Spirituality
18 Aug 11
18 Aug 11
1 edit
nope! YOU can't! You might want to keep your distance from computers in the future otherwise they might blow up when trying to microwave something! Indeed the respective sciences which lead to these devices are just a sequence of seemingly lucky guesses.
I'll know if you haven't taken my advice btw 😞
18 Aug 11
Originally posted by AgergWe can get good results from science as long as we don't have
nope! YOU can't! You might want to keep your distance from computers in the future otherwise they might blow up when trying to microwave something! Indeed the respective sciences which lead to these devices are just a sequence of seemingly lucky guesses.
I'll know if you haven't taken my advice btw 😞
scientist that have a bias and agenda against God. It doen't
hurt to make a few lucky guesses along the way as long as
the person doing the science is not making all guesses like most
of those dealing with evolution and the age of the universe.
18 Aug 11
Originally posted by RJHindsYou didn't take my advice. I'm only thinking of you! 😞
We can get good results from science as long as we don't have
scientist that have a bias and agenda against God. It doen't
hurt to make a few lucky guesses along the way as long as
the person doing the science is not making all guesses like most
of those dealing with evolution and the age of the universe.
18 Aug 11
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsWhat a weird little black and white word you must live in. There are scientists who believe in God who also accept the evidence for evolution, Kenneth Miller springs to mind -
We can get good results from science as long as we don't have
scientist that have a bias and agenda against God. It doen't
hurt to make a few lucky guesses along the way as long as
the person doing the science is not making all guesses like most
of those dealing with evolution and the age of the universe.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_R._Miller
There are also scientists who believe in God who also accept the age of the universe as older than 10,00 years. Here's one of jaywill's favourites -
http://www.reasons.org/
Do these scientists have a 'biased agenda' towards God?! Explain that one to me.
18 Aug 11
Originally posted by RJHindsi am grateful.
This is a good advertisement for science over religion.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRLR9jhP_DM&NR=1&feature=fvwp
the youtube you provided has lead me to other videos by thethinkingatheist that entertained me all day.
try and view "the creation story" and "noah's ark : god, giraffes and genocides".
also top 10 creationist arguments part 1 and 2.
18 Aug 11
Originally posted by Proper KnobMaybe one or the other. However, I would doubt if they ever amount
What a weird little black and white word you must live in. There are scientists who believe in God who also accept the evidence for evolution, Kenneth Miller springs to mind -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_R._Miller
There are also scientists who believe in God who also accept the age of the universe as older than 10,00 years. Here's one of ...[text shortened]... ons.org/
Do these scientists have a 'biased agenda' towards God?! Explain that one to me.
to anything.
18 Aug 11
Originally posted by ZahlanziIt may be entertaining, but unlike the one I linked, the others are filled
i am grateful.
the youtube you provided has lead me to other videos by thethinkingatheist that entertained me all day.
try and view "the creation story" and "noah's ark : god, giraffes and genocides".
also top 10 creationist arguments part 1 and 2.
with half-truths and lies. So be careful for you might get suckered in by
them.
18 Aug 11
Originally posted by divegeesterI think you are talking about the weatherman. I don't consider
The only scientists you can't trust are the meteorologists.
them scientist because all their predictions are educated guesses.
It may be classified a science, but it is not an exact science because
they got much to learn from God.