Spirituality
05 May 17
Originally posted by josephwsonship has posted maybe thousands of times ~ across dozens of threads over a period of years ~ about his doctrine of torture for eternity of non-believers. What on earth do you mean, you "didn't read the post"?
I didn't read the post where sonship said "God is a torturer God", and I question whether that's just your usual way of spreading bs.
Originally posted by divegeesterCorrect, decent people don't hang out here.
Apparently, according to his profile, @robbie-carrobie has decided this is no place (RHP) for a Jehovah's Witness. I remember you saying this a few times Galveston75, but you're still here.
I wonder if this really has more to do with Robbie being caught up in, and found out in the Clans cheating debacle which is currently being debated here: [threadi ...[text shortened]... in this Spirituality forum, especially seeing as he was ignoring most of his detractors anyway.
08 May 17
Originally posted by josephwFMF is welcome to, and does, attack me for my Christianity. You draw flack primarily because of your own beliefs within Christianity e.g. Eternal suffering. You also discredit yourself by conflating biblical principle with general forum banter e.g you throwing scripture out as insults.
[b]"Perhaps he was never a Christian."
Obviously.
"Perhaps your definition of Christian is wrong."
How can I be wrong when it is God that defines Christian?
"Perhaps he is not interested in your threats..."
Threats? Don't be obtuse. I make observations based on what another says.
Easy for you isn't it dive? FMF never cal ...[text shortened]... orizontal about your beliefs on the vertical. That is, if you think you can handle the pressure.[/b]
I've stood for Christ in this forum many times and will do so again.
Originally posted by josephwThis is a debate forum not a Christian club. Issues debated here are critical pivot points in spiritual morality, religious credibility and biblical efficacy. Eternal torment and some of the other nonsense preached in here brings the gospel of Jesus Christ into mockery from atheists and if you don't believe in the teaching you should contend for the truth instead of hiding in the "club".
I don't take stands against Christians. I take a stand for Christ. I have, in the past, debated with a few of the things other believers have said about their beliefs on some topics.
This forum isn't a Christian debate forum where Christians discuss doctrine. I'm not a follower of everything sonship believes, nor do I take the time to read all his lengthy ...[text shortened]... Too bad though, since you've heard the truth, that you'll be without excuse when Jesus appears.
09 May 17
Can anyone now provide a plausible reason why robbie would choose to return to this forum?
It is likely that attempts would be made to attack his character over issues in the clan arena, along with his JW beliefs. Why would he want to subject himself to that?
Is there a way for him to return?
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29601
09 May 17
Originally posted by chaney3Controversy over Robbie's clan activity and religious beliefs are nothing new and this has not prevented him 'subjecting' himself to it over the passing years. One could even argue, he thrives on it.
Can anyone now provide a plausible reason why robbie would choose to return to this forum?
It is likely that attempts would be made to attack his character over issues in the clan arena, along with his JW beliefs. Why would he want to subject himself to that?
Is there a way for him to return?
Originally posted by divegeesterThe mans loyalty is with the club.
This is a debate forum not a Christian club. Issues debated here are critical pivot points in spiritual morality, religious credibility and biblical efficacy. Eternal torment and some of the other nonsense preached in here brings the gospel of Jesus Christ into mockery from atheists and if you don't believe in the teaching you should contend for the truth instead of hiding in the "club".
Originally posted by chaney3Nobody (except you) cares.
Can anyone now provide a plausible reason why robbie would choose to return to this forum?
It is likely that attempts would be made to attack his character over issues in the clan arena, along with his JW beliefs. Why would he want to subject himself to that?
Is there a way for him to return?
They guy is a nasty little weasel with a cultish agenda and who contributed very little to this forum as his online brand equity diminished due to his silly behaviour.
Originally posted by FMFI sonship have hardly written 1,000 posts on the subject of eternal punishment.
sonship has posted maybe thousands of times ~ across dozens of threads over a period of years ~ about his doctrine of torture for eternity of non-believers. What on earth do you mean, you "didn't read the post"?
I would guess that of the thousands of posts I have written maybe 40 to 50 have been dedicated extensively to defending or clarifying something about the lake of fire or eternal punishment. Maybe I could recall as many as 70 or 80 in over a decade which were some sort of apologetic of my belief in response to criticisms.
Don't let FMF hoodwink you into imagining that this has been a favorite subject of mine.
sonship from gswilm's PC.
Originally posted by gswilmIt is simple stuff like this that makes me wonder about you. How can you preach to anyone? Your brain lacks the ability to reason, to think, to analyse, to understand,. What people call common sense is lacking in you.
I [b]sonship have hardly written 1,000 posts on the subject of eternal punishment.
I would guess that of the thousands of posts I have written maybe 40 to 50 have been dedicated extensively to defending or clarifying something about the lake of fire or eternal punishment. Maybe I could recall as many as 70 or 80 in over a decade which were some ...[text shortened]... imagining that this has been a favorite subject of mine.
sonship from gswilm's PC.[/b]
What am I speaking of? How is it that in umpteen years you have not figured out how to login with your username from another mans computer? Just one example of many.