01 Jun 06
Originally posted by Wulebgrmaybe your looking for something lke this?
The article neither explains the bumper snicker, nor accurately summarizes the biological debates of the nineteenth century, although it is far better than most of the drivel put out by Bush and his ilk.
http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/dahlgren/041025
01 Jun 06
Originally posted by trevor33Pure garbage. The other article was much better informed.
maybe your looking for something lke this?
http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/dahlgren/041025
I was hoping that someone would unpack the text, elucidating its clear meaning (if it has one). Your links only reveal that I'm not the only one that has seen the slogane, that it has been around for a while, and that those who enjoy quoting it to sell journalistic drivel are not driven toward the production of competent exegesis.
As is often the case in the Spirituality forums, one word from Halitose sheds more light than a dozen other posts. If it is irony, as Halitose suggests, what does it mock? What assumed "truth" does it rely upon for the mocking.
Can anyone explain those three pregnant words?
01 Jun 06
Originally posted by Wulebgryour right. this is the closest i've found to say what its meaning is
Pure garbage. The other article was much better informed.
I was hoping that someone would unpack the text, elucidating its clear meaning (if it has one). Your links only reveal that I'm not the only one that has seen the slogane, that it has been around for a while, and that those who enjoy quoting it to sell journalistic drivel are not driven toward the ...[text shortened]... "truth" does it rely upon for the mocking.
Can anyone explain those three pregnant words?
http://iuhps.blogspot.com/2005/03/darwin-loves-you-george-levine-and.html
01 Jun 06
Originally posted by WulebgrSome followers of the Bible seem to think they need to disprove Evolution and Science to prove God exists. It's a funny way of saying you don’t always need to disprove something to prove something else.
Pure garbage. The other article was much better informed.
I was hoping that someone would unpack the text, elucidating its clear meaning (if it has one). Your links only reveal that I'm not the only one that has seen the slogane, that it has been around for a while, and that those who enjoy quoting it to sell journalistic drivel are not driven toward the ...[text shortened]... "truth" does it rely upon for the mocking.
Can anyone explain those three pregnant words?
This is just a guess on my part.
P-
01 Jun 06
Originally posted by trevor33That article offers up some interesting ideas between the lines (among the unstated assumptions), but still employs a title without offering clear exegesis.
your right. this is the closest i've found to say what its meaning is
http://iuhps.blogspot.com/2005/03/darwin-loves-you-george-levine-and.html
I do think you've established the commonality of the assumption that the Darwin referenced on the bumper snicker is a dead Englishman, and not the latest neo-Nazi cult leader in my part of the world.
01 Jun 06
Originally posted by Wulebgrthis is it - the last link needed
That article offers up some interesting ideas between the lines (among the unstated assumptions), but still employs a title without offering clear exegesis.
I do think you've established the commonality of the assumption that the Darwin referenced on the bumper snicker is a dead Englishman, and not the latest neo-Nazi cult leader in my part of the world.
http://www.bumpertalk.com/bumpertalk/BA082A.html