Originally posted by frogstompI messed up my first line, it should read :
Isn't about the same as stress and strain.
the former is the cause of the latter.
without stress a beam doesn't sag.
Aren't they about the same as stress and strain?
as you can readily tell I make a lot of typos
Originally posted by frogstompGOD always exsisted. Where HIS throne is has always been. GOD has no beginning and no end. GOD lives in a place called eternity. In eternity there is no time. GOD created time when he create earth. A time for us to live in until the purpose, of created time is carried out.
Do you realize you are saying God created the the place he started in?
It's time you make clear which concept of time and space you are using. There are different ones.
Originally posted by blindfaith101So she didn't create time when she created the universe. Just when she created the earth? Is that right? Or just when she created Adam and Eve? Which chapter and verse should I be reading about time?
GOD always exsisted. Where HIS throne is has always been. GOD has no beginning and no end. GOD lives in a place called eternity. In eternity there is no time. GOD created time when he create earth. A time for us to live in until the purpose, of created time is carried out.
There is no contest between creation and evolution. One is an expression of religious faith; the other is a well established scientific explanation (theory) of nearly countless observations in nature and in the laboratory.
Evolution does not rule out, nor even address, the hand of a divine Creator behind observable natural phenomena. Creationism rejects the scientific method and inductive reasoning (evidentiary based) in favor of deductive reasoning from faulty principles.
The worst part of the creationist hypothesis stems from its gross distortions of biblical history to serve its literalist hermeneutics. It is no surprise that folks who have such a difficult time comprehending figurative language in their sacred texts find it nearly impossible to observe nature. Their science and their theology are equally flawed. Their perception of conflict between creation and evolution is rooted in misunderstanding of both.
Nevertheless, there are conflicts between creation and evolution in American culture. It is not a conflict within science, but a conflict between science and religion; it is a conflict between knowledge and ignorance. Religion does not inherently embrace ignorance against knowledge, but American fundamentalism has chosen to stand in defense of ignorance.