Originally posted by AThousandYoungNo offense, but your opinion doesn't carry a whole lot of weight, if you are unable to distinguish a difference between the worship of inanimate objects and the worship of their Creator.
The kumquat post was no less ridiculous than Christianity in my opinion. I still have no idea what your post was supposed to mean.
Originally posted by DeepThoughtUnbelievable!!!
Breach of promise regarding an afterlife presumably, unless there is some more specific grievance against a particular church. As it's a civil case it would go on balance of probability, rather than proof beyond reasonable doubt, which from an agnostic point of view is quite an entertaining proposition. Sadly I doubt he'll get very far as he'll have to ...[text shortened]... liberately telling people to do the wrong things in order to reduce overcrowding in heaven...
How could they ever know heaven is going to be overcrowded 🙄
What are these people thinking anyway?