinctively call upon?
I frequently see people who go to Church, nevertheless being superstitious and saying things like 'touch wood' or chucking salt over their shoulders. People tend to hedge their bets with whatever they know about - or think might remotely be true. A fairly significant proportion of Church goers do not really think there is an afterlife, but 'just in case' continue to act as if there might be.
Originally posted by webbinator“…Atheists might assert that they don’t acknowledge the existence of God,…”
ATHEISM
“Life’s greatest tragedy is to lose God and not to miss him.”
--F.W. Norwood
Atheists might assert that they don’t acknowledge the existence of God, but the view of some Christians and all Muslims is that at some level even the confirmed Atheist affirms God’s presence. The innate but neglected awareness of God typically surfaces in Atheist ...[text shortened]... ppendix, two elements of guiding consciousness deserve consideration, the first being that de...
What? They might say they don’t “acknowledge” the existence of God?
I know I wouldn’t because that makes no sense.
Would you say you don’t “acknowledge” the existence of the tooth fairy?
If they say or think they don’t “acknowledge” the existence of God then they are theists and not atheists.
“…The innate but neglected awareness of God typically surfaces in Atheist consciousness only in times of severe stress,…”
What would be the premise of you claim here that there exists this mysterious “innate but neglected awareness of God” in atheists? Can you show us the logical deduction or evidence that is the bases of this claim or is this claim just purely based on what you want to believe?
“…Most Atheist arguments challenge the compatibility of an all-loving God with the perceived injustices of life. The religious identify such challenges as reflecting an arrogance of intellect -- being the assumption that we as mankind, an element of creation ourselves, know BETTER than GOD how His creation should be ordered -- ….” (my emphasis)
Well, IF that is what the “religious” generally belief as you claim , then what they believe is a logical contradiction: how can somebody think he knows better than something he doesn’t believe exists?
Do you arrogantly know better about teeth than the tooth fairy? ๐
Also, it is sometimes the atheist that sees some theists as being supremely arrogant; specifically by some (not all) theists assuming that the human race is a special creation of an all powerful and knowing “God”. For atheists that accept the scientific fact that we evolved and understand that there is no “pinnacle” of the tree of evolution were we totter, they humbly accept we are just a side branch of evolution albeit with unusually high adaptive intelligence compared with all other animals and also we evolved from a much less intelligent hairy not-so-pretty ape-like ancestor; no arrogance there!
Originally posted by Andrew Hamilton“…Atheists might assert that they don’t acknowledge the existence of God,…”
“…Atheists might assert that they don’t acknowledge the existence of God,…”
What? They might say they don’t “acknowledge” the existence of God?
I know I wouldn’t because that makes no sense.
Would you say you don’t “acknowledge” the existence of the tooth fairy?
If they say or think they don’t “acknowledge” the existence of God then they are th ...[text shortened]... evolved from a much less intelligent hairy not-so-pretty ape-like ancestor; no arrogance there!
What? They might say they don’t “acknowledge” the existence of God?
I know I wouldn’t because that makes no sense.
Would you say you don’t “acknowledge” the existence of the tooth fairy?
If they say or think they don’t “acknowledge” the existence of God then they are theists and not atheists.
It makes good sense actually...for the declaration God exists, not acknowledging it means I don't agree with the declaration or find it valid. Thus if I don't acknowledge the existence of God then I simply don't believe in God.
So how do athiests respond to Nietchzes claim that "God is dead"?
I think he was reffering to the christian god but I haven't delved into it very deeply. Either way that claim seems to have openned a whole can of worms for theists and athiests. Its an example of how some things just need to be said, despite how silly it may sound. I guess its just a silly response to a silly premise,ie. a crhistian god.
Originally posted by lauseyHave you ever had any "divine feelings"?
I have been in a car crash where I thought I was about to die. I never had any divine feelings at any point.
Why would you expect "divine feelings" when you are in a car crash? Because you were expecting to die?
(I'm just not sure what you are responding to or what it is exactly that you are trying to assert).
Originally posted by karoly aczelOk, should have clarified. I was responding to the "No atheists in fox holes" and the implication that people change their minds about the existence of a higher power when under extreme stress situations where death is probably imminent.
Have you ever had any "divine feelings"?
Why would you expect "divine feelings" when you are in a car crash? Because you were expecting to die?
(I'm just not sure what you are responding to or what it is exactly that you are trying to assert).
Originally posted by lauseyOk.
Ok, should have clarified. I was responding to the "No atheists in fox holes" and the implication that people change their minds about the existence of a higher power when under extreme stress situations where death is probably imminent.
I see where you are going with that...
I dont think we can fathom Gods will or the way that "He" interacts with us ignorant people. Its probably best that people stay athiests.
I just like to distinguish between people that have had an "insight" and then turn religous/spiritual as opposed to the people that just regurgitate what their parents/community told them.
I wouldn't mention Jesus unless I actually spoke to him or heard him speak to me. Even then I would check the most obvious explanations for my experince before jumping to conclusions.