13 Dec 05
I dont remember anything anywhere about man not laying with two women...I also dont remember anything about two women not laying with each other. It only states that man is not to lay with man....
There is that marriage thing, but what if you have two wives? (And there are a few Biblical religions that allow more than one wife) Can you lay with both at the same time? Anything against a hot threesome?
13 Dec 05
Originally posted by KnightWulfeYou're such a tramp, KDub.
I dont remember anything anywhere about man not laying with two women...I also dont remember anything about two women not laying with each other. It only states that man is not to lay with man....
There is that marriage thing, but what if you have two wives? (And there are a few Biblical religions that allow more than one wife) Can you lay with both at the same time? Anything against a hot threesome?
13 Dec 05
Originally posted by KnightWulfeYou'll find a lot of things that aren't mentioned in any given book.
I dont remember anything anywhere about man not laying with two women...I also dont remember anything about two women not laying with each other. It only states that man is not to lay with man....
There is that marriage thing, but what if you have two wives? (And there are a few Biblical religions that allow more than one wife) Can you lay with both at the same time? Anything against a hot threesome?
13 Dec 05
Originally posted by KnightWulfeMost guys don't know what to do with 1, let alone 2 🙂
I dont remember anything anywhere about man not laying with two women...I also dont remember anything about two women not laying with each other. It only states that man is not to lay with man....
There is that marriage thing, but what if you have two wives? (And there are a few Biblical religions that allow more than one wife) Can you lay with both at the same time? Anything against a hot threesome?
13 Dec 05
Originally posted by KnightWulfeYou can have a thousand women if you're an Israeli King. The book never says if you can have two at once, but hey, if you've got a thousand, you have to squeeze them into the calendar somehow.
I dont remember anything anywhere about man not laying with two women...I also dont remember anything about two women not laying with each other. It only states that man is not to lay with man....
There is that marriage thing, but what if you have two wives? (And there are a few Biblical religions that allow more than one wife) Can you lay with both at the same time? Anything against a hot threesome?
13 Dec 05
Originally posted by dagsThis is very true....But I am not most guys (so I have been told) 😀 - HOWEVER, that is not the point of the question....
Most guys don't know what to do with 1, let alone 2 🙂
I am really curious how that is viewed. It says that man cant "lay" with man, but nothing about woman with woman or man with two women (or more).
How are those viewed by the church?
13 Dec 05
Originally posted by KnightWulfeSame difference.
This is very true....But I am not most guys (so I have been told) 😀 - HOWEVER, that is not the point of the question....
I am really curious how that is viewed. It says that man cant "lay" with man, but nothing about woman with woman or man with two women (or more).
How are those viewed by the church?
1 man, 1 woman, and perhaps some chains...😵
13 Dec 05
Originally posted by TetsujinI think those who care rule out the woman-on-woman thing with Paul's sweetest little love letter, Romans.
Same difference.
1 man, 1 woman, and perhaps some chains...😵
" 24Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.
26Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. 27In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion."
Romans 1:24-27
Paul was such a tool.
13 Dec 05
1 edit
Originally posted by telerionWhat was he saying is unnatural? Were they sleeping with dead people? Horses? Dogs? Cattle? It does not specify what they were doing.... With the Romans, it is really hard to say WHAT they were doing.....
26Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones...
13 Dec 05
Originally posted by TetsujinActually yes.... It has been observed in nature, with animals that male with be with male and female will be with female. They bond as a mated couple. Observations have been made through hundreds of species that this occurs....
does it really matter?
So it would seem that female with female is a natural occurance (as is male with male, for that matter) - So how is it unnatural?
Cross-species and necrophelia dont occur but in very rare circumstance. - Are they unnatural?
It makes a difference...
13 Dec 05
Originally posted by KnightWulfeAnything that happens in natural.
Actually yes.... It has been observed in nature, with animals that male with be with male and female will be with female. They bond as a mated couple. Observations have been made through hundreds of species that this occurs....
So it would seem that female with female is a natural occurance (as is male with male, for that matter) - So how is it unnatu ...[text shortened]... elia dont occur but in very rare circumstance. - Are they unnatural?
It makes a difference...
If I have a liking for the old dead guys, then that too is natural.
Define natural to me. Where exactly does natural end from a non-religious perspective?