Originally posted by FMFI have no interest in discussing the subject with someone who has not put forth any effort to educate themselves about it. That would be you.
But this generic deflection doesn't answer the specific question about "mandatory reporting", robbie.
Its not a generic deflection, its self evident, you can tell us nothing about the Royal commissions report because you have not read it. why have you not read it? because you have no interest in the subject other than what you can use to leverage against others.
Originally posted by FMFOh dear can you tell us why you ave not read the Royal commissions report?
There he goes again.
Can you tell us if sexting between minors should be reported to the authorities?
Can you tell us out of the 1002 recorded instance shown to the Royal commission how many involved rape?
27 Dec 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieBut I'm asking you about "mandatory reporting" and "no mandatory reporting".You just mention them, but then refuse to discuss the implications and the moral imperatives that exist either way.
Oh dear can you tell us why you ave not read the Royal commissions report?
Originally posted by FMFand I am asking you about this.
But I'm asking you about "mandatory reporting" and "no mandatory reporting".You just mention them, but then refuse to discuss the implications and the moral imperatives that exist either way.
Can you tell us why you have not read the Royal commissions report?
Can you tell us if sexting between minors should be reported to the authorities?
Can you tell us out of the 1002 recorded instance shown to the Royal commission how many involved rape?
Can you tell us why Jehovahs witnesses are different from say the Catholic church with regard to types of abuse?
Can you tell us anything about the issue?
27 Dec 16
Originally posted by FMFSo you cannot tell us a single thing, thankyou for proving what an ignorant and uninterested troll you are. The best part, you did it all by yourself.
OK then. I have been deflected. The question remains unanswered. If you are operating according to some kind of corporate briefing, then it is hanging you out to dry. If it's your own idea to behave this way, I'd think again, robbie.
Try this, its a good place to begin.
http://royalcommission.com.au
27 Dec 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThe question is why does the "mandatory reporting" thing make any difference to you in the case of reporting such serious crimes against children? I won't find your answer to that question at http://royalcommission.com.au
http://royalcommission.com.au
Originally posted by FMFNo but at least you will educate yourself and not make uncorroborated remarks like accusing others of covering up rape of minors when you have no knowledge of anything that transpired and of what type of sexual abuse was perpetrated and recorded.
The question is why does the "mandatory reporting" thing make any difference to you in the case of reporting such serious crimes against children? I won't find your answer to that question at http://royalcommission.com.au
Its such I'll informed opinions like yours that prevents frank and open discussion because the projection of your ignorance only knows child abuse from a single perspective and assumes that all sexual child abuse takes the same form.
As to your question regarding mandatory reporting, its my understanding that even when there is no mandatory reporting Jehovahs witnesses are advised to contact authorities if they have any knowledge of child abuse. There is certainly nothing to prevent anyone from doing so and we have no jurisdiction to force anyone to do so.
I prefer mandatory reporting because it takes away the possibility of accusations of covering up child abuse. Not because I think it will be any more effective in combatting abuse and infact I think that perpetrators will be much less likely to come forward but at least it will protect organisation like ours from accusations of covering up child abuse.
27 Dec 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieNo but at least you will educate yourself and not make uncorroborated remarks like accusing others of covering up rape of minors when you have no knowledge of anything that transpired and of what type of sexual abuse was perpetrated and recorded.
Its such I'll informed opinions like yours that prevents frank and open discussion because the projection of your ignorance only knows child abuse from a single perspective and assumes that all sexual child abuse takes the same form.
As to your question regarding mandatory reporting, its my understanding that even when there is no mandatory reporting Jehovahs witnesses are advised to contact authorities if they have any knowledge of child abuse. There is certainly nothing to prevent anyone from doing so.
I prefer mandatory reporting because it takes away the possibility of accusations of covering up child abuse. Not because I think it will be any more effective and infact I think that perpetrators will be much less likely to come forward but at least it will protect organisation like ours from accusations of covering up child abuse.
OK. Oh well. I consider myself to have been filibustered tonight. But I will raise the question - again another day - of "mandatory reporting" versus "no mandatory reporting" [as it pertains to the obligation of adults to protect children] because it is a moral issue which you do not appear to have thought through whereas I think it's important. But in the meantime, goodnight.
Originally posted by FMFIt really is pointless discussing anything with you. I have answered your question on mandatory reporting.
[b]No but at least you will educate yourself and not make uncorroborated remarks like accusing others of covering up rape of minors when you have no knowledge of anything that transpired and of what type of sexual abuse was perpetrated and recorded.
Its such I'll informed opinions like yours that prevents frank and open discussion because the projection of ...[text shortened]... t appear to have thought through whereas I think it's important. But in the meantime, goodnight.
27 Dec 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSo why were there no cases of child abuse reported by the JWs for five decades in Australia?
As to your question regarding mandatory reporting, its my understanding that even when there is no mandatory reporting Jehovahs witnesses are advised to contact authorities if they have any knowledge of child abuse.