Originally posted by sonhouseSo you are saying that it is morally wrong for the creator of life to take a life when he sees fit?
So you figure somehow YOU are worthy of some teleportation trick by your god while millions of infants die from starvation or cancer, never to receive help from your god.
Don't you see that as just the slightest but arrogant? A god would single YOU out and ignore real suffering?
According to your moral code ?
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkAh, you mean your imaginary friend. I see no sign of your friend but I see a lot of death and what miracles performed are from modern medicine not some deity going, ok, you get to live, but you 200 million victims of war, too bad.
So you are saying that it is morally wrong for the creator of life to take a life when he sees fit?
According to your moral code ?
10 Aug 16
Originally posted by sonhouseHold on so you are blaming an imaginary being for people's death?
Ah, you mean your imaginary friend. I see no sign of your friend but I see a lot of death and what miracles performed are from modern medicine not some deity going, ok, you get to live, but you 200 million victims of war, too bad.
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkActually, I think it is according to the moral code of the bible. Unless you are referencing a God who wants us to do what he says, not what he does?
So you are saying that it is morally wrong for the creator of life to take a life when he sees fit?
According to your moral code ?
Sonhouse spoke of 'millions of infants who die from starvation or cancer.' Is you position seriously that due to your God creating these lives it is morally acceptable for him to take them as he sees fit?
Does a father have the moral justification to kill his son, due to him giving that son life? A supreme being should be the perfect role model for the moral code he establishes in the bible. - To 'take a life as he sees fit' seems to operate outside of this moral code.