Calling out KellyJay

Originally posted by @fmf
KellyJay might appreciate your selfless, unprincipled support for him, but he might not appreciate the fact that you clearly cannot discern what he actually meant.

Could Kelly's post possibly be referring to anyone other than Divegeester? Yes or No?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
You must be seeing your own facial expressions on your screen.

Can you really not discern what my reference to an inability to interpret facial expressions meant?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Could Kelly's post possibly be referring to anyone other than Divegeester? Yes or No?

Read the thread about "evil" again. If you cannot understand what happened there, then so be it.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Could Kelly's post possibly be referring to anyone other than Divegeester?

No, I don't think so. Are you unfamiliar with KellyJay's posting since the disagreement about the rights of government to intervene to protect children? Have you not been following it?

Originally posted by @fmf
No, I don't think so. Are you unfamiliar with KellyJay's posting since the disagreement about the rights of government to intervene to protect children? Have you not been following it?

I think we both know that since he did not specifically mention Divegeester in the 'reprimand' it could have been aimed at any number of people.

Originally posted by @fmf
Can you really not discern what my reference to an inability to interpret facial expressions meant?

Can you really not see that I was poking fun at your facial expressions reference?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
I think we both know that since he did not specifically mention Divegeester in the 'reprimand' it could have been aimed at any number of people.

Just read the thread again. I don't think divegeester "specifically mentioned" the Abrahamic God by that name either. Can you discern that that was what he meant though?

I think this admission by you yesterday applies to your intellectual behaviour on this matter:

I lived isolated from the real world for more than 20 years. So maybe I am almost a teen in terms of experiencing the real world.

You are not able to discern stuff because, by your own admission, you are "almost a teen".

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Can you really not see that I was poking fun at your facial expressions reference?

It was a reference to autistic teens not being able to interpret what the adults around them are thinking or what their words mean. Even with your retort, I don't know if you understood it. But now I have explained what I meant, so I think you get it now.

Originally posted by @fmf
Just read the thread again. I don't think divegeester "specifically mentioned" the Abrahamic God by that name either. Can you discern that that was what he meant though?

I think this admission by you yesterday applies to your intellectual behaviour on this matter:

[b]I lived isolated from the real world for more than 20 years. So maybe I am almost a teen ...[text shortened]... b]

You are not able to discern stuff because, by your own admission, you are "almost a teen".

Wow it seems any teen could easily be more discerning than you. You're just clutching at straws. It seems the fact that Kelly has been ignoring you and your pal has really got to you and it's affecting your discernment.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Wow it seems any teen could easily be more discerning than you. You're just clutching at straws. It seems the fact that Kelly has been ignoring you and your pal has really got to you and it's affecting your discernment.

Plough on, by all means.

Originally posted by @fmf
It was a reference to autistic teens not being able to interpret what the adults around them are thinking or what their words mean. Even with your retort, I don't know if you understood it. But now I have explained what I meant, so I think you get it now.

Your ad hominems are like water off a ducks back.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Your ad hominems are like water off a ducks back.

You admitted to being damaged by your supposed cult experience and you have admitted to being a de facto adolescent among grown ups as a result. If they are 'ad hominems', then so be it. They are things you have admitted about yourself, not things I have made up. Personally, I think they explain a lot about how you acquit yourself here.

Originally posted by @fmf
You admitted to being damaged by your supposed cult experience and you have admitted to being a de facto adolescent among grown ups as a result. If they are 'ad hominems', then so be it. They are things you have admitted about yourself, not things I have made up. Personally, I think they explain a lot about how you acquit yourself here.

Again putting words in my mouth as you always do.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Again putting words in my mouth as you always do.

I'd characterize it as listening to - and understanding the meaning of - the words that come out of your mouth. Not putting words in it.

Originally posted by @fmf
I'd characterize it as listening to - and understanding the meaning of - the words that come out of your mouth. Not putting words in it.

I see it as twisting them to suit your agenda.