Spirituality
05 Aug 17
08 Aug 17
Originally posted by @apathistNo.
You are open to critique? So share your reasons for believing the bible tells you the truth about the nature of reality and the afterlife.
You are welcome to criticise my religion , but you have not earned the right to criticise why I follow it.
08 Aug 17
3 edits
Originally posted by @apathistYour petty insults remind me of all the other religionists in here, only less effectual.
I'm not an awesome critical thinker but you are so far behind the curve I guess it seems that way to you.
At least they aspire to worship the creator rather than the created.
08 Aug 17
1 edit
Originally posted by @apathistThe thing is apathist, you are probably a nice guy (or gal) with good intentions, but you lack the rationality of the atheists and the spiritual pedigree of the sincere religionists. You peddle a shallow, muddled, dope-fuelled vacuous ideology which is nothing more that you trying to appear slightly superior by adopting certain labels.
But 'brain science' isn't nearly as humorous a play on phrases.
08 Aug 17
Originally posted by @divegeesterYes through critical thinking , by getting into the spirit of other's post.
I think that if you are going to pitch up here and blanket attack Christians for their lack of critical thinking whilst at the same time claiming oneself to be both atheist and pagan at the same time, then one deserves to have one's chops slapped.
This can be demonstrated by different means.
You adhere to the Christian label you should cop what comes with that
09 Aug 17
Originally posted by @divegeesterYou're reasons are secret, got it. So why should I give your religion respect? What reasons should I have for believing in what you preach.
No.
You are welcome to criticise my religion , but you have not earned the right to criticise why I follow it.
09 Aug 17
Originally posted by @divegeesterWhy should I believe there is a creator?
Your petty insults remind me of all the other religionists in here, only less effectual.
At least they aspire to worship the creator rather than the created.
09 Aug 17
Originally posted by @divegeesterThe thing is divegeester, you are may be a nice guy (or gal) with good intentions, but you lack the rationality of the theists and the spiritual fortitude of the sincere atheists. You peddle a shallow, muddled, indoctine-fueled vacuous ideology which is nothing more that you trying to appear slightly superior by adopting certain labels.
The thing is apathist, you are probably a nice guy (or gal) with good intentions, but you lack the rationality of the atheists and the spiritual pedigree of the sincere religionists. You peddle a shallow, muddled, dope-fuelled vacuous ideology which is nothing more that you trying to appear slightly superior by adopting certain labels.
09 Aug 17
Originally posted by @kellyjayIt seems per physics math and observations that our universe began as a singularity. Physics math is quiet about how the singularity began existence, but conservation laws (and intuition) suggest there would be a mega-verse already existing, so it is turtles all the way down.
Where did it all come from, think about it critically?
Or maybe the fundamental constants (more physics math) change over time in one way or the other for this reason or that, so that actually our universe is eternal.
But kelly, the mere fact that we don't know 'where it all came from' is not resolved by resorting to faith belief in ancient myths.
09 Aug 17
Originally posted by @kellyjayAgain, why should I believe there is a creator. And more: even if there is a creator, why should I believe your preferred god is the correct choice.
Where did it all come from, think about it critically?
09 Aug 17
Originally posted by @karoly-aczelSure, of course.
Yes through critical thinking , by getting into the spirit of other's post.
This can be demonstrated by different means.
You adhere to the Christian label you should cop what comes with that
09 Aug 17
Originally posted by @apathistOh dear.
The thing is divegeester, you are may be a nice guy (or gal) with good intentions, but you lack the rationality of the theists and the spiritual fortitude of the sincere atheists. You peddle a shallow, muddled, indoctine-fueled vacuous ideology which is nothing more that you trying to appear slightly superior by adopting certain labels.
09 Aug 17
1 edit
Originally posted by @apathistBut I'm not seeking your respect apathist.
I don't respect cowards, divegeester. Your pathetic insults reflect only on you.
I regard you as one of the posters here who contributes virtually nothing of value, either spirituality, intellectually, emotionally or humourously.
09 Aug 17
Originally posted by @apathistFor some of the same reasons you believe nature to be a "mother".
Why should I believe there is a creator?