23 Dec 16
Originally posted by EladarWhether ANY behavior is, or is not, sin is not germane to this discussion. I notice you do this a lot, you introduce side issues and then claim there is some equivalence when that is not the point.
So you agree that homosexuality is sin?
Only Pharisees waste their time judging others, and then withhold favor based on their judgement.
23 Dec 16
Originally posted by SuzianneActually it is because we are discussing sin and acceptance of sin. We are instructed to hand the brother who is living in sin over to the devil.
Whether ANY behavior is, or is not, sin is not germane to this discussion. I notice you do this a lot, you introduce side issues and then claim there is some equivalence when that is not the point.
Only Pharisees waste their time judging others, and then withhold favor based on their judgement.
You want to play games. That's fine.
Originally posted by EladarThen you are flat out ignoring the post which led you to attempt this subject-changing thread. You continue to avoid feeling any tolerance for others who are not like you. This is not what Jesus taught. We are told to love others as we love ourselves. Somehow you started believing that it is okay to hate and denigrate others, just because they are not like you.
Actually it is because we are discussing sin and acceptance of sin. We are instructed to hand the brother who is living in sin over to the devil.
You want to play games. That's fine.
23 Dec 16
Originally posted by SuzianneI have no problem with non christians living in sin, it is expected.
Then you are flat out ignoring the post which led you to attempt this subject-changing thread. You continue to avoid feeling any tolerance for others who are not like you. This is not what Jesus taught. We are told to love others as we love ourselves. Somehow you started believing that it is okay to hate and denigrate others, just because they are not like you.
My only problem arises when the sin is introduced into the body and accepted.
Originally posted by EladarCould you give an example of something about which you are tolerant, in the sense of having "endurance, fortitude" (in the face of pain, hardship, etc.)? Could anyone here?
Glad to know that I am indeed tolerant. I'll need to correct the next liberal who accuses me of being intollerant.
If seems to me that the meaning of so-called Christian tolerance is disapproval without acting as you are called upon to act on that disapproval. Which is hypocritical on its face, unless there are Biblical entreaties not to act on one's Biblical disapproval.
Such as John 8.7 where Jesus tells the accusers of a woman of adultery, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
Is this not widely applicable?
23 Dec 16
Originally posted by JS357Oh you mean in one definition of the term.
Could you give an example of something about which you are tolerant, in the sense of having "endurance, fortitude" (in the face of pain, hardship, etc.)? Could anyone here?
If seems to me that the meaning of so-called Christian tolerance is disapproval without acting as you are called upon to act on that disapproval. Which is hypocritical on its face, unles ...[text shortened]... t is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
Is this not widely applicable?
Blah blah blah
23 Dec 16
Originally posted by JS357What did casting stones mean?
Could you give an example of something about which you are tolerant, in the sense of having "endurance, fortitude" (in the face of pain, hardship, etc.)? Could anyone here?
If seems to me that the meaning of so-called Christian tolerance is disapproval without acting as you are called upon to act on that disapproval. Which is hypocritical on its face, unles ...[text shortened]... t is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
Is this not widely applicable?
Death penalty.
I do not propose we kill sinners so yes I am applying it.
24 Dec 16
Originally posted by EladarGood to see that you are against capital punishment.
What did casting stones mean?
Death penalty.
I do not propose we kill sinners so yes I am applying it.
Perhaps the teachings of Jesus while He walked the Earth are not completely lost on you.
24 Dec 16
Originally posted by ThinkOfOneI am against capital punishment? By individuals, sure as long as the government does its job.
Good to see that you are against capital punishment.
Perhaps the teachings of Jesus while He walked the Earth are not completely lost on you.
Originally posted by EladarSo you do "propose we kill sinners" unlike you claimed.
I am against capital punishment? By individuals, sure as long as the government does its job.
Well, I figured that that was more likely the case. Thought I'd give you the benefit of the doubt.
So much for "perhaps the teachings of Jesus while He walked the Earth are not completely lost on you."
24 Dec 16
Originally posted by ThinkOfOneDidn't recall Jesus saying that the government could not uphold capital punishment. Just liberal glasses ruuning your vision. Too much to the left for you. You should be more like me neither right nor left.
So you do "propose we kill sinners" unlike you claimed.
Well, I figured that that was more likely the case. Thought I'd give you the benefit of the doubt.
So much for "perhaps the teachings of Jesus while He walked the Earth are not completely lost on you."
Originally posted by EladarOh, I get it.
Didn't recall Jesus saying that the government could not uphold capital punishment. Just liberal glasses ruuning your vision. Too much to the left for you. You should be more like me neither right nor left.
When Jesus says this:
"He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her."
What you see is this:
"He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her. [Except for those in government who should feel free to cast away. And for those who still condemn this woman to death, allow those in the government to serve as your proxy in casting your stone]."
And when you wrote:
"I do not propose we kill sinners."
What you meant was:
"I do not propose we kill sinners. 'We', of course, does not include those in government. I do propose we have those in government kill sinners."
24 Dec 16
Originally posted by ThinkOfOneWas he speaking to a individuals or the courts?
Oh, I get it.
When Jesus says this:
"He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her."
What you see is this:
"He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her. [Except for those in government who should feel free to cast away. And for those who still condemn this woman to death, allow those in the government ...[text shortened]... e, does not include those in government. I do propose we have those in government kill sinners."
I'm sure you won't be able to see the difference.