Atheist Circular Reasoning

Originally posted by @wolfgang59
I'm not saying Goad doesn't know the Bible ...
I'm just saying it is not necessary that he does.

Originally posted by @fmf
Ghost of a Duke is knowledgeable about Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism and some other religions that he's offered some interesting thoughts on. Nobody thinks he is "lying" about having a Bachelor's Degree in Theology, not even Romans1009 does. Ghost of a Duke is simply being trolled, day in day out, that's all. Romans1009 must have accused Ghos ...[text shortened]... out 100 times or more. 150 times, maybe. Often 4 or 5 times in the same day. It's just trolling.

Originally posted by @wolfgang59
Agreed.

Originally posted by @stellspalfie
For clarity, I was not asserting that the claim itself was true or untrue, only that I did not find the source provided trustworthy enough to accept their claim.

The poster seemed to be stating we should accept the claim as true because several very good attorneys had claimed it to be true. Which seems to be an illogical claim.

" I just saw a lot of ignorant mocking. You expect me to take you seriously?" Romans.


I strongly advise Romans to pay heed to his own words. Ignorant mocking of others will indeed result in people not taking him seriously. Not to mention of course being deeply non-biblical.


'Let no corrupting talk come out of your mouths, but only such as is good for building up, as fits the occasion, that it may give grace to those who hear.'

Ephesians 4:29

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
" I just saw a lot of ignorant mocking. You expect me to take you seriously?" Romans.


I strongly advise Romans to pay heed to his own words. Ignorant mocking of others will indeed result in people not taking him seriously. Not to mention of course being deeply non-biblical.


'Let no corrupting talk come out of your mouths, but only such as ...[text shortened]... building up, as fits the occasion, that it may give grace to those who hear.'

Ephesians 4:29

Originally posted by @romans1009
That’s not at all what I said.

I cited the three experts in evaluating evidence who found the evidence for Jesus Christ’s Resurrection to be overwhelming as a rebuttal to the idea that such an opinion was worthy of mocking and ridicule.

Originally posted by @stellspalfie
Being an 'expert' does not exempt one from ridicule.

Originally posted by @romans1009
You don’t think Solomon existed? Do you think Jesus Christ existed?

Originally posted by @wolfgang59
Scant evidence for both.
Although Solomon is more believable than JC.

Originally posted by @romans1009
Even secular historians believe Jesus Christ existed and was crucified.

Romans1009: I just saw a lot of ignorant mocking. You expect me to take you seriously?

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
I strongly advise Romans to pay heed to his own words. Ignorant mocking of others will indeed result in people not taking him seriously. Not to mention of course being deeply non-biblical.

Originally posted by @fmf
I get the impression that he sees it as his personal online disinhibition/anonymity version of the "Great Commission". I think we are supposed to be seeing evidence of "God's Holy Spirit" indwelling in him here.

Originally posted by @romans1009
It should if the opinion they’re offering is in the field in which they’re an expert - unless the person doing the ridiculing is a troll, of course.

Originally posted by @romans1009
I cited the three experts in evaluating evidence who found the evidence for Jesus Christ’s Resurrection to be overwhelming as a rebuttal to the idea that such an opinion was worthy of mocking and ridicule.