Originally posted by Rajk999But it remains true that the worlds religious organizations could abolish hunger and that they too are guilty of greed which contradicts their teaching.
I know this is way off topic but more money is not going to solve the starvation problem. Excluding the wealth of the religious groups, the world currently has enough food, enough technical know-how and financial resources to feed everyone. The problems are population distribution, food distribution, greed and politics. Capitalism is partly to blame for the greed part, but its also the reason for the bumper harvests.
What no respones...
Weak.
Pathatic.
That was all you got?
Does that qualefy as TKO then?
First I won over red mike the prestupitenien pupil then joseph then you. I thought you would have more to come with.
I didnt even have to start refering to books and facts yet.
What is it all about any way?
They start out the same place and now I am not talking about what the bible says. Now I am talking about what science can prove.
The thing is one of the oldes now living belife is Jews but the begining had its origin in Egypt but under a diffrent name back then but its thought to besome sort of belife in in one god that came about around Agnoton ( he is the one who started this mess). And then in turn much of what has transspired we all know to well.
Out of this we have to day christianaty and the muslimic faith. So what am now saying with all this: well their is more that should bond us then devide us and this is a great platform for peace.
To theprotectors,
I find it ironic that your post begins with calling people "weak" and "pathetic", and then ends with a call to peace. Way to prove your point there.
In regards to your claiming to have won arguments against many folks on this topic, you need to understand something. The reason someone may not respond to your post is not because you have provided irrefutable arguments, but because no one can understand them. They are full of run-on sentences, missing punctuation, misspellings, random thought processes, and missing words.
I don't mean to be insulting, but you were the one calling people names. No one wants to have an intelligent conversation with someone who can't express their thoughts in a way that makes sense.
Take more time to be a little more organized how you make your point and be more respectful. In this way, you may have more satisfying debates.
Originally posted by AProdigyTo AProdigy you talk of being ironicand me calling people names and me missing punctuation, misspellings and so on.
To theprotectors,
I find it ironic that your post begins with calling people "weak" and "pathetic", and then ends with a call to peace. Way to prove your point there.
In regards to your claiming to have won arguments against many folks on this topic, you need to understand something. The reason someone may not respond to your post is not because y ...[text shortened]... ake your point and be more respectful. In this way, you may have more satisfying debates.
This all true but you try do this in some one elses mothertung and then come back to me, futher more it was the point of it being ironic and sending a message and I dont think I misspell as bad as I have seen others do here.
I am how ever trying my best not misspell as much.
But you guys cant even read between the lines and read what one is acctully trying to say
Originally posted by theprotectorstheProtector,
To AProdigy you talk of being ironicand me calling people names and me missing punctuation, misspellings and so on.
This all true but you try do this in some one elses mothertung and then come back to me, futher more it was the point of it being ironic and sending a message and I dont think I misspell as bad as I have seen others do here.
I am how ev ...[text shortened]... much.
But you guys cant even read between the lines and read what one is acctully trying to say
Listen, my friend. I do certainly appreciate your communicating in English and did suspect that it was not your native language. The grammatic short comings are understandable and forgiven, of course. I speak a bit of Indonesian, but could never carry on a conversation about religion with it. So you are to be commended for that.
However, writing is such a way as to hide a message "between the lines" takes a clever, crafty wordsmith. It is not fair to insult others for not understanding what really couldn't be understood from your reading your posts. Perhaps you should try to say what you mean to say and leave nothing between the lines...
Originally posted by AProdigyTo AProdigy
theProtector,
Listen, my friend. I do certainly appreciate your communicating in English and did suspect that it was not your native language. The grammatic short comings are understandable and forgiven, of course. I speak a bit of Indonesian, but could never carry on a conversation about religion with it. So you are to be commended for that.
How ...[text shortened]... s. Perhaps you should try to say what you mean to say and leave nothing between the lines...
Yes you speak Indonesian a bit, but my understanding of English is far greater then a bit. But I can have conversation in other language. you can't. And for my my grammatic short coming I guess you have a half a point their. Btw thank you for that commendation ( is that right spellt?)
But I did come here to talk about my or yours short comings I here to give my 2 cents worth.